Literature DB >> 28077626

Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models.

Feng Ru Tang1, Weng Keong Loke2, Boo Cheong Khoo3.   

Abstract

Animal experimental studies indicate that acute or chronic low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR) (≤100 mSv) or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation (LDRIR) (<6 mSv/h) exposures may be harmful. It induces genetic and epigenetic changes and is associated with a range of physiological disturbances that includes altered immune system, abnormal brain development with resultant cognitive impairment, cataractogenesis, abnormal embryonic development, circulatory diseases, weight gain, premature menopause in female animals, tumorigenesis and shortened lifespan. Paternal or prenatal LDIR/LDRIR exposure is associated with reduced fertility and number of live fetuses, and transgenerational genomic aberrations. On the other hand, in some experimental studies, LDIR/LDRIR exposure has also been reported to bring about beneficial effects such as reduction in tumorigenesis, prolonged lifespan and enhanced fertility. The differences in reported effects of LDIR/LDRIR exposure are dependent on animal genetic background (susceptibility), age (prenatal or postnatal days), sex, nature of radiation exposure (i.e. acute, fractionated or chronic radiation exposure), type of radiation, combination of radiation with other toxic agents (such as smoking, pesticides or other chemical toxins) or animal experimental designs. In this review paper, we aimed to update radiation researchers and radiologists on the current progress achieved in understanding the LDIR/LDRIR-induced bionegative and biopositive effects reported in the various animal models. The roles played by a variety of molecules that are implicated in LDIR/LDRIR-induced health effects will be elaborated. The review will help in future investigations of LDIR/LDRIR-induced health effects by providing clues for designing improved animal research models in order to clarify the current controversial/contradictory findings from existing studies.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; bionegative and biopositive effect; low-dose or low-dose-rate irradiation; molecular mechanism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28077626      PMCID: PMC5439383          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrw120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


INTRODUCTION

Low-dose ionizing radiation (LDIR), which is ubiquitous in our environment, is defined as a radiation dose of 100 mSv or less (≤100 mGy). Low-dose-rate ionizing radiation (LDRIR) is defined as the rate of radiation exposure at 6 mSv or less per hour (<6 mSv/h) [1-3]. With increased use of X-ray Computed Tomography (CT scan) for medical diagnosis and radiotherapy, diagnostic radiation examination is the largest man-made source of radiation exposure to the general population, contributing ~40% of the total annual worldwide exposure from all sources in advanced countries. Available data suggests that ~0·5% of cancer deaths in the USA over the last 30 years were attributable to diagnostic X-rays [4]. Increased construction of nuclear power plants worldwide (and consequently potential nuclear accidents), occupational radiation exposure, frequent-flyer risks, manned space exploration and possible radiological terrorism have made LDIR/LDRIR research much more imperative and urgent nowadays than ever before. This may explain why many new low-dose radiation research institutes have been established recently in varioust countries worldwide. While high-dose-radiation–induced human diseases are well known [5-8], the effects of LDIR or LDRIR on animal and human health is still under extensive scientific research. Available data indicates that LDIR or LDRIR may induce cancer [9-12], cataract [13], cardiovascular diseases [14] and long-term psychological effects [15]. However, there exist many uncertainties in estimation of the health risks associated with exposure to LDIR or LDRIR based on existing published studies. These uncertainties significantly affect almost every facet of our lives, especially medical care, energy production, homeland security, defence, occupational health and safety, manufacturing, and industry, leading to unnecessary increased spending; they have also prevented society from exploiting nuclear energy for clean energy production. Recent conflicting research findings on LDIR- or LDRIR-induced health effects justify the need for a comprehensive review of these results. In this review, by carefully reviewing published experimental data obtained from various animal species/strains, radiation sources/components, doses, animal ages, end-points, end-point biomarker changes and types of organs, and tissues or cells exposed to radiation, we aimed to update radiation researchers and radiologists on current progress made in the understanding of LDIR/LDRIR-induced bionegative (harmful effect on organism, with a focus on human diseases) and biopositive (beneficial effect on organism) effects in animal research models. The review will help in future investigations of LDIR/LDRIR-induced health effects by providing clues for designing improved animal research models in order to clarify the current controversial/contradictory findings from existing studies.

LDIR and LDRIR-INDUCED BIONEGATIVE EFFECTS IN ANIMAL MODELS

EffectS of acute low-dose radiation exposure

Genetic and epigenetic changes after low-dose radiation exposures

Acute LDIR or LDRIR induces different genetic and epigenetic changes. In mice with pink-eyed unstable (p) mutation, prenatal exposure to very low doses of ionizing radiation (as low as 10 mGy) could induce reversion events in the mouse embryo, which was detected as black spots on the fur of the animals or microscopically as partially black hair in a background of colorless hair. A linear dose–response was observed between 10 mGy and 1000 mGy of X-ray irradiation [16]. In a separate study [17], γ-radiation at 10 mGy was reported to induce upregulation of transformation-related protein 53 (Trp53) in both radiosensitive (liver) and radioresistant (spleen) tissues. This protein plays a central role in both DNA damage and stress response by selecting downstream effectors for proliferation or apoptosis. There was no apparent lower threshold for induction of these effects [17]. At 100 mGy of γ-radiation, increased expression of PARP-2, Gas2 and PCNA genes was reported in 8- to 10-week-old male B6C3F1/HSD mice. These genes are involved in the cellular DNA damage response where PARP-2 detects DNA damage, Gas2 acts as a growth-arrest-specific gene and PCNA is involved in DNA synthesis activities. Gamma-irradiation was also reported to upregulate the expression of the programmed cell death gene Pdcd6 and to downregulate many of the glutamate receptor genes involved in synaptic signaling such as Grik5, Grin1 and Gria3, motor protein and cytoskeletal element genes, as well as genes associated with vesicle trafficking. Changes in transcript levels of several genes involved in brain development were also observed, including downmodulation of developmental genes Dbn and Rln, neurotrophic factors like Fgf 9, Psap and Gfra2, and neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) [18]. While long-term monitoring was not performed post γ-rays irradiation in this study, initial upregulation of programmed cell death genes and downregulation of developmental, neurotrophic factors, neural cell adhesion molecules, synaptic signaling genes after low-dose irradiation at 100 mGy suggests that brain development, plasticity and functions may be affected at the later developmental stages of the animal life. Ultra-low radiation doses of 0.005–0.01 mGy were reported to induce chromosomal inversions in pKZ1 mouse prostatic tissue, whereas radiation doses of 1 and 10 mGy reduced inversions to below the sham-treated frequency. These studies suggested that the pKZ trans-gene is a sensitive passive gene expression reporter for low-dose radiation responses [19-21]. Low-dose proton radiation increased mutant frequencies in brain tissue but not in spleen tissue at 8 weeks after exposure. This indicates that brain tissue has higher sensitivity to low-dose proton radiation–induced negative effects [22]. Subjecting the bone marrow to internal 18F-FDG radiation exposures at 33.43 mGy and higher doses, or to 25 mGy and above for external X-ray exposure, induced a significant elevation (dose response) in the micro-nucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) frequency [23, 24]. Using a surface-based mass spectrometry approach, Lee et al. (2012) found statistically significant, low-dose-specific, changes to metabolic profiles 6 h post irradiation at 100 mGy [25]. Low-dose–low-LET X-ray irradiation induced delayed genomic instability in both CBA/H and C57BL/6J hemopoeitic stem cells [26]. Available data suggests that LDIR- or LDRIR-induced genetic and epigenetic changes may be affected not only by animal species, strains, genetic backgrounds (normal and genetically susceptible animals), developmental stages, and radiosensitive organs, but also by the nature of the irradiation source (i.e. proton, X-rays, γ-rays etc; Table 1). Further investigations are needed to demonstrate the long-term health effects arising from ionizing irradiation–induced genetic and epigenetic changes. The mechanisms behind these genetic and epigenetic changes remain unknown and may need further studies.
Table 1.

