Literature DB >> 28039881

Deriving depth-dependent light escape efficiency and optical Swank factor from measured pulse height spectra of scintillators.

Adrian Howansky1, Boyu Peng1, Anthony R Lubinsky1, Wei Zhao1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pulse height spectroscopy has been used by investigators to deduce the imaging properties of scintillators. Pulse height spectra (PHS) are used to compute the Swank factor, which describes the variation in scintillator light output per x-ray interaction. The spread in PHS measured below the K-edge is related to the optical component of the Swank factor, i.e., variations in light escape efficiency from different depths of x-ray interaction in the scintillator, denoted ε¯(z). Optimizing scintillators for medical imaging applications requires understanding of these optical properties, as they determine tradeoffs between parameters such as x-ray absorption, light yield, and spatial resolution. This work develops a model for PHS acquisition such that the effect of measurement uncertainty can be removed. This method allows ε¯(z) to be quantified on an absolute scale and permits more accurate estimation of the optical Swank factor of scintillators.
METHODS: The pulse height spectroscopy acquisition chain was modeled as a linear system of stochastic gain stages. Analytical expressions were derived for signal and noise propagation through the PHS chain, accounting for deterministic and stochastic aspects of x-ray absorption, scintillation, and light detection with a photomultiplier tube. The derived expressions were used to calculate PHS of thallium-doped cesium iodide (CsI) scintillators using parameters that were measured, calculated, or known from literature. PHS were measured at 25 and 32 keV of CsI samples designed with an optically reflective or absorptive backing, with or without a fiber-optic faceplate (FOP), and with thicknesses ranging from 150-1000 μm. Measured PHS were compared with calculated PHS, then light escape model parameters were varied until measured and modeled results reached agreement. Resulting estimates of ε¯(z) were used to calculate each scintillator's optical Swank factor.
RESULTS: For scintillators of the same optical design, only minor differences in light escape efficiency were observed between samples with different thickness. As thickness increased, escape efficiency decreased by up to 20% for interactions furthest away from light collection. Optical design (i.e., backing and FOP) predominantly affected the magnitude and relative variation in ε¯(z). Depending on interaction depth and scintillator thickness, samples with an absorptive backing and FOP were estimated to yield 4.1-13.4 photons/keV. Samples with a reflective backing and FOP yielded 10.4-18.4 keV-1 , while those with a reflective backing and no FOP yielded 29.5-52.0 keV-1 . Optical Swank factors were approximately 0.9 and near-unity in samples featuring an absorptive or reflective backing, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This work uses a modeling approach to remove the noise introduced by the measurement apparatus from measured PHS. This method allows absolute quantification of ε¯(z) and more accurate estimation of the optical Swank factor of scintillators. The method was applied to CsI scintillators with different thickness and optical design, and determined that optical design more strongly affects ε¯(z) and Swank factor than differences in CsI thickness. Despite large variations in ε¯(z) between optical designs, the Swank factor of all evaluated samples is above 0.9. Information provided by this methodology can help validate Monte Carlo simulations of structured CsI and optimize scintillator design for x-ray imaging applications.
© 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Swank factor; cesium iodide; digital radiography; indirect detection; pulse height spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28039881      PMCID: PMC5573598          DOI: 10.1002/mp.12083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  24 in total

Review 1.  Inorganic scintillators in medical imaging.

Authors:  Carel W E van Eijk
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-04-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A fast, angle-dependent, analytical model of CsI detector response for optimization of 3D x-ray breast imaging systems.

Authors:  Melanie Freed; Subok Park; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Screen optics effects on detective quantum efficiency in digital radiography: zero-frequency effects.

Authors:  A R Lubinsky; Wei Zhao; Goran Ristic; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Anisotropic imaging performance in indirect x-ray imaging detectors.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Iacovos S Kyprianou; Josep Sempau
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  X-ray imaging with amorphous selenium: pulse height measurements of avalanche gain fluctuations.

Authors:  Brian J M Lui; D C Hunt; A Reznik; K Tanioka; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors.

Authors:  G Hajdok; J Yao; J J Battista; I A Cunningham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems.

Authors:  I A Cunningham; M S Westmore; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers.

Authors:  J A Rowlands; K W Taylor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Goran Ristic; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Photon Counting Energy Dispersive Detector Arrays for X-ray Imaging.

Authors:  Jan S Iwanczyk; Einar Nygård; Oded Meirav; Jerry Arenson; William C Barber; Neal E Hartsough; Nail Malakhov; Jan C Wessel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.679

View more
  5 in total

1.  Back-irradiated and dual-screen sandwich detector configurations for radiography.

Authors:  Anthony R Lubinsky; Adrian Howansky; Hao Zheng; Wei Zhao
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-07-09

2.  Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd2 O2 S:Tb indirect flat panel detector x-ray imaging performance in front- and back-irradiation geometries.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; Anastasiia Mishchenko; A R Lubinsky; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  An apparatus and method for directly measuring the depth-dependent gain and spatial resolution of turbid scintillators.

Authors:  Adrian Howansky; A R Lubinsky; Katsuhiko Suzuki; S Ghose; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Toward Scintillator High-Gain Avalanche Rushing Photoconductor Active Matrix Flat Panel Imager (SHARP-AMFPI): Initial fabrication and characterization.

Authors:  James R Scheuermann; Adrian Howansky; Marc Hansroul; Sébastien Léveillé; Kenkichi Tanioka; Wei Zhao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Modeling and evaluation of a high-resolution CMOS detector for cone-beam CT of the extremities.

Authors:  Qian Cao; Alejandro Sisniega; Michael Brehler; J Webster Stayman; John Yorkston; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; Wojciech Zbijewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.