Literature DB >> 28035576

Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity.

Tucker Tomlinson1, Lee E Miller2,3,4.   

Abstract

The dramatic advances in efferent neural interfaces over the past decade are remarkable, with cortical signals used to allow paralyzed patients to control the movement of a prosthetic limb or even their own hand. However, this success has thrown into relief, the relative lack of progress in our ability to restore somatosensation to these same patients. Somatosensation, including proprioception, the sense of limb position and movement, plays a crucial role in even basic motor tasks like reaching and walking. Its loss results in crippling deficits. Historical work dating back decades and even centuries has demonstrated that modality-specific sensations can be elicited by activating the central nervous system electrically. Recent work has focused on the challenge of refining these sensations by stimulating the somatosensory cortex (S1) directly. Animals are able to detect particular patterns of stimulation and even associate those patterns with particular sensory cues. Most of this work has involved areas of the somatosensory cortex that mediate the sense of touch. Very little corresponding work has been done for proprioception. Here we describe the effort to develop afferent neural interfaces through spatiotemporally precise intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). We review what is known of the cortical representation of proprioception, and describe recent work in our lab that demonstrates for the first time, that sensations like those of natural proprioception may be evoked by ICMS in S1. These preliminary findings are an important first step to the development of an afferent cortical interface to restore proprioception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS); Prosthesis; Somatosensation; Somatosensory cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035576      PMCID: PMC5452683          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  92 in total

1.  An optogenetic toolbox designed for primates.

Authors:  Ilka Diester; Matthew T Kaufman; Murtaza Mogri; Ramin Pashaie; Werapong Goo; Ofer Yizhar; Charu Ramakrishnan; Karl Deisseroth; Krishna V Shenoy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Mathematical models of proprioceptors. I. Control and transduction in the muscle spindle.

Authors:  Milana P Mileusnic; Ian E Brown; Ning Lan; Gerald E Loeb
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Direct comparison of the task-dependent discharge of M1 in hand space and muscle space.

Authors:  M M Morrow; L R Jordan; L E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  "Braille" reading by a blind volunteer by visual cortex stimulation.

Authors:  W H Dobelle; M G Mladejovsky; J R Evans; T S Roberts; J P Girvin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency.

Authors:  C M Murasugi; C D Salzman; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Motor deficits in patients with large-fiber sensory neuropathy.

Authors:  J N Sanes; K H Mauritz; E V Evarts; M C Dalakas; A Chu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Artifical vision for the blind: electrical stimulation of visual cortex offers hope for a functional prosthesis.

Authors:  W H Dobelle; M G Mladejovsky; J P Girvin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. I. Spatial errors.

Authors:  J Gordon; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection.

Authors:  Boubker Zaaimi; Ricardo Ruiz-Torres; Sara A Solla; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Neural Basis of Touch and Proprioception in Primate Cortex.

Authors:  Benoit P Delhaye; Katie H Long; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.090

2.  Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Sensory percepts induced by microwire array and DBS microstimulation in human sensory thalamus.

Authors:  Brandon D Swan; Lynne B Gasperson; Max O Krucoff; Warren M Grill; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Towards neural co-processors for the brain: combining decoding and encoding in brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Rajesh Pn Rao
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.

Authors:  Chethan Pandarinath; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Juliet Heye; Karthik Kumaravelu; Stefan M Goetz; Angel V Peterchev; Warren M Grill; Sliman Bensmaia; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Illusory movement perception improves motor control for prosthetic hands.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Jacqueline S Hebert; Jon W Sensinger; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Zachary C Thumser; Raviraj Nataraj; Dylan T Beckler; Michael R Dawson; Dan H Blustein; Satinder Gill; Brett D Mensh; Rafael Granja-Vazquez; Madeline D Newcomb; Jason P Carey; Beth M Orzell
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 17.956

8.  Sputtered ruthenium oxide coatings for neural stimulation and recording electrodes.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Jimin Maeng; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  A comprehensive model-based framework for optimal design of biomimetic patterns of electrical stimulation for prosthetic sensation.

Authors:  Karthik Kumaravelu; Tucker Tomlinson; Thierri Callier; Joseph Sombeck; Sliman J Bensmaia; Lee E Miller; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Charge injection characteristics of sputtered ruthenium oxide electrodes for neural stimulation and recording.

Authors:  Bitan Chakraborty; Alexandra Joshi-Imre; Stuart F Cogan
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.368

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.