Low-dose radiation–induced genetic and epigenetic changes in animal models

Animal strainsRadiation sourceAge and doseEnd-point from irradiationEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
Female mouse with pink-eyed unstable (pun) mutationX-raysPrenatal exposure at 17.5 days from 10 mGy to 1 Gy6-day-old offspringIncreased black spots (melansome streaks) on the fur at 10 mGy[16]
Female miceγ-rays10-wk-old with doses from 10 mGy to 1 Gy (dose rate: 0.64 Gy/m)1 h after irradiationIncreased induction of Trp53 at 10 mGy in spleen cells, suggesting no lower threshold for induction of Trp53[18]
Male B6C3F1/HSD miceγ-rays8- to 10-wk-old with 100 mGy (dose rate: 0.18 Gy/m30 min and 4 h after whole-body irradiationIncreased expression for Parp-2, Gas2, Pcna, Pdcd6, Grik5, Grin1 and Gria3; decreased expression for Bub3 in brain at 100 mGy[19]
C57/Bl mice (male and female)X-raysFractionated exposure at500 mGy applied as 50 mGy per day (2 mGy/s) for 10 days, or acute exposure 500 mGy (dose rate: 0.12 Gy/m)2 h after irradiationGlobal genome DNA methylation in the liver and muscle. There are sex- and tissue-specific differences in p16(INKa) promoter methylation upon LDR exposure. In male liver tissue, p16(INKa) promoter methylation was more pronounced than in female tissue.[65]
Decrease in histone H4-Lys20 trimethylation in the thymus, which was accompanied by a significant decrease in global DNA methylation as well as the accumulation of DNA damage.[68]
pKZ1 mouseX-rays1 μGy–2 Gyanimal age: not mentioned3 days after irradiation>100 mGy or <0.01 mGy: induction of chromosomal inversions in spleen cells; 0.1–100 mGy: decrease of chromosomal inversions[1921]
C57BL/6J plasmid-based lacZ transgenic mouseProton radiation6–12-wk-old with100 mGy–4 Gy1 day to 16 weeks after irradiationIncreased mutant frequencies in brain tissue from 2 days to 8 weeks at 100 mGy[22]
Female B6.129S2-Trp53tm1Tyj/1x129×1/SvJ mousePositron emission tomography (PET) scans7–9-wk-oldwith 18F-FDG at 0–150 or γ-rays at 0–100 mGy24 and 43 h after irradiationIrradiation doses to the bone marrow corresponding to 33.43 mGy and above for internal 18F-FDG exposure and to 25 mGy and above for external X-ray exposure induced significant increases in micronucleated reticulocyte formation in blood cells[23, 24]
BALB/c and Spret/EiJ), and F1-backcross (F1Bx)X-rays100 mGy6 h after irradiationSignificant low-dose-specific metabolic profiles[25]
Male CBA/H and C57BL/6 mouseX-rays10–12-wk-old mice at 10 mGy–3.0 Gy24 h after irradiationChromosomal instability, higher levels of TGF-β1 and TNF-α[26]
Low-dose radiation–induced genetic and epigenetic changes in animal models

LDIR/LDRIR-induced carcinogenesis

The cancer risk associated with exposure to LDIR/LDRIR has traditionally been extrapolated from effects observed at high-dose/high-dose-rate radiation using a linear no-threshold model. Recent animal experimental data supports the association of cancer risk with LDIR (Table 2). Using a bitransgenic mouse model to measure the carcinogenic risk of exposure to multiple whole-body CT doses, a significant increase in the number of lung tumors per mouse was observed [27]. Irradiated females had significantly more excess tumors than irradiated males. Irradiated bitransgenic mice that did not express the Ki-RAS (G12C) oncogene had a low tumor incidence that was not affected by exposure to CT radiation. This study suggests that among individuals expressing cancer susceptibility genes, low-dose CT radiation may induce carcinogenesis. Genetic mechanisms may also influence susceptibility to LDIR-induced mammary cancer. After LDIR, the mammary glands of radiation-sensitive BALB/c but not resistant C57BL/6 inbred mice showed early transcriptional responses, including diminished immune response, increased cellular stress, altered transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ)-signaling and inappropriate expression of developmental genes [28]. The low-dose fractionation irradiation protocol could significantly modify mammary gland cancer outcome. Tumor incidence rates appeared correlated to the delivered dose per fraction, which was in agreement with the previous study [29]. TGFβ activation was a non-targeted radiation outcome that mediated microenvironment composition and occurred in mouse mammary gland following LDIR. It persisted in the stroma for at least a week, where it mediated stromal extracellular matrix remodeling and cell fate decisions following DNA damage [30]. Evidence indicated that both TGFβ and p53 pathways might be involved in mammary tumor susceptibility to non-targeted radiation [31]. Single or repeated low-dose irradiation could result in accumulation of persisting DNA damage foci in cortical neurons, adversely affecting brain tissue and increasing the risk of carcinogenesis [32, 33]. Although such findings from animal experiments are not directly applicable to humans, these data can substantially add to our knowledge on the relationship between a wide range of ionizing radiation dose and cancer risk [34].
Table 2.

