Literature DB >> 18648632

Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Bobby R Scott1.   

Abstract

New research data for low-dose, low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation-induced, stochastic effects (mutations and neoplastic transformations) are modeled using the recently published NEOTRANS(3) model. The model incorporates a protective, stochastic threshold (StoThresh) at low doses for activating cooperative protective processes considered to include presumptive p53-dependent, high-fidelity repair of nuclear DNA damage in competition with presumptive p53-dependent apoptosis and a novel presumptive p53-independent protective apoptosis mediated (PAM) process which selectively removes genomically compromised cells (mutants, neoplastic transformants, micronucleated cells, etc.). The protective StoThresh are considered to fall in a relatively narrow low-dose zone (Transition Zone A). Below Transition Zone A is the ultra-low-dose region where it is assumed that only low-fidelity DNA repair is activated along with presumably apoptosis. For this zone there is evidence for an increase in mutations with increases in dose. Just above Transition Zone A, a Zone of Maximal Protection (suppression of stochastic effects) arises and is attributed to maximal cooperation of high-fidelity, DNA repair/apoptosis and the PAM process. The width of the Zone of Maximal Protection depends on low-LET radiation dose rate and appears to depend on photon radiation energy. Just above the Zone of Maximal Protection is Transition Zone B, where deleterious StoThresh for preventing the PAM process fall. Just above Transition Zone B is a zone of moderate doses where complete inhibition of the PAM process appears to occur. However, for both Transition Zone B and the zone of complete inhibition of the PAM process, high-fidelity DNA repair/apoptosis are presumed to still operate. The indicated protective and deleterious StoThresh lead to nonlinear, hormetic-type dose-response relationships for low-LET radiation-induced mutations, neoplastic transformation and, presumably, also for cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low dose radiation; nonlinearity; stochastic effects

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648632      PMCID: PMC2477202          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.003.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  27 in total

1.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

Review 2.  Elimination of transformed cells by normal cells: a novel concept for the control of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  G Bauer
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Zero tumor incidence in mice after repeated lifetime exposures to 0.5 Gy of beta radiation.

Authors:  A Ootsuyama; H Tanooka
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Resistance to tgf-Beta-induced elimination of transformed-cells is required during tumor progression (review-hypothesis).

Authors:  G Bauer
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.650

5.  Low doses of radiation increase the latency of spontaneous lymphomas and spinal osteosarcomas in cancer-prone, radiation-sensitive Trp53 heterozygous mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; J S Jackson; D P Morrison; S M Carlisle
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb survivors study.

Authors:  G R Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Oral administration of tritiated water (HTO) in mouse. III: Low dose-rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk.

Authors:  O Yamamoto; T Seyama; H Itoh; N Fujimoto
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Low-dose radiation-induced protective process and implications for risk assessment, cancer prevention, and cancer therapy.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  17 in total

1.  Modeling DNA double-strand break repair kinetics as an epiregulated cell-community-wide (epicellcom) response to radiation stress.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Special issue introduction.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Stochastic threshold microdose model for cell killing by insoluble metallic nanomaterial particles.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Extremely low doses of X-radiation can induce adaptive responses in mouse prostate.

Authors:  Tanya K Day; Guoxin Zeng; Antony M Hooker; Madhava Bhat; David R Turner; Pamela J Sykes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Evidence for radiation hormesis after in vitro exposure of human lymphocytes to low doses of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Low-radiation environment affects the development of protection mechanisms in V79 cells.

Authors:  E Fratini; C Carbone; D Capece; G Esposito; G Simone; M A Tabocchini; M Tomasi; M Belli; L Satta
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 1.925

10.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.