Literature DB >> 15447037

The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation.

Antony M Hooker1, Madhava Bhat, Tanya K Day, Joanne M Lane, Sarah J Swinburne, Alexander A Morley, Pamela J Sykes.   

Abstract

Almost all of the data on the biological effects of ionizing radiation come from studies of high doses. However, the human population is unlikely to be exposed to such doses. Regulatory limits for radiation exposure are based on the linear no-threshold model, which predicts that the relationship between biological effects and radiation dose is linear, and that any dose has some effect. Chromosomal changes are an important effect of ionizing radiation because of their role in carcinogenesis. Here we exposed pKZ1 mice to single whole-body X-radiation doses as low as 1 microGy. We observed three different phases of response: (1) an induction of inversions at ultra-low doses, (2) a reduction below endogenous inversion frequency at low doses, and (3) an induction of inversions again at higher doses. These results do not fit a linear no-threshold model, and they may have implications for the way in which regulatory standards are presently set and for understanding radiation effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15447037     DOI: 10.1667/rr3228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  36 in total

1.  Threshold of biologic responses of the small airway epithelium to low levels of tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Yael Strulovici-Barel; Larsson Omberg; Michael O'Mahony; Cynthia Gordon; Charleen Hollmann; Ann E Tilley; Jacqueline Salit; Jason Mezey; Ben-Gary Harvey; Ronald G Crystal
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Effects of acute low doses of gamma-radiation on erythrocytes membrane.

Authors:  Sherif S Mahmoud; Eman El-Sakhawy; Eman S Abdel-Fatah; Adel M Kelany; Rizk M Rizk
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 3.  Twilight effects of low doses of ionizing radiation on cellular systems: a bird's eye view on current concepts and research.

Authors:  Ilaria Postiglione; Angela Chiaviello; Giuseppe Palumbo
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  A perspective on the scientific, philosophical, and policy dimensions of hormesis.

Authors:  George R Hoffmann
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  The PKZ1 recombination mutation assay: a sensitive assay for low dose studies.

Authors:  P J Sykes; A A Morley; A M Hooker
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  A review: Development of a microdose model for analysis of adaptive response and bystander dose response behavior.

Authors:  Bobby E Leonard
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Stochastic thresholds: a novel explanation of nonlinear dose-response relationships for stochastic radiobiological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Extremely low doses of X-radiation can induce adaptive responses in mouse prostate.

Authors:  Tanya K Day; Guoxin Zeng; Antony M Hooker; Madhava Bhat; David R Turner; Pamela J Sykes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.658

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.