Low-dose radiation–induced carcinogenesis in animal models

Animal strainsRadiation sourceAge and doseEnd-point from irradiationEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
Bitransgenic CCSP-rtTA/Ki-ras mouseMultiple whole-body CT doses9-wk-old mice, fractionated whole-body exposures of 5, 15 or 25 mGy for 4 times + lung imaging exposures of 30 mGy at 3 and 6 months (with total lung doses of 80, 120 and 160 mGy).9 months afterirradiationFractionated low-dose CT-radiation–induced carcinogenesis in individuals expressing cancer susceptibility gene. Irradiated females had significantly more excess tumors than irradiated males.[27]
BALB/c and C57BL/6X-rays9-wk-old mice, fractionated whole-body exposures of 75 mGy (weekly for 4 weeks; dose rate: 0.196 Gy/m)4 h and 1 month after last exposureLow-dose radiation modified mammary gland cancer outcome, and mammary gland responses were strongly influenced by genotype,[28]
Female BALB/c/An NBd miceγ-rays12-wk-old mice with a total dose of 2 Gy, fractionated exposure of 100 mGy/daily for 20 days (dose rate: 0.35 Gy/m)Life-span monitoring carcinogenesis till natural deathFor lung adenocarcinomas and mammary adenocarcinomas, carcinogenesis is dependent upon the per fractionated low-dose radiation exposure[29]
BALB/c miceγ-rays>12-wk-old,0.1–5 Gy (dose rate: 0.35 Gy/m)3 days afterirradiationTGF-beta may serve as a mediator of tissue response to low-dose ionizing radiation, and orchestrate tissue response to oxidative stress[30]
Female C57BL/6 and BALB/c miceγ-rays6-wk-old,4 weekly exposures to 75 mGy4 or 10 h and 1 month after exposureLow-dose radiation response, at least for a number of genes, is highly dependent on exposure context and genetic background.[32]
Genotyped repair-deficient ATM−/−, questionable repair-proficient ATM+/− and repair-proficient ATM+/+ mice, SCID (CB17/Icr-Prkdcscid/Rj) miceγ-radiation6-wk-old,0.1 Gy or 0.1 Gy × 10, 0.1 Gy × 20, 0.1 Gy × 400.5 h or 72 h after irradiation at 0.1 Gy or 24 or 72 h after the last fractionated irradiationsSingle or repeated irradiation with 0.1 Gy leads to the accumulation of persisting DNA damage foci in cortical neurons, and thus may adversely affect brain tissue and increase the risk of carcinogenesis[33]
Female A/J mice treated with 4-(methylnitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK)whole-body CT7-wk-old, irradiated 4 weekly doses of 0, 10, 30 or 50 mGy for total radiationdoses of 40 mGy8 months after last CT scanExposure of sensitive populations to CT radiation increased the risk of tumorigenesis. Antioxidants could prevent the long-term carcinogenic effects of low-dose radiation exposure[35]
Low-dose radiation–induced carcinogenesis in animal models To mimic the effects of CT screening in heavy smokers and ex-smokers, Miller et al. (2013) assessed the effects of low-dose CT radiation in mice exposed to 4-(methyl-nitrosoamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and observed that irradiated mice exhibited significant increases in tumor multiplicity and size of tumour area compared with non-irradiated mice with no dose effect observed. In addition, female mice exhibited higher sensitivity to radiation exposure than their male counterparts. These data suggested that exposure of sensitive populations to CT radiation increases the risk of tumorigenesis [35]. The occurrence of LDIR/LIRIR-induced carcinogenesis in animal models appears to be dependent not only on animal genetic background (sensitive population), organ sensitivity, sex, but also on protocol for delivery of fractionation low-dose radiation, type of radiation employed (i.e. photon, proton or positron). More importantly, synergic interaction of LDIR/LIRIR with other toxic agents such as different chemicals from tobacco smoke was observed to significantly enhance the carcinogenesis rate, a finding that is likely to be relevant to carcinogenesis risk in human populations.

LDIR/LDRIR exposure and changes of brain neural plasticity

Radiation-induced alterations in the microenvironment can cause significant effects on brain neurogenesis in the mammalian brain. At different maturation stages, newly generated neurons in the dentate gyrus have distinct contributions to learning and memory, and events that decrease neurogenesis impair animal performance in learning and memory [36, 37] (Table 3). Subjecting pregnant mice to 100 mGy X-ray irradiation at Day 13 (E13) post coitus increased incidences of single-strand breaks (SSBs), but decreased mitochondrial biogenesis in hippocampal neuronal samples examined at postnatal Day 25 (P25) and at P180 [38]. It remains to be established whether prenatal irradiation-induced postnatal hippocampal pathophysiological changes will lead to schizophrenia or other neurological disorders [39]. Whole-body low-dose proton irradiation induced an acute decrease in cell division within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus at doses as low as 100 mGy. The proliferation inhibitory effects from 100 mGy persist in the subgranular zone together with a decrease in hippocampal ICAM-1 immunoreactivity at 1 month post irradiation. At 3 months post irradiation, decrease in neurogenesis was still observable following 500 mGy irradiation [40]. Similar brain damage and impaired cognition were observed following exposure to 100 mGy of γ irradiation [41, 42].
Table 3.

Low-dose radiation–induced developmental changes in the animal brain

Animal strainsRadiation sourceAge and doseEnd-point from irradiationEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
Han:NMRI miceX-raysGestational Day 13 with 100 mGy (dose rate: 0.59 Gy/m)One day after, or postnatal Day 25 (P25) or P180Increased single-strand breaks (SSBs) content and mitochondrial (mt) biogenesis[38]
Male C57BL/6J miceProton8–10–wk-old with 10 mGy48 h–12 monthsAn acute decrease in cell division within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and a decrease in hippocampal ICAM-1 immunoreactivity at 1 month postirradiation[40]
B6C3F1 male miceγ-rays8–10-wk-old with 100 mGy (dose rate: 0.64 Gy/m)4 hInduced expression of Troponin T1 (Tnnt 1) in pyramidal neurons of cerebral cortex and hippocampus, and in Purkinje cells of cerebellum[41]
B6C3F1 male miceγ-rays8–10-wk-old with 100 mGy(dose rate: 0.64 Gy/m)4 hActivated nine neural signaling pathways in the mice showed a high degree of concordance in their transcriptional response with the aging human brain or the brain tissue from patients with Alzheimer's disease[42]
APP/PSEN1 miceSilicon radiationYoung mice with 0.1 Gy3 monthsSpatial learning ability was impaired[43]
C57BL/6J1H10-wk-old with 100 mGy 1H1 and 3 monthsNovel object recognition was impaired, and newly born activated microglia were significantly elevated[45]
Thy1-EGFP transgene miceProton8-wk-old with 100 mGy (dose rate: 0.25 Gy/m)1 monthSignificant reduction of immature dendritic spines of granule cells[46]
Low-dose radiation–induced developmental changes in the animal brain The high degree of concordance between the affected pathways observed in the brain tissue of mice exposed to LDIR and those in the brain tissue of aging humans and Alzheimer's patients suggested that low-dose irradiation modulates the expression of gene pathways involved in cognitive function. This was supported by a recent study indicating that transgenic mice engineered to develop Alzheimer's disease–like neuropathology exhibit exacerbated short-term cognitive impairment when they are subjected to 100 mGy of silicon (250 MeV/n) radiation [43]. Observations of significantly smaller brains within birds living in areas contaminated by radioactive material from Chernobyl supports the hypothesis that LDIR/LDRIR has significant negative effects on normal brain development, resulting in impairment of cognitive ability [44]. Recent studies indicated that LDIR induced neuro-inflammation and significant reductions in the number and density of dendritic spines along hippocampal neurons of the dentate gyrus. These changes may contribute to impairment of cognition [45, 46]. Overall, existing experimental data suggest that different sources of low-dose radiation induce brain inflammation and dendro-architectonic changes, leading to the impairment of neurogenesis, neural plasticity changes and subsequent cognitive impairment. Further study will be required to establish the relationships between LDIR/LDRIR exposure, animal genetic background, age, changes in neural plasticity, and neurological and neuropsychological disorders.

LDIR exposure and cataractogenesis

The lens is a highly-ordered tissue with unique optical properties and is one of the most radiosensitive tissues in the body. Ocular ionizing radiation exposure results in characteristic, dose-related, progressive lens changes leading to cataract formation [47-49]. In vitro study on the isolated intact young rat lens indicated that radiation doses as low as 100 mGy induced cataract formation [50]. At very low doses of 2 mGy to 100 mGy, exposure to 600 MeV/amu 56Fe or medium-energy (440 keV) neutrons, 250 MeV protons, 670 MeV/amu 20Ne, 600 MeV/amu 93Nb, 593MeV/amu 139La ions and 50 Co γ-rays will induce micronucleus, meridional row disorganization and various stages of lens opacification in rodents [51-54]. (Table 4).
Table 4.

