Literature DB >> 18648587

In vivo mutagenic effect of very low dose radiation.

Pamela J Sykes1, Tanya K Day, Sarah J Swinburne, Joanne M Lane, Alexander A Morley, Antony M Hooker, Madhava Bhat.   

Abstract

Almost all of our knowledge about the mutational effect of radiation has come from high dose studies which are generally not relevant to public exposure. The pKZ1 mouse recombination mutagenesis assay enables study of the mutational effect of very low doses of low LET radiation (microGy to cGy range) in a whole animal model. The mutational end-point studied is chromosomal inversion which is a common mutation in cancer. We have observed 1) a non-linear dose response of induced inversions in pKZ1 mice exposed to a wide dose range of low LET radiation, 2) the ability of low priming doses to cause an adaptive response to subsequent higher test doses and 3) the effect of genetic susceptibility where animals that are heterozygous for the Ataxia Telangiectasia gene (Atm) exhibit different responses to low dose radiation compared to their normal litter-mates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive response; Chromosomal inversion; Transgenic mouse mutagenesis model; X-radiation

Year:  2006        PMID: 18648587      PMCID: PMC2477678          DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.06-004.Sykes

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dose Response        ISSN: 1559-3258            Impact factor:   2.658


  17 in total

1.  Atm haploinsufficiency results in increased sensitivity to sublethal doses of ionizing radiation in mice.

Authors:  C Barlow; M A Eckhaus; A A Schäffer; A Wynshaw-Boris
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Aspects of the adaptive response to very low doses of radiation and other agents.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-11-04       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL; 10-300 kV generating potential). Institution of Physics and Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Induction of somatic intrachromosomal recombination inversion events by cyclophosphamide in a transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  P J Sykes; A M Hooker; C S Harrington; A K Jacobs; L Kingsbury; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1998-02-02       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Pleiotropic defects in ataxia-telangiectasia protein-deficient mice.

Authors:  A Elson; Y Wang; C J Daugherty; C C Morton; F Zhou; J Campos-Torres; P Leder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dose-dependent increase or decrease of somatic intrachromosomal recombination produced by etoposide.

Authors:  Antony M Hooker; Rachel Horne; Alexander A Morley; Pamela J Sykes; Rachael Home
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Spontaneous and X-ray-induced deletion mutations in a LacZ plasmid-based transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  J A Gossen; H J Martus; J Y Wei; J Vijg
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  A comparison of the radiosensitivity of lymphocytes from normal donors, cancer patients, individuals with ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) and A-T heterozygotes.

Authors:  C M West; S A Elyan; P Berry; R Cowan; D Scott
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Radiation-induced point mutations, deletions and micronuclei in lacI transgenic mice.

Authors:  R A Winegar; L H Lutze; J D Hamer; K G O'Loughlin; J C Mirsalis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 10.  The adaptive response in radiobiology: evolving insights and implications.

Authors:  S Wolff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

1.  Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Authors:  Daniel P Hayes
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Leon Mullenders; Mike Atkinson; Herwig Paretzke; Laure Sabatier; Simon Bouffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Global gene expression responses to low- or high-dose radiation in a human three-dimensional tissue model.

Authors:  Alexandre Mezentsev; Sally A Amundson
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Radiation exposure from imaging tests: is there an increased cancer risk?

Authors:  Patricia K Nguyen; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2011-02

5.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models.

Authors:  Feng Ru Tang; Weng Keong Loke; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  The Lowest Radiation Dose Having Molecular Changes in the Living Body.

Authors:  Noriko Shimura; Shuji Kojima
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low Radiation Environment Switches the Overgrowth-Induced Cell Apoptosis Toward Autophagy.

Authors:  Mariafausta Fischietti; Emiliano Fratini; Daniela Verzella; Davide Vecchiotti; Daria Capece; Barbara Di Francesco; Giuseppe Esposito; Marco Balata; Luca Ioannuci; Pamela Sykes; Luigi Satta; Francesca Zazzeroni; Alessandra Tessitore; Maria Antonella Tabocchini; Edoardo Alesse
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-12

9.  It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.

Authors:  John J Cardarelli; Brant A Ulsh
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.658

10.  Low doses of ionizing radiation enhance angiogenesis and consequently accelerate post-embryonic development but not regeneration in zebrafish.

Authors:  Filipa G Marques; Lara Carvalho; Joana S Sousa; José Rino; Isabel Diegues; Esmeralda Poli; Filomena Pina; Leonor Saúde; Susana Constantino Rosa Santos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.