Literature DB >> 7108032

Measurement of pitch in speech: an implementation of Goldstein's theory of pitch perception.

H Duifhuis, L F Willems, R J Sluyter.   

Abstract

Recent developments in hearing theory have resulted in the rather general acceptance of the idea that the perception of pitch of complex sounds is the result of the psychological pattern recognition process. The pitch is supposedly mediated by the fundamental of the harmonic spectrum which fits the spectrum of the complex sound optimally. The problem of finding the pitch is then equivalent to finding the best harmonic match. Goldstein [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1496-1516 (1973)] has described an objective procedure for finding the best fit for stimuli containing relatively few spectral components. He uses maximum likelihood criterion. Application of this procedure to various data on the pitch of complex sounds yielded good results. This motivated our efforts to apply the pattern recognition theory of pitch to the problem of measuring pitch in speech. Although we were able to follow the main line of Goldstein's procedure, some essential changes had to be made. The most important is that in our implementation not all spectral components of the complex sound have to be classified as belonging to the harmonic pattern. We introduced a harmonics sieve to determine whether components are rejected or accepted at a candidate pitch. A simple criterion, based on the components accepted and rejected, led to the decision on which candidate pitch was to be finally selected. The performance and reliability of this psychoacoustically based pitch meter were tested in a LPC-vocoder system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7108032     DOI: 10.1121/1.387811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Inharmonicity detection. Effects of age and contralateral distractor sounds.

Authors:  Manon Grube; D Yves von Cramon; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Pitch perception for mixtures of spectrally overlapping harmonic complex tones.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

6.  Harmonic segregation through mistuning can improve fundamental frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A cocktail party with a cortical twist: how cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Octave effect in auditory attention.

Authors:  Tobias Borra; Huib Versnel; Chantal Kemner; A John van Opstal; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Regularity of spectral pattern and its effects on the perceptual fusion of harmonics.

Authors:  B Roberts; P J Bailey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.