Low-dose radiation–induced cataractogenesis

Animal species and strainsRadiation sourceAge and doseEnd-point from irradiationEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
Wistar ratγ-raysYoung rat with 0.1 Gy (dose rate: 1.25 Gy/m)24 hCataractogenic degeneration[50]
B6CF1 mouse56Fe3–4-month-old with 50 and 100 mGy16 monthsCytopathological changes, including micronucleation, interphase death, and meridional row disorganization, and a pronounced ‘focal’ loss of epithelial cytoarchitecture[51]
Columbia-Sherman albino ratsNeutron4-wk-old with 2, 10, 50 mGy102 wkCataractogenesis[52]
Columbia-Sherman albino rats40Ar Ions4-wk-old with 10, 50 mGyEvery 2–3 wk, within a period of 3 days, up to a post-irradiation time of 67 wkCataractogenesis[53]
B6CF1/An1 MouseProton, 20Ne, 56Fe, 93Nb, 193La ions, 60Co,90–110 days with 100 mGy for Proton, 20Ne, 56Fe, 93Nb, 193La ions, 60Co,64 wkMicronucleus frequency and meridional row disorganization[54]
Low-dose radiation–induced cataractogenesis

Prenatal LDIR induced malformations of embryos and fetuses

Prenatal LDIR exposure induces teratogenesis and mortality [55-61] (Table 5). In female CF1 and BALB/c strain mice, irradiation with X-rays (100 mGy) at 7 h post fertilization resulted in increased frequency of malformed fetuses and Dwarfism occurrence when examined 18 days later. Radiation induced a dose-dependent increase of pre-implantation loss in the BALB/c strain of mice and early post-implantation loss in the CF1 strain of mice. However, embryos of the BALB/c strain were refractory to the induction of teratogenic effects after such pre-implantation irradiation [59]. In the CF1 female Swiss mice, subjecting the half-day-old embryo (prior to the first cleavage) to a low-dose irradiation of 50 mGy increased embryonic death [62]. When entire oviducts and uteri were examined at 6 and 24 h after irradiation for signs of very early embryos, observations of delayed first cleavage and increase in the number of abnormal embryos were made, suggesting that the newly fertilized egg was probably the most radiosensitive cell in the mouse [63]. Subjecting pregnant mice from two different strains (F/A and NMRI) to 10 mGy of whole-body pion- or X-ray irradiation at Day 8 of gestation resulted in a significant increase in the rate of abnormal fetuses compared with non-irradiated, but restrained fetuses [55]. When pregnant Swiss albino mice were exposed to low doses of X-rays (~9 mGy) on gestational Day 3.5 (pre-implantation period), Day 6.5 (early organogenesis period) or Day 11.5 (late organogenesis period), and the fetuses were examined on the 18th day of gestation, a significant increase in prenatal mortality was observed for those exposed at 3.5 days post coitus (d.p.c.). An increased incidence of retarded fetuses was also observed with exposure at 3.5 and 6.5 d.p.c. The major effect of exposure at 11.5 d.p.c. was a significant decrease in the fetal head size and brain weight [57]. When pregnant mice were exposed to 100 mGy of γ-radiation at 11.5 d.p.c., detectable levels of microcephaly and microphthalmia were evident [58]. These studies suggested that the late period of organogenesis in the mouse, especially between 10 and 12 d.p.c., was a particularly radiation-sensitive phase in the development of the skull, brain and eye. Experimental data in rodents suggested that prenatal radiation exposure to a very low dose (9 mGy) may induce prenatal mortality or malformations of embryos or fetuses. The exact degree of radiation-induced impairment is dependent on the animal developmental stages, radiation doses and animal strains. Further studies will still be needed to confirm the reproducibility of these animal experimental data and to find out whether similar doses could induce any abnormality in human embryos or fetuses.
Table 5.

Prenatal low-dose radiation–induced malformations of embryos and fetuses in animal models

Animal strainsRadiation sourceAge and doseEnd-point from irradiationEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
CF1 female Swiss miceX-raysGestational Day 0.5 with 43.85 mGy (dose rate: 0.15 Gy/m)Gestational Day 18.5The exposure caused 11% more deaths than the controls[62]
CF1 female Swiss miceX-raysAfter fertilization but before any cleavage movements with 50 mGy (dose rate: 0.0455 Gy/m).At 6 and 24 h after irradiationThe first cleavage was delayed, and there was an increase from 2.5% in the controls to 20% in the number of abnormals, among the irradiated.[63]
F/A and NMRI micePion- or X-irradiationGestational Day 8, 10 mGy5 days after exposureA significant increase in the rate of abnormal fetuses[55]
Swiss albino miceX-raysGestational Day 3.5, 6.5 and 11.5 at ~9 mGy (dose rate: 0.83 Gy/m).Gestational Day 18Significant increase in prenatal mortality, increased incidence of retarded fetuses and a significant decrease in the fetal head size and brain weight[57]
γ-raysGestational Day 11.5, exposed to 50 mGy to 500 mGy (dose rate: 0.83 Gy/m).Gestational Day 18Significant reduction in head size and brain weight, a linear dose response for these effects in the dose range of 50 mGy to 150 mGy.[58]
BALB/c and CF1 miceX-rays7 h after fertilization exposed to100, 500 and 1000 mGy (dose rate: 0.8 Gy/m)Gestational Day 18frequency of malformed fetuses increased; dwarfism occurred in CF1 mice[59]
ICR miceX-raysGestational Day 9.5 with 20 mGy (dose rate: 0.667 mGy/m) 4 h after the priming irradiationGestational Day 18.5Primary conditioning with low doses of radiation suppresses radiation-induced teratogenesis[60]
C57BL/6J miceX-raysGestational Day 11 with priming low dose from X-rays at 50 or 300 mGy (dose rate: 0.33 Gy/m) on gestation Day 11 followed by high dose of 3.5 Gy 1 day afterGestational Day 18The priming low dose of X-rays significantly reduced the occurrence of prenatal fetal death, malformation, and/or low body weight induced by the challenge high dose of radiation[61]
Prenatal low-dose radiation–induced malformations of embryos and fetuses in animal models

