Literature DB >> 18648588

Enhancement of bio-protective functions by low dose/dose-rate radiation.

Kazuo Sakai1, Takaharu Nomura, Yasuhiro Ina.   

Abstract

Effects of low-dose-rate gamma-irradiation on the process of tumorigenesis were investigated in mice treated with a carcinogenic agent or irradiated with high dose X-rays at a high dose rate. A prolonged gamma irradiation at approximately 1 mGy/hr suppressed the appearance of skin tumors induced by methylcholanthrene and delayed the appearance of radiation-induced thymic lymphomas in C57BL/6 mice. We also investigated the effects of low-dose-rate irradiation on disease model mice. In Type II diabetic C57BL/KsJ-db/db (db) mice, the urine glucose level was improved in some of the mice irradiated at 0.70 mGy/hr, but not in non-irradiated control mice. In MRL-lpr/lpr (lpr) mice with severe autoimmune diseases, immunological status was kept better in the mice irradiated at 0.35 or 1.2 mGy/hr. The incidence of a number of symptoms, including lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly and proteinuria, was suppressed by the irradiation. Furthermore, in both of the strains, the low-dose-rate irradiation prolonged the life span of the irradiated mice.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648588      PMCID: PMC2477679          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-115.Sakai

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  12 in total

Review 1.  Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing.

Authors:  T Finkel; N J Holbrook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Prolongation of life span associated with immunological modification by chronic low-dose-rate irradiation in MRL-lpr/lpr mice.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ina; Kazuo Sakai
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Low-dose gamma-ray irradiation reduces oxidative damage induced by CCl4 in mouse liver.

Authors:  T Nomura; K Yamaoka
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Apoptosis and the adaptive response in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  S P Cregan; D L Brown; R E Mitchel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Application of a newly developed photoluminescence glass dosimeter for measuring the absorbed dose in individual mice exposed to low-dose rate 137Cs gamma-rays.

Authors:  Y Hoshi; T Nomura; T Oda; T Iwasaki; K Fujita; T Ishikawa; A Kato; T Ikegami; K Sakai; H Tanooka; T Yamada
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.724

6.  Induction of mRNAs for glutathione synthesis-related proteins in mouse liver by low doses of gamma-rays.

Authors:  S Kojima; O Matsuki; T Nomura; A Kubodera; Y Honda; S Honda; H Tanooka; H Wakasugi; K Yamaoka
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1998-08-24

7.  A Y chromosome associated factor in strain BXSB producing accelerated autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation.

Authors:  E D Murphy; J B Roths
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1979-11

8.  Mice chronically exposed to low dose ionizing radiation possess splenocytes with elevated levels of HSP70 mRNA, HSC70 and HSP72 and with an increased capacity to proliferate.

Authors:  M Nogami; J T Huang; S J James; J M Lubinski; L T Nakamura; T Makinodan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Diabetes, a new mutation in the mouse.

Authors:  K P Hummel; M M Dickie; D L Coleman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-02       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dose response and growth rates of subcutaneous tumors induced with 3-methylcholanthrene in mice and timing of tumor origin.

Authors:  H Tanooka; K Tanaka; H Arimoto
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  18 in total

1.  Computational modeling of signaling pathways mediating cell cycle checkpoint control and apoptotic responses to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yuchao Zhao; In Chio Lou; Rory B Conolly
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Cellular stress responses, the hormesis paradigm, and vitagenes: novel targets for therapeutic intervention in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Vittorio Calabrese; Carolin Cornelius; Albena T Dinkova-Kostova; Edward J Calabrese; Mark P Mattson
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Alexander M Vaiserman
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Cellular stress responses, mitostress and carnitine insufficiencies as critical determinants in aging and neurodegenerative disorders: role of hormesis and vitagenes.

Authors:  Vittorio Calabrese; Carolin Cornelius; Anna Maria Giuffrida Stella; Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.996

Review 6.  Cancer risk at low doses of ionizing radiation: artificial neural networks inference from atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Masao S Sasaki; Akira Tachibana; Shunichi Takeda
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low-dose-radiation stimulated natural chemical and biological protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Low-dose gamma-radiation inhibits benzo[a]pyrene-induced lung adenoma development in a/j mice.

Authors:  Veronica R Bruce; Steven A Belinsky; Katherine Gott; Yushi Liu; Thomas March; Bobby Scott; Julie Wilder
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Small γ-Ray Doses Prevent Rather than Increase Lung Tumors in Mice.

Authors:  B R Scott; V R Bruce; K M Gott; J Wilder; T March
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.