Literature DB >> 35378515

Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array.

Joseph T Sombeck1, Juliet Heye2, Karthik Kumaravelu3, Stefan M Goetz4,5,6,7,8, Angel V Peterchev3,4,5,6,7, Warren M Grill3,4,9,5,7, Sliman Bensmaia10,11,12, Lee E Miller1,2,13,14.   

Abstract

Objective.Persons with tetraplegia can use brain-machine interfaces to make visually guided reaches with robotic arms. Without somatosensory feedback, these movements will likely be slow and imprecise, like those of persons who retain movement but have lost proprioception. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) has promise for providing artificial somatosensory feedback. ICMS that mimics naturally occurring neural activity, may allow afferent interfaces that are more informative and easier to learn than stimulation evoking unnaturalistic activity. To develop such biomimetic stimulation patterns, it is important to characterize the responses of neurons to ICMS.Approach.Using a Utah multi-electrode array, we recorded activity evoked by both single pulses and trains of ICMS at a wide range of amplitudes and frequencies in two rhesus macaques. As the electrical artifact caused by ICMS typically prevents recording for many milliseconds, we deployed a custom rapid-recovery amplifier with nonlinear gain to limit signal saturation on the stimulated electrode. Across all electrodes after stimulation, we removed the remaining slow return to baseline with acausal high-pass filtering of time-reversed recordings.Main results.After single pulses of stimulation, we recorded what was likely transsynaptically-evoked activity even on the stimulated electrode as early as ∼0.7 ms. This was immediately followed by suppressed neural activity lasting 10-150 ms. After trains, this long-lasting inhibition was replaced by increased firing rates for ∼100 ms. During long trains, the evoked response on the stimulated electrode decayed rapidly while the response was maintained on non-stimulated channels.Significance.The detailed description of the spatial and temporal response to ICMS can be used to better interpret results from experiments that probe circuit connectivity or function of cortical areas. These results can also contribute to the design of stimulation patterns to improve afferent interfaces for artificial sensory feedback. Creative Commons Attribution license.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain computer interface; intracortical microstimulation; monkey; somatosensory

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35378515      PMCID: PMC9142773          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac63e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.043


  68 in total

1.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications.

Authors:  A Hyvärinen; E Oja
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2000 May-Jun

2.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Takao Hashimoto; Christopher M Elder; Jerrold L Vitek
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Methods for isolating extracellular action potentials and removing stimulus artifacts from microelectrode recordings of neurons requiring minimal operator intervention.

Authors:  Erwin B Montgomery; John T Gale; He Huang
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 4.  Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  E J Tehovnik; A S Tolias; F Sultan; W M Slocum; N K Logothetis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity.

Authors:  Tucker Tomlinson; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Psychophysical correspondence between vibrotactile intensity and intracortical microstimulation for tactile neuroprostheses in rats.

Authors:  İsmail Devecioğlu; Burak Güçlü
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Effects of stimulus pulse rate on somatosensory adaptation in the human cortex.

Authors:  Christopher L Hughes; Sharlene N Flesher; Robert A Gaunt
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 9.184

8.  Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Vincent Bonin; R Clay Reid
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Doherty; Mikhail A Lebedev; Peter J Ifft; Katie Z Zhuang; Solaiman Shokur; Hannes Bleuler; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges.

Authors:  Sliman J Bensmaia; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.