Effects of chronic LDIR/LDRIR exposure

Animal models subjected to chronic LDIR/LDRIR exposure have been utilized to understand the effects of human exposure to various radiation sources, including nuclear fallout, diagnostics ionizing radiation exposure, and high background radiation exposure. Continuous LDRIR exposure of Holtzman rats for 11 generations induced a cumulative hereditary effect leading to reduced animal numbers per litter. LDRIR exposure from the 15th day of gestation through to the 23rd day of post-natal life resulted in dose-rate-dependent damage to the testes [64]. Chronic LDRIR exposure induced global genome DNA methylation in the mouse liver and muscle. These changes were sex- and tissue-specific in p16 (INKa) promoter methylation. In male liver tissue, p16 (INKa) promoter methylation was more pronounced than in female tissue [65]. In rat fetuses subjected to fractionated γ-irradiation at doses of 50 mGy during the 6th to 18th prenatal days, there was a deceleration of neuroblast migration into the primary cortex [66]. All cellular zones of the developing cortex showed increases in the absolute number of macroglial cells [67]. Decrease in histone H4-Lys20 trimethylation occurred in the thymus, which was accompanied by a significant decrease in global DNA methylation as well as the accumulation of DNA damage [68]. In natural populations of the bank vole that were chronically exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation over 22 animal generations within the 10 years following the Chernobyl accident, transgenerational accumulation of radiation damage occurred via genetic and/or epigenetic pathways [69]. Long-term monitoring of Chernobyl's radioactive impact on fauna showed increased occurrence of tumor and immunodeficiencies, decreased life expectancy, early aging, and changes in blood and the circulatory system. There were also higher mutation rates and transgenerational genomic instability in animal populations found within contaminated territories [70]. Chronic LDRIR decreased the tumor-specific immune response, enhanced tumorigenesis, and resulted in a variety of neoplasms and shortening of the mouse life span [71-74]. LDRIR of male germ cells cause genetic changes that could be transmitted to the offspring, leading to significant decreases in the mean litter size. The mean number of weaned pups per female bred to males exposed to LDRIR was also reduced compared with the non-irradiated controls [75]. Similarly, transgenerational LDIR exposure was observed to induce dose-rate-dependent, non-linear increase of unrepaired 8-hydroxyguanine (oxidized guanine) in muscle tissue of Japanese medaka fish with radiation-induced activation of DNA repair systems observed above a threshold radiation level [76] (Table 6). Current animal experimental data thus suggest that chronic LDIR/LDRIR exposures may induce genetic, epigenetic and transgenerational changes, reduce immune responses and promote carcinogenesis, in particular, leukemia. The radiation exposures may also affect brain development, decrease lifespan, and induce early aging, weight gain, premature menopause and diseases in circulatory system. These changes are low dose/low dose rate– and animal strain–dependent. While similar changes were not reported among Japanese A-Bomb survivors, this could be attributed to differences in the nature of the radiation involved, the radiation dose and dose rates applied, or simply to differences in response from human and rodents [28, 75].
Table 6.

Health effects of chronic low-dose/low-dose-rate radiation exposure in animal models

Animal strainsRadiation sourceExposure periodEnd-point from irradiationEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
Holtzman ratγ-rays20 mGy/23 h-day for 30 days, pre- and early post-natal exposure11 successive generations20 mGy given continuously for 11 generations had a cumulative hereditary effect resulting in a reduced number of individuals per litter[64]
Mongrel rat fetusesγ-raysA total of 50 mGy, given at 6.25 mGy (dose rate: 0.43 mGy/h) daily for 8 days during the prenatal days from 6th to 18th,Day 18 of pregnancyDeceleration of neuroblast migration into the primary cortex, increases in the absolute number of macroglial cells in all cellular zones of the developing cortex[66]
Adverse effects on the processes of stem cellproliferation in the tissues of the developing cortex; also increased the intensity of cell destruction proportionally to the radiation dose[67]
Male and female C57/Bl miceX-rays500 mGy applied as 50 mGy per day for 10 days (dose rate: 0.12 Gy/m)2 h after thelast treatment on Day 10Global genome DNA methylation in the mouse liver and muscle. In male liver tissue, p16(INKa) promoter methylation was more pronounced than in female tissue[65]
Male and female C57/BL6 mice (45-day-old)X-raysFractionated whole-body application of 500 mGy, 50 mGy daily for 10 days (dose rate: 0.12 Gy/m)4 h after the last treatment on Day 10A significant decrease in global DNA methylation as well as the accumulation of DNA damage in the thymus[68]
Male Pzh:SFIS miceX-rays8-wk-old, 50 or 100 mGy/per day for 40 days (dose rate: 0.20 Gy/m), irradiated male mice mated with female mice without irradiationPregnant Day 17Decreases in the number of live fetuses and induced dominant lethal mutations[75]
Bank vole137Cs, 134Cs, 106Ru,144Ce from Chernobyl accidentOver 22 animal generations in 10 year with <73 mGy2 wks; 1, 2, 3 and 4 months; and 1 and 1.5 yearsThe radiation exposure of the parental generations led to an accumulated pool of germline mutations and/or of epigenetic changes, which resulted in elevated levels of chromosome aberrations and in increased embryonic losses in later generations.[69]
Male and female B6C3F1γ-raysFrom 8-wk-old for 400 days with a dose rate of 1 or 20 mGy/per dayLife spanInduced neoplasms and shortening of the life span[71, 72]
Female B6C3F1 miceγ-rays20 mGy/22 h/day for 400 days400 days after irradiationDecreased tumor-specific immune response and enhanced tumorigenesis[73]
Health effects of chronic low-dose/low-dose-rate radiation exposure in animal models

LDIR/LDRIR–INDUCED BIOPOSITIVE EFFECTS IN ANIMALS

Both chronic and acute LDIR or LDRIR exposures have also been reported to elicit long-term biopositive effects (Table 7). Intergenerational supplementation with LDIR has been shown to be beneficial in enhancing reproductive outcome, as mice exposed to a constant low dose of 4.3 mGy/day of γ-irradiation for three generations had increased litter size compared with the control groups [77]. A lightly irradiated Holtzman strain of rats were observed to be more fertile (increased ovulation in dams; increased litter number, viability and growth rates; and faster physical development) than the controls over several generations, with no evidence of mutations in the young that were exposed in utero. Irradiated colonies were maintained in good health throughout 21 generations [78]. Development of rat pups was accelerated after γ-irradiation on Day 21 of the post-natal development (28.8 mGy, dose rate of 1.2 mGy/h) [79]. In male Swiss mice, whole-body irradiation with 50 to 150 mGy of X-rays resulted in remarkable suppression of mounting behavior and psychological stress [80].
Table 7.

Low-dose and low-dose-rate ionizing radiation induced a biopositive effect in the animals

