Literature DB >> 12775447

Low doses of diagnostic energy X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro.

J L Redpath1, Q Lu, X Lao, S Molloi, E Elmore.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of low doses of 60 kVp X-rays on in vitro transformation frequency.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: HeLa x skin fibroblast human hybrid cells were used to assay transformation from the non-tumorigenic to the tumorigenic phenotype. Subconfluent cultures of cells were exposed to a range of doses of 60 kVp X-rays and seeded for assay of transformation after 24 h post-irradiation holding. Experiments were repeated at least three times and the data pooled for analysis. Transformation frequencies were compared with those of sham-irradiated controls.
RESULTS: At doses < 1 cGy, the observed transformation frequencies were significantly less than those seen in unirradiated cells.
CONCLUSION: Low doses (< 1 cGy) of 60 kVp X-rays protect HeLa x skin fibroblast human hybrid cells against neoplastic transformation in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12775447     DOI: 10.1080/0955300031000096306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  28 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells.

Authors:  W Göggelmann; C Jacobsen; W Panzer; L Walsh; H Roos; E Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Response to the comment on "re-evaluation of the RBE of 29 kV x-rays (mammography x-rays) relative to 220 kV x-rays using neoplastic transformation of human CGL1-hybrid cells" by W. Göggelmann, C. Jacobsen, W. Panzer, L. Walsh, H. Roos, E. Schmid (2003) Radiat Environ Biophys 42:175-182.

Authors:  Ernst Schmid
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  A stochastic markov model of cellular response to radiation.

Authors:  Krzysztof Wojciech Fornalski; Ludwik Dobrzyński; Marek Krzysztof Janiak
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Suppression of neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low LET radiation.

Authors:  J Leslie Redpath
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model.

Authors:  Helmut Schöllnberger; Peter M Eckl
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.