Literature DB >> 16982072

Non-linear chromosomal inversion response in prostate after low dose X-radiation exposure.

Guoxin Zeng1, Tanya K Day, Antony M Hooker, Benjamin J Blyth, Madhava Bhat, Wayne D Tilley, Pamela J Sykes.   

Abstract

Somatic intrachromosomal recombination can result in inversions and deletions in DNA, which are important mutations in cancer. The pKZ1 chromosomal inversion assay is a sensitive assay for studying the effects of DNA damaging agents using chromosomal inversion as a mutation end-point. We have previously demonstrated that the chromosomal inversion response in pKZ1 spleen after single low doses of X-radiation exposure does not follow the linear no-threshold dose-response model. Here, we optimised a chromosomal inversion screening method to study the effect of low dose X-radiation exposure in pKZ1 prostatic tissue. In the present study, a significant induction in inversions was observed after ultra-low doses of 0.005-0.01 mGy or after a high dose of 1000 mGy, whereas a reduction in inversions to below the sham-treated frequency was observed between 1 and 10 mGy exposure. This is the first report of a reduction to below endogenous frequency for any mutation end-point in prostate. In addition, the doses of radiation studied were at least three orders of magnitude lower than have been reported in other mutation assays in prostate in vivo or in vitro. In sham-treated pKZ1 controls and in pKZ1 mice treated with low doses of 1-10 mGy the number of inversions/gland cross-section rarely exceeded three. Up to 4 and 7 inversions were observed in individual prostatic gland cross-sections after doses < or =0.02 mGy and after 1000 mGy, respectively. The number of inversions identified in individual cross-sections of prostatic glands of untreated mice and all treated mice other than the 1000 mGy treatment group followed a Poisson distribution. The dose-response curves and fold changes observed after all radiation doses studied were similar in spleen and prostate. These results suggest that the pKZ1 assay is measuring a fundamental response to DNA damage after low dose X-radiation exposure which is independent of tissue type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982072     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  14 in total

1.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data.

Authors:  Maurice Tubiana; Ludwig E Feinendegen; Chichuan Yang; Joseph M Kaminski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  No Evidence for the In Vivo Induction of Genomic Instability by Low Doses of CS Gamma Rays in Bone Marrow Cells of BALB/CJ and C57BL/6J Mice.

Authors:  Kanokporn Noy Rithidech; Chatchanok Udomtanakunchai; Louise M Honikel; Elbert B Whorton
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  The new radiobiology: returning to our roots.

Authors:  Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  The dose window for radiation-induced protective adaptive responses.

Authors:  Ronald E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Human Health and the Biological Effects of Tritium in Drinking Water: Prudent Policy Through Science - Addressing the ODWAC New Recommendation.

Authors:  S Dingwall; C E Mills; N Phan; K Taylor; D R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  Requirements for identification of low dose and non-linear mutagenic responses to ionising radiation.

Authors:  Pamela J Sykes; Tanya K Day
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  A single whole-body low dose X-irradiation does not affect L1, B1 and IAP repeat element DNA methylation longitudinally.

Authors:  Michelle R Newman; Pamela J Sykes; Benjamin J Blyth; Eva Bezak; Mark D Lawrence; Katherine L Morel; Rebecca J Ormsby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Adaption By Low Dose Radiation Exposure: A Look at Scope and Limitations for Radioprotection.

Authors:  Ron E J Mitchel
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 10.  The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; David G Hoel; R Julian Preston
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.