Human population groupRadiation sourceDose exposedEnd-point biomarkersEnd-point biomarker changes and types of cells monitoredReferences
Mice (male and female)γ-rays4.3 mGy/22 h-day for 100 days3 successive generationsIncreased litter size[77]
Ratγ-rays28.8 mGy, at dose rate of 1.2 mGy/h on Day 21 of the postnatal developmentBody massDevelopment of rat pups was accelerated (body mass made up 121% of control)[79]
ICR Swiss mice (male)X-rays50 to 150 mGy(dose rate: 0.2 Gy/m)Behaviour and psychological stressWhole-body irradiation suppressed mounting behavioural and psychological stress[80]
MRL-lpr/lpr mice carrying a deletion in the apoptosis-regulating Fas geneγ-rays0.35 or 1.2 mGy/h for 5 wksLife span and immunological modificationsChronic low-dose-rate γ irradiation prolonged the life span and induced immunological modifications, including a significant increase in CD4+ CD8+ T cells in the thymus and CD8+ T cells in the spleen and also by a significant decrease in CD3+ CD45R/B220+ cells and CD45R/B220+ CD40+ cells in the spleen[81, 82, 84]
C57BL/6, BALB/c, C3H/He, DBA/1, DBA/2 and CBA miceγ-raysγ radiation at 1.2 mGy/h for 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 13 or 17 weeksImmunological modificationsIncrease in CD4+ T cells and CD8 molecule expression, decrease in CD40+ B cells. Increases of CD4+ T cells, CD40+ B cells and anti-SRBC antibody-producing cells by immunization were significantly enhanced by continuous low-dose-rate irradiation at 1.2 mGy/h. CD3- CD4+ T cells, representative of abnormal immune cells,[84]
C57BL/6 miceγ-raysX-raysγ radiation at 1.2 mGy/h for 450 days 35 days before high dose X irradiationThymic lymphomaLow-dose-rate irradiation suppressed thymic lymphoma induction accompanied by immune activation[83]
C57BL/6 miceγ-raysX-raysγ radiation at 1.2 mGy/h for 5 wks before high-dose X irradiation at 1.8 Gy × 4Thymic lymphomaA prolonged γ irradiation at 1 mGy/hr suppressed skin tumors induced by methylcholanthrene and delayed high-dose-radiation–induced thymic lymphomas in C57BL/6 mice.[85]
db/db miceγ-rays0.94 mGy/h for 24 daysType II diabetesContinuous low-dose-rate γ irradiation ameliorated type II diabetes in db/db mice by maintaining insulin secretion[86]
db/db mice (female)γ-rays0.94 mGy/h from 10 weeks of age throughout their livesLife span, nephropathy and antioxidant activitiesContinuous low-dose-rate radiation significantly increased life span in db/db mice, and increased the number of normal capillaries in glomeruli. Antioxidant activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione were significantly increased in kidneys. It also ameliorated diabetic nephropathy and increased life span in db/db mice through the activation of renal antioxidants.[87]
Trp53+/− female miceCT scan or PET scan at 10–12 mGy7–8- wk-old10–12 mGyLifespan study of cancer developmentSingle CT scan significantly extends overall lifespan relative to controls[92]
ApoE−/− (B6.129P2-Apoe tm1lUnc/J) female miceγ-rays25, 50, 100 mGy (dose rate: 1 mGy/m) at 2 or 8 months of age. Mice were euthanized and tissues collected either 3 or 6 months (exposed at 2 months) or 2 or 4 months after exposureProgression of atherosclerosisLow doses given at low dose rate at either early or late stage of diseases were protective, slowing the progression of the diseases[94]
Agouti viable yellow (Avy) miceX-raysGestational Day 4.5, 4–76 mGyUpon weaningIncreased DNA methylation in male offspring, and epigenetic alterations resulting from LDIR play a role in radiation hormesis[136]
Klotho mouseγ-rays0.35 or 0.7 mGy/h γ radiation from 40 days after birthLife spanLow-dose-rate ionizing radiation prolonged the lifespan of mice[88]
Kunming miceX-ray75 mGy (dose rate: 12.5 mGy/m) whole-body X-ray radiation 6 h before S180 sarcoma cell implantationAntitumor effect and hormesis in an erythrocyte systemIncreased the anti-tumor ability of the organism and improved the erythrocyte immune function and the O2-carrying ability.[96]
Low-dose and low-dose-rate ionizing radiation induced a biopositive effect in the animals Chronic low-dose-rate γ irradiation of MRL-lpr/lpr mice carrying a deletion in the apoptosis-regulating Fas gene prolonged the life span and induced various immunological modifications, which included significant increase in CD4+ CD8+ T cells in the thymus and CD8+ T cells in the spleen. Conversely, a significant decrease in CD3+ CD45R/B220+ cells and CD45R/B220+ CD40+ cells occurred in the spleen of these mice [81, 82]. Long-term low-dose-rate irradiation of MRL-lpr/lpr mice suppressed induction of thymic lymphoma by whole-body X-irradiation with four doses of 1.8 Gy. This study suggested the presence of an adaptive response in tumor suppression involving LDIR-induced immune activation [83]. In wild-type mouse strains, chronic LDRIR alone induced a maximum of 30% increase in CD4+ T cells and CD8 molecule expression, while CD40+ B cells decreased significantly. Increases in CD4+ T cells, CD40+ B cells and anti-sheep red blood cells (SRBCs) antibody-producing cells by immunization were significantly enhanced by continuous LDRIR at 1.2 mGy/h. In these chronically low-dose-rate–irradiated mice, CD3CD4+ T cells, representative of abnormal immune cells, were absent, while a dose-dependent increase in these cells was observed in mice subjected to acute high-dose-rate irradiation suggesting that low dose rate irradiation induces biopositive effect [84]. In C57BL/6 mice, continuous irradiation at the low dose rate of 1.2 mGy/h was observed to suppress methylcholanthrene-induced skin tumors and delaythe appearance of thymic lymphomas induced by high-dose radiation [85]. It has also been reported that low-dose-rate continuous γ irradiation prolonged the life span of both db/db mice (an experimental model for Type II diabetes [86, 87]) and the accelerated aging Klotho mouse model [88]. Exposure to radon water or radon-rich mines has also been reported to alleviate a wide variety of diseases and pains in human with and without concurrent medical treatment [89-91]. A single 10 mGy CT scan or PET scan (7–22 mSv) of Trp53+/− female mice significantly extended the overall lifespan of these mice relative to the controls [92]. Primary conditioning with low doses of radiation was also reported to significantly suppress incidences of teratogenesis induced by a follow-on high dose of radiation [60, 61, 93]. In genetically susceptible ApoE−/− mice with normal p53 function, γ-radiation exposures at doses as low as 25 mGy, given at either an early or late stage of the disease, protected against atherosclerosis in a manner distinctly non-linear with respect to dose [94]. However, in ApoE−/− mice with reduced p53 function (Trp53+/−), exposure at the late stage of the disease, produced generally detrimental effects. These observations suggested the p53 functionality can dramatically alter the outcome of a LDIR exposure [95]. Whole-body low-dose X-ray irradiation of mice was reported to markedly increase anti-tumor response as well as improve the erythrocyte immune function and its ability to carry oxygen [96]. In summary, under certain circumstances, animal experimental data suggests that lLDIR/LDRIR exposure may not only promote fertility and prolong lifespan, but also induce immunological modification, give anti-tumor ability, slow the progression of atherosclerosis, and ameliorate diabetic nephropathy. While it has been suggested that safe supplementation with external low doses of ionizing radiation may produce biopositive effects in mammals [97], more data needs to be generated to validate existing claims of biopositive/hermetic effects of LDIR/LDRIR on humans.

