Literature DB >> 34686909

The effect of cathodal transspinal direct current stimulation on tibialis anterior stretch reflex components in humans.

Eva Rudjord Therkildsen1, Jens Bo Nielsen2,3, Mikkel Malling Beck4, Tomofumi Yamaguchi2,5, Jakob Lorentzen2.   

Abstract

Spinal DC stimulation (tsDCS) shows promise as a technique for the facilitation of functional recovery of motor function following central nervous system (CNS) lesion. However, the network mechanisms that are responsible for the effects of tsDCS are still uncertain. Here, in a series of experiments, we tested the hypothesis that tsDCS increases the excitability of the long-latency stretch reflex, leading to increased excitability of corticospinal neurons in the primary motor cortex. Experiments were performed in 33 adult human subjects (mean age 28 ± 7 years/14 females). Subjects were seated in a reclining armchair with the right leg attached to a footplate, which could be quickly plantarflexed (100 deg/s; 6 deg amplitude) to induce stretch reflexes in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle at short (45 ms) and longer latencies (90-95 ms). This setup also enabled measuring motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary evoked potentials (cMEPs) from TA evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electrical stimulation at the cervical junction, respectively. Cathodal tsDCS at 2.5 and 4 mA was found to increase the long-latency reflex without any significant effect on the short-latency reflex. Furthermore, TA MEPs, but not cMEPs, were increased following tsDCS. We conclude that cathodal tsDCS over lumbar segments may facilitate proprioceptive transcortical reflexes in the TA muscle, and we suggest that the most likely explanation of this facilitation is an effect on ascending fibers in the dorsal columns.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Motor control; Plasticity; Transcortical reflex; Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation; tsDCS

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34686909     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06243-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings.

Authors:  Filippo Cogiamanian; Maurizio Vergari; Elena Schiaffi; Sara Marceglia; Gianluca Ardolino; Sergio Barbieri; Alberto Priori
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats.

Authors:  J Aguilar; F Pulecchi; R Dilena; A Oliviero; A Priori; G Foffani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation modulates human corticospinal system excitability.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Sara Marceglia; Maurizio Vergari; Valeria Cognetto; Filippo Cogiamanian; Ferdinando Sartucci; Alberto Priori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Does trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulate the Hoffmann reflexes of healthy individuals? A systematic review and meta-analysisc.

Authors:  Plínio Luna Albuquerque; Thyciane Mendonça; Mayara Campêlo; Lívia Shirahige; Kátia Monte-Silva
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Long-term effects of direct current are reproduced by intermittent depolarization of myelinated nerve fibers.

Authors:  M Bączyk; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cathodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) improves motor unit recruitment in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Beatrice Vannini; Antonio Torzini; Andrea Mazzatenta; Maurizio Vergari; Filippo Cogiamanian; Alberto Priori; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Evidence for transcortical reflex pathways in the lower limb of man.

Authors:  L O Christensen; N Petersen; J B Andersen; T Sinkjaer; J B Nielsen
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  An unexpected target of spinal direct current stimulation: Interhemispheric connectivity in humans.

Authors:  Tommaso Bocci; Matteo Caleo; Beatrice Vannini; Maurizio Vergari; Filippo Cogiamanian; Simone Rossi; Alberto Priori; Ferdinando Sartucci
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Josef Ladenbauer; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.094

10.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation induces lasting fatigue resistance and enhances explosive vertical jump performance.

Authors:  Helen R Berry; Rothwelle J Tate; Bernard A Conway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) does not affect postural sway of young and healthy subjects during quiet upright standing.

Authors:  Felipe Fava de Lima; Cristiano Rocha Silva; Andre Fabio Kohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.