Brandon D Swan1, Lynne B Gasperson2, Max O Krucoff2, Warren M Grill3, Dennis A Turner4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States. 4. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: dennis.turner@duke.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microstimulation in human sensory thalamus (ventrocaudal, VC) results in focal sensory percepts in the hand and arm which may provide an alternative target site (to somatosensory cortex) for the input of prosthetic sensory information. Sensory feedback to facilitate motor function may require simultaneous or timed responses across separate digits to recreate perceptions of slip as well as encoding of intensity variations in pressure or touch. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of evoking sensory percepts on separate digits with variable intensity through either a microwire array or deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode, recreating "natural" and scalable percepts relating to the arm and hand. METHODS: We compared microstimulation within ventrocaudal sensory thalamus through either a 16-channel microwire array (∼400 kΩ per channel) or a 4-channel DBS electrode (∼1.2 kΩ per contact) for percept location, size, intensity, and quality sensation, during thalamic DBS electrode placement in patients with essential tremor. RESULTS: Percepts in small hand or finger regions were evoked by microstimulation through individual microwires and in 5/6 patients sensation on different digits could be perceived from stimulation through separate microwires. Microstimulation through DBS electrode contacts evoked sensations over larger areas in 5/5 patients, and the apparent intensity of the perceived response could be modulated with stimulation amplitude. The perceived naturalness of the sensation depended both on the pattern of stimulation as well as intensity of the stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Producing consistent evoked perceptions across separate digits within sensory thalamus is a feasible concept and a compact alternative to somatosensory cortex microstimulation for prosthetic sensory feedback. This approach will require a multi-element low impedance electrode with a sufficient stimulation range to evoke variable intensities of perception and a predictable spread of contacts to engage separate digits.
BACKGROUND: Microstimulation in human sensory thalamus (ventrocaudal, VC) results in focal sensory percepts in the hand and arm which may provide an alternative target site (to somatosensory cortex) for the input of prosthetic sensory information. Sensory feedback to facilitate motor function may require simultaneous or timed responses across separate digits to recreate perceptions of slip as well as encoding of intensity variations in pressure or touch. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of evoking sensory percepts on separate digits with variable intensity through either a microwire array or deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode, recreating "natural" and scalable percepts relating to the arm and hand. METHODS: We compared microstimulation within ventrocaudal sensory thalamus through either a 16-channel microwire array (∼400 kΩ per channel) or a 4-channel DBS electrode (∼1.2 kΩ per contact) for percept location, size, intensity, and quality sensation, during thalamic DBS electrode placement in patients with essential tremor. RESULTS: Percepts in small hand or finger regions were evoked by microstimulation through individual microwires and in 5/6 patients sensation on different digits could be perceived from stimulation through separate microwires. Microstimulation through DBS electrode contacts evoked sensations over larger areas in 5/5 patients, and the apparent intensity of the perceived response could be modulated with stimulation amplitude. The perceived naturalness of the sensation depended both on the pattern of stimulation as well as intensity of the stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Producing consistent evoked perceptions across separate digits within sensory thalamus is a feasible concept and a compact alternative to somatosensory cortex microstimulation for prosthetic sensory feedback. This approach will require a multi-element low impedance electrode with a sufficient stimulation range to evoke variable intensities of perception and a predictable spread of contacts to engage separate digits.
Authors: Sharlene N Flesher; Jennifer L Collinger; Stephen T Foldes; Jeffrey M Weiss; John E Downey; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Sliman J Bensmaia; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Robert A Gaunt Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Hai Sun; Timothy M Blakely; Felix Darvas; Jeremiah D Wander; Lise A Johnson; David K Su; Kai J Miller; Eberhard E Fetz; Jeffery G Ojemann Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Anne-Christine Schmid; Jui-Hong Chien; Joel D Greenspan; Ira Garonzik; Nirit Weiss; Shinji Ohara; Frederick Arthur Lenz Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Mayela Zamora; Robert Toth; Francesca Morgante; Jon Ottaway; Tom Gillbe; Sean Martin; Guy Lamb; Tara Noone; Moaad Benjaber; Zachary Nairac; Devang Sehgal; Timothy G Constandinou; Jeffrey Herron; Tipu Z Aziz; Ivor Gillbe; Alexander L Green; Erlick A C Pereira; Timothy Denison Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 5.620
Authors: Amol P Yadav; Shuangyan Li; Max O Krucoff; Mikhail A Lebedev; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr; Miguel A L Nicolelis Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 9.184
Authors: Christopher L Hughes; Sharlene N Flesher; Jeffrey M Weiss; Michael Boninger; Jennifer L Collinger; Robert A Gaunt Journal: Elife Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 8.713