THE MECHANISMS FOR LDIR- OR LDRIR-INDUCED BIONEGATIVE AND BIOPOSITIVE EFFECTS

The mechanisms for LDIR- or LDRIR-induced bionegative effects

The mechanisms for LDIR- or LDRIR-induced bionegative and biopositive effects vary according to animal species, strain, age, sex, organ and cell type exposed, cell metabolism, and cell cycle. The induction of carcinogenesis and cataractogenesis (mentioned previously) in various genetically susceptible mice suggests that the specific genes may be involved in LDIR- or LDRIR-induced carcinogenesis and cataractogenesis respectively. Low doses of radiation from medical diagnostic procedures (0.25–10 mGy) stimulate the expression of interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptors on the surface of peripheral blood lymphocytes taken from normal human donors, a process that could contribute to leukemogenesis [98, 99]. Diminished immune response, increased cellular stress, altered TGFβ1 signaling, inappropriate expression of developmental genes, and upregulation of ITGAX, RELB, SERPINA1, MMP12, FGF13, RSPO1 and FGG have been suggested to be involved in LDIR- or LDRIR–induced mammary gland carcinogenesis [30, 33, 34]. TGFβ1 also mediates tumor promotion of Trp53 null mammary epithelium after LDIR exposure [31]. Induced expression of higher γ-H2AX foci in lymphocytes obtained from a patient at various sampling times post radiotherapy or CT examination suggested that in vivo induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) may occur soon after irradiation [100]. The γ-H2AX assay may be a robust method for measuring DSB damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLs), which can be used to assess mutagen sensitivity and malignant tumor risk [101]. In the central nervous system, nerve growth factor (NGF) protein levels and the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 3 (trkC) (receptor serving to bind neurotrophin-3) mRNA are affected by prenatal irradiation at doses as low as 20 mGy, which may directly affect post-natal brain development [102]. In vitro and in vivo study of radiation response of neural precursor cells suggested that oxidative stress or reactive oxygen species (ROS) may be involved in LDIR- or LDRIR-induced inhibition of neurogenesis in the development of cognitive impairment [103]. This is supported by a recent study that acute low-dose irradiation (from 20 mGy) could elicit significant increases in ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) over several days to weeks. These redox changes could activate NFκB signal transduction, leading to transcriptional activation of superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), which in turn plays a key role in the LDIR induction of oxidative stress response and the ultimate fate of the cell [104]. In the embryonic mouse brain, a statistically significant increase in DNA DSB formation and apoptosis in the embryonic neuronal stem cell compartment occurred after in utero exposure to 10–100 mGy of X-rays, with both end-points showing a linear response. Delayed DSB repair was reported following exposure to doses below 50 mGy as compared with exposure to a higher dose of 100 mGy [105, 106]. An in vitro study indicated that neural stem cells exposed to 10–150 mGy of Fe ions displayed a significant dose-dependent rise in ROS/ RNS levels at 12 and 24 h post irradiation [107]. Low-dose whole-body irradiation at 50 mGy or 75 mGy induced colony-stimulating factor (CSF) secretion from thymocytes and lung cells, respectively. The number of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) receptors on bone marrow cells (BMCs) in mice was also increased significantly. These findings suggested the presence of synergic interaction of CSF and G-CSF, which may play a role in hematopoietic stimulation [108]. LDIR was also reported to induce increases in G-CSF and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) mRNA expression in splenocytes [109]. Irradiation of mice at 75 mGy was also reported to induce IL-12 and IL-18 secretion from macrophages, with paralleled activation of NF-κB as well as upregulated expression of CD14 and TLR4-MD2 on the macrophage surface and MyD88 in the cytoplasm [110]. Analysis of splenic lymphocytes from a mouse subjected to LDRIR, from 1 mGy to 20 mGy/20 h/daily, increased the incidences of chromosome aberrations with a positive dose-rate effect [111, 112]. With a total dose of 50 mGy (at 0.24 mGy/h), Ccl11, Ccr5, Cd80, Inha, and Il9 genes were significantly modulated immediately after irradiation [113]. Irradiation with 100 mGy (0.2 mGy/h) demonstrated significant enhancement of expression of Il27 and Tcfcp2 genes, whereas Inha and Socs5 genes were downregulated in CD4+ T cells immediately after irradiation at doses of 10 mGy and 100 mGy respectively [114]. After 10 mGy at a dose rate of 1 mGy/h, Ccr5, Cd40, Cebpb, Igsf6 and Tnfsf4 genes were upregulated, whereas Il4ra, Mapk8 and Nfkb1 genes were downregulated immediately after irradiation. After 100 mGy, upregulation of Ccr4, Cd40, Cebpb, Cxcr3, Socs5, Stat4, Tbx21, Tnfrsf4 and Tnfsf4 genes were observed. These findings suggested that the pattern of gene expression in CD4+ T cells was significantly modified after protracted low-dose proton irradiation, with the modifications highly dependent upon the total dose and dose rate of irradiation [115]. Very low dose rate γ-irradiation (100 mGy/year) was also reported to result in a significant decrease in levels of IgG1, IgG2b and IgG2a at 12, 18 and 24 months post irradiation respectively while the total number of B-cells within the spleen remained unchanged [116]. In addition, mouse lymphocytes subjected to LDIR were observed to have increased intracellular calcium ions and stimulated protein kinase C (PKC) activities [117]. As PKC is a common pathway for many signal transduction systems involved in apoptosis, such as radiation-induced ATM, P53, ceramide, and c-Abl activations [118], analysis of PKC activities in radiation-induced cellular responses may provide many clues for understanding the mechanism of radiation-induced biopositive and bionegative effects.

The mechanisms for LDIR- or LDRIR-induced biopositive effects

At low doses, ionizing radiation induces stress proteins and prostaglandins, which are involved in stabilizing the signal transduction, transcriptional and translational machineries [119]. It also induces SOD activities in immune organs of the irradiated rats [120], detoxification of ROS [121], and high-fidelity repair of DNA damage [122, 123], which may help explain how LDIR or LDRIR protect chromosomal damage from a subsequent high radiation dose [124], from spontaneous mutations occurrence [19, 125] and from spontaneous neoplastic decreases, and provide a novel explanation for how LDIR/LDRIR reduces the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a level below the spontaneous transformation rate [125-128]. Extension of tumor latency in cancer-prone mice [129, 130], activation of the immune response [119, 131, 132] and suppression of metastasis [133] and spontaneous cancers in humans [134, 135] were also observed after LDIR or LDRIR exposure. LDRIR was reported to significantly increase plasma calcium concentration in Klotho gene mutant mice, and concomitantly increase hepatic catalase activity and prolong the lifespan of mice [88]. Low-LET X-ray radiation (12 mGy/day; 84 mGy total) caused a significant offspring coat color shift towards pseudo-agouti and discordant methylation between experimental and control mice of the same coat color class during the first seven days of gestation in Agouti viable yellow (Avy) mice. The exposure timing (Day 4.5 of gestation, or GD 4.5) coincides with post-fertilization epigenome-wide reprogramming, a window of vulnerability for exposure to epigenetic toxicants and environmental factors. LDIR increased the methylation at several loci, including imprinted genes of Avy mice. Males were more affected at the Avyallele, while sex did not play a factor for the other loci examined. The findings provided evidence that in the isogenic Avy mouse model, epigenetic alterations resulting from LDIR played a role in radiation hormesis [136]. Furthermore, epigenetic alteration, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phospho-c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and P53-related signal transduction pathways, clusterin gene expression may also be involved in LDIR- or LDRIR-induced beneficial effects [136-138]. In the mouse immune system, LDIR induced activation of lymphocytes through signals transmitted from antigen-presenting cells (APCs), including the upregulated surface molecules CD48, CD80, CD86 and increased IL-12, IL-1beta, tumor necrosis factor receptor alpha (TNFα), decreased cAMP/cGMP ratio, and downregulated the PLA2-PGE2 (phospholipase2-prostaglandin E2) pathway [132]. In the retina, the reported LDIR/LDRIR-induced upregulation of antioxidative gene peroxiredoxin-2 (Prdx2) could be applied as a novel therapeutic concept for retinitis pigmentosa and for other progressive neurodegenerative diseases regardless of the mechanism of degeneration involved [139]. FOXO, SIRT1, JNK, ATM, ATR and p53 genes have been demonstrated to play essential roles in hormesis and radiation adaptive response in the whole organism of Drosophila melanogaster [140]. In the rat mesenchymal stem cell (MSC), the MAPK/ERK pathway may be involved in LDIR-induced MSC proliferations [141].

