Literature DB >> 23985904

Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory cortex increases probability of detection.

Boubker Zaaimi1, Ricardo Ruiz-Torres, Sara A Solla, Lee E Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) that decode control signals from motor cortex have developed tremendously in the past decade, but virtually all rely exclusively on vision to provide feedback. There is now increasing interest in developing an afferent interface to replace natural somatosensation, much as the cochlear implant has done for the sense of hearing. Preliminary experiments toward a somatosensory neuroprosthesis have mostly addressed the sense of touch, but proprioception, the sense of limb position and movement, is also critical for the control of movement. However, proprioceptive areas of cortex lack the precise somatotopy of tactile areas. We showed previously that there is only a weak tendency for neighboring neurons in area 2 to signal similar directions of hand movement. Consequently, stimulation with the relatively large currents used in many studies is likely to activate a rather heterogeneous set of neurons. APPROACH: Here, we have compared the effect of single-electrode stimulation at subthreshold levels to the effect of stimulating as many as seven electrodes in combination. MAIN
RESULTS: We found a mean enhancement in the sensitivity to the stimulus (d') of 0.17 for pairs compared to individual electrodes (an increase of roughly 30%), and an increase of 2.5 for groups of seven electrodes (260%). SIGNIFICANCE: We propose that a proprioceptive interface made up of several hundred electrodes may yield safer, more effective sensation than a BMI using fewer electrodes and larger currents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23985904      PMCID: PMC3821924          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  34 in total

1.  Sensing without touching: psychophysical performance based on cortical microstimulation.

Authors:  R Romo; A Hernández; A Zainos; C D Brody; L Lemus
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Microstimulation of V1 delays the execution of visually guided saccades.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Warren M Slocum; Peter H Schiller
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Chronic microstimulation of cat auditory cortex effective to evoke detection behaviors.

Authors:  J Wang; Y Liu; L Qin; S Chimoto; K Nakamoto; Y Sato
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  E J Tehovnik; A S Tolias; F Sultan; W M Slocum; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spread of stimulating current in the cortical grey matter of rat visual cortex studied on a new in vitro slice preparation.

Authors:  L G Nowak; J Bullier
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects of varying pulse amplitude and frequency.

Authors:  C M Murasugi; C D Salzman; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright; R Desimone; C G Gross
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Limb-state information encoded by peripheral and central somatosensory neurons: implications for an afferent interface.

Authors:  Douglas J Weber; Brian M London; James A Hokanson; Christopher A Ayers; Robert A Gaunt; Ricardo R Torres; Boubker Zaaimi; Lee E Miller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Victor Pikov; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Instant neural control of a movement signal.

Authors:  Mijail D Serruya; Nicholas G Hatsopoulos; Liam Paninski; Matthew R Fellows; John P Donoghue
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Sungshin Kim; Thierri Callier; Gregg A Tabot; Robert A Gaunt; Francesco V Tenore; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Somatosensory encoding with cuneate nucleus microstimulation: Detection of artificial stimuli.

Authors:  Srihari Y Sritharan; Andrew G Richardson; Pauline K Weigand; Ivette Planell-Mendez; Jan Van der Spiegel; Timothy H Lucas
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

4.  Widespread activation of awake mouse cortex by electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Maria C Dadarlat; Yujiao Sun; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Kristin M Quick; Jessica L Mischel; Patrick J Loughlin; Aaron P Batista
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface.

Authors:  Kevin H Chen; John F Dammann; Jessica L Boback; Francesco V Tenore; Kevin J Otto; Robert A Gaunt; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback.

Authors:  Joseph T Sombeck; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Sensory percepts induced by microwire array and DBS microstimulation in human sensory thalamus.

Authors:  Brandon D Swan; Lynne B Gasperson; Max O Krucoff; Warren M Grill; Dennis A Turner
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity.

Authors:  Tucker Tomlinson; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 10.  Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges.

Authors:  Sliman J Bensmaia; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.