CONCLUSIONS

In our review of animal experimental studies involving the application of three different protocols for ionizing radiation exposures, i.e. (i) LDIR (<100 mSv) followed by high-dose-rate ionizing radiation exposure, (ii) LDIR with low dose rate (<6 mSv/h) ionizing radiation (LDRIR with low cumulative dose), and (iii) LDRIR with high accumulated radiation dose, we observed that all the radiation exposures induced either bionegative or biopositive effects on fertility, tumorigenesis, and lifespan depending on genetic background, age, sex, nature of radiation exposure (i.e. acute or chronic irradiation), type of ionizing radiation applied, experimental design and statistical methodology used. Radiation exposures also induce genetic and epigenetic changes, cataractogenesis and abnormal neurogenesis in the brain. At the molecular level, LDIR-induced ROS, inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and downregulation of various neurotrophic factors resulted in the impairment of neurogenesis and cerebrovascular diseases, resulting in loss of cognitive functions. Diminished immune response, increased cellular stress, altered TGFβ1 signaling, inappropriate expression of developmental genes, and upregulation of ITGAX, RELB, SERPINA1, MMP12, FGF13, RSPO1 and FGG may be involved in LDIR- or LDRIR-induced mammary gland carcinogenesis. Upregulation of genes for cell surface receptors linked to signal transduction such as Alk, Cd30 and Il2ra, which reduce DNA mismatch repair, may be involved in the occurrence of malignant lymphomas arising from LDIR/LDRIR exposure. On the other hand, epigenetic alteration, ATM, ERK, MAPK, JNK and P53-related signal transduction pathways, and clusterin gene expression may be involved in LDIR- or LDRIR-induced biopositive effects. While LDIR from LDRIR (LDRIR or LDRIR with accumulated LDIR) induced bionegative health effects, most of the previous studies used LDIR with high-dose-rate ionizing radiation or LDRIR with high accumulated dose radiation exposure (refer to Tables 1–7). Hence, additional studies evaluating the health effects posed by LDIR with LDRIR are urgently needed. The development of sensitive biomarkers for detecting early pathophysiological changes induced by LDIR with LDRIR may provide some clues, not only for early diagnosis or detection of radiation exposure but also for the prevention of disease development. Evaluation of LDIR- and LDRIR-induced bionegative effects in radiosensitive animal populations may elucidate molecular mechanisms for LDIR- and LDRIR-induced human diseases. Further investigation and confirmation of LDIR- and LDRIR-induced biopositive effects may provide information for the development of cheap and effective therapeutic approaches for preventing or controlling chronic human diseases.
  130 in total

Review 1.  Health effects of the Chernobyl accident: fears, rumours and the truth.

Authors:  Mati Rahu
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Further study of prolongation of life span associated with immunological modification by chronic low-dose-rate irradiation in MRL-lpr/lpr mice: effects of whole-life irradiation.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ina; Kazuo Sakai
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Radiation hormesis and radioadaptive response in Drosophila melanogaster flies with different genetic backgrounds: the role of cellular stress-resistance mechanisms.

Authors:  A A Moskalev; E N Plyusnina; M V Shaposhnikov
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.277

4.  Fractionated low-dose radiation exposure leads to accumulation of DNA damage and profound alterations in DNA and histone methylation in the murine thymus.

Authors:  Igor Pogribny; Igor Koturbash; Volodymyr Tryndyak; Darryl Hudson; Sandie M L Stevenson; Olga Sedelnikova; William Bonner; Olga Kovalchuk
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Database of radiogenic cancer in experimental animals exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Philippe Duport; Huixia Jiang; Natalia S Shilnikova; Daniel Krewski; Jan M Zielinski
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Neuron loss during early adulthood following prenatal low-dose X-irradiation in the mouse brain.

Authors:  H Korr; H Thorsten Rohde; J Benders; M Dafotakis; N Grolms; C Schmitz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.694

7.  Influence of continuous, very low-dose gamma-irradiation on the mouse immune system.

Authors:  M Courtade; A Caratero; S Jozan; B Pipy; C Caratero
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.694

8.  Radiophobia: long-term psychological consequences of Chernobyl.

Authors:  Ross H Pastel
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Prolongation of life span in the accelerated aging klotho mouse model, by low-dose-rate continuous γ irradiation.

Authors:  Takaharu Nomura; Kazuo Sakai; Hiromitsu Ogata; Junji Magae
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  In vivo mutagenic effect of very low dose radiation.

Authors:  Pamela J Sykes; Tanya K Day; Sarah J Swinburne; Joanne M Lane; Alexander A Morley; Antony M Hooker; Madhava Bhat
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

View more
  22 in total

1.  Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening.

Authors:  Hongxiang Mu; Jing Sun; Linwei Li; Jie Yin; Nan Hu; Weichao Zhao; Dexin Ding; Lan Yi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Selenium Nanoparticles Synergize with Low Dose of Gamma Radiation to Suppress Mammary Gland Carcinogenesis via Regulation of Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Omayma A R Abozaid; Laila A Rashed; Sawsan M El-Sonbaty; Amira I Abu-Elftouh; Esraa S A Ahmed
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Association between low doses of ionizing radiation, administered acutely or chronically, and time to onset of stroke in a rat model.

Authors:  Norio Takahashi; Munechika Misumi; Hideko Murakami; Yasuharu Niwa; Waka Ohishi; Toshiya Inaba; Akiko Nagamachi; Gen Suzuki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  The effect of well-characterized, very low-dose x-ray radiation on fibroblasts.

Authors:  Katelyn Truong; Suzanne Bradley; Bryana Baginski; Joseph R Wilson; Donald Medlin; Leon Zheng; R Kevin Wilson; Matthew Rusin; Endre Takacs; Delphine Dean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Health Impacts of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation: Current Scientific Debates and Regulatory Issues.

Authors:  Alexander Vaiserman; Alexander Koliada; Oksana Zabuga; Yehoshua Socol
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Spatiotemporal association of low birth weight with Cs-137 deposition at the prefecture level in Japan after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accidents: an analytical-ecologic epidemiological study.

Authors:  Hagen Scherb; Keiji Hayashi
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Biological Effects of Continuous Low-Dose-Rate Irradiation in Silkworms and Mice: Growth Promotion and Tumor Transplantability.

Authors:  Masahiro Nakashima; Chikao Sugie; Zhen Wang; Takuhito Kondo; Yoshihiko Manabe; Taro Murai; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Reduction of Delayed Homologous Recombination by Induction of Radioadaptive Response in RaDR-GFP Mice (Yonezawa Effect): An Old Player With a New Role.

Authors:  Cuihua Liu; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Kaoru Tanaka; Fazliana Mohd Saaya; Mitsuru Nenoi; Akira Fujimori; Bing Wang
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.623

9.  Low dose radiation prevents doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  Xin Jiang; Yaqiong Hong; Di Zhao; Xinxin Meng; Lijing Zhao; Yanwei Du; Zan Wang; Yan Zheng; Lu Cai; Hongyu Jiang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-12-07

Review 10.  Overview of Biological, Epidemiological, and Clinical Evidence of Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.