| Literature DB >> 27930685 |
Daniela Farah1,2, Jonas Nunes1, Michelle Sartori2,3, Danielle da Silva Dias3, Raquel Sirvente2, Maikon B Silva2, Patrícia Fiorino1, Mariana Morris4, Susana Llesuy5, Vera Farah1, Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen2, Kátia De Angelis3.
Abstract
The risks of chronic diseases associated with the increasing consumption of fructose-laden foods are amplified by the lack of regular physical activity and have become a serious public health issue worldwide. Moreover, childhood eating habits are strongly related to metabolic syndrome in adults. Thus, we aimed to investigate the preventive role of exercise training undertaken concurrently with a high fructose diet on cardiac function, hemodynamics, cardiovascular autonomic modulation and oxidative stress in male rats after weaning. Male Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups (n = 8/group): Sedentary control (SC), Trained control (TC), Sedentary Fructose (SF) and Trained Fructose (TF). Training was performed on a treadmill (8 weeks, 40-60% of maximum exercise test). Evaluations of cardiac function, hemodynamics, cardiovascular autonomic modulation and oxidative stress in plasma and in left ventricle (LV) were performed. Chronic fructose overload induced glucose intolerance and an increase in white adipose tissue (WAT) weight, in myocardial performance index (MPI) (SF:0.42±0.04 vs. SC:0.24±0.05) and in arterial pressure (SF:122±3 vs. SC:113±1 mmHg) associated with increased cardiac and vascular sympathetic modulation. Fructose also induced unfavorable changes in oxidative stress profile (plasmatic protein oxidation- SF:3.30±0.09 vs. SC:1.45±0.08 nmol/mg prot; and LV total antioxidant capacity (TRAP)- SF: 2.5±0.5 vs. SC:12.7±1.7 uM trolox). The TF group showed reduced WAT, glucose intolerance, MPI (0.35±0.04), arterial pressure (118±2mmHg), sympathetic modulation, plasmatic protein oxidation and increased TRAP when compared to SF group. Therefore, our findings indicate that cardiometabolic dysfunctions induced by fructose overload early in life may be prevented by moderate aerobic exercise training.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27930685 PMCID: PMC5145255 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Abdominal fat tissue and glucose intolerance (AUC) in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) rats.
* p<0.05 vs SC; # p<0.05 vs TC; † p<0.05 vs SF.
Echocardiographic evaluations in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) groups.
| SC | TC | SF | TF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.62 ± 0.12 | 3.74 ± 0.13 | 3.59 ± 0.08 | 3.42 ± 0.06 | |
| 2.10 ± 0.13 | 2.02 ± 0.07 | 2.26 ± 0.07 | 2.01 ± 0.06 | |
| 0.45 ± 0.033 | 0.50 ± 0.014 | 0.44 ± 0.037 | 0.51 ± 0.038 | |
| 81 ± 2.2 | 84 ± 1.0 | 77 ± 1.8 | 84 ± 2.3 | |
| 47 ± 2 | 48 ± 1 | 41 ± 2 | 48 ± 3 | |
| 23.3 ± 1.7 | 23.4 ± 0.7 | 25.2 ± 2.0 | 24.7 ±1.0 | |
| 1.63 ± 0.07 | 1.71 ± 0.18 | 1.63 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.10 | |
| 39.3 ± 1.4 | 40.17 ± 0.8 | 38.0 ± 2.9 | 39.2 ± 1.3 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. LVM corr = left ventricular mass corrected by body weight; LVd /corr = left ventricle cavity in diastole correct by weight; RWT = relative wall thickness; LVEF = left ventricle ejection fraction; LVFS = left ventricle fractional shortening; E/A = relation of maximal early diastolic peak velocity and late peak velocity; Desac. E = desaceleration of early diastolic peak velocity; IVRT = isovolumetric relaxation time.
* p<0.05 vs SC
# p<0.05 vs TC
† p<0.05 vs SF
Fig 2Cardiac global function was evaluated by the myocardial performance index (MPI) in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) rats.
* p<0.05 vs SC.
Hemodynamic and autonomic modulation in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) groups.
| SC | TC | SF | TF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138 ± 2 | 135 ± 4 | 146 ± 3 | 140 ± 2 | |
| 95 ± 2 | 99 ± 2 | 106 ± 3 | 103 ± 2 | |
| 113 ± 1 | 115 ± 3 | 122 ± 3 | 118 ± 2 | |
| 366 ± 13.4 | 339 ± 5.8 | 378 ± 8.3 | 340 ± 6.7 | |
| 6.27 ± 0.78 | 6.66 ± 0.85 | 7.23 ± 0.59 | 7.32 ± 0.53 | |
| 33.8 ± 4.60 | 43.0 ± 8.20 | 50.3 ± 7.51 | 60.5 ± 5.81 | |
| 1.32 ± 0.35 | 1.77 ± 0.45 | 3.97 ± 0.76 | 2.03 ± 0.17 | |
| 6.32 ± 1.48 | 9.52 ± 2.12 | 7.71 ± 1.24 | 6.82 ± 0.84 | |
| 21.65 ± 3.54 | 23.34 ± 0.93 | 33.29 ± 2.89 | 25.32 ± 2.03 | |
| 78.35 ± 3.54 | 76.66 ± 0.93 | 66.71 ± 2.89 | 74.68 ± 2.03 | |
| 4.77 ± 0.20 | 4.80 ± 0.35 | 6.16 ± 0.40 | 4.65 ± 0.18 | |
| 25.42 ± 2.77 | 23.05 ± 3.76 | 41.75 ± 4.88 | 23.58 ± 2.19 | |
| 6.94 ± 0.82 | 3.72 ± 0.28 | 11.91 ± 1.08 | 4.80 ± 0.38 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM. MAP = mean arterial pressure; SAP = systolic arterial pressure; DAP = diastolic arterial pressure; HR = heart rate; PIV = pulse interval variability; SD = standard deviation; VAR = variability; LF = low frequency band; HF = high frequency band; %LF = normalized low frequency band; %HF = normalized high frequency band; SAPV = systolic arterial pressure variability.
* p<0.05 vs SC
# p<0.05 vs TC
† p<0.05 vs SF
Fig 3Sympathovagal balance (LF/HF) in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) groups.
* p<0.05 vs SC; # p<0.05 vs TC; † p<0.05 vs SF.
Oxidative stress assessment in left ventricle (LV) and plasma in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) groups.
| SC | TC | SF | TF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBARS (μmol/mg protein) | 5.36 ± 0.40 | 4.85 ± 0.82 | 4.33 ± 0.35 | 2.95 ± 0.20 |
| CL (cps/mg protein) | 5846 ± 215 | 5795 ± 186 | 6800 ± 296 | 5255 ± 212 |
| Protein Oxidation (nmol/mg protein) | 4.71 ± 0.51 | 3.85 ± 0.45 | 3.22 ± 0.34 | 2.89 ± 0.37 |
| CAT (nmol/mg protein) | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.42 ± 0.03 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.03 |
| SOD (USOD/mg protein) | 14.91 ± 0.54 | 14.26 ± 0.88 | 11.98 ± 0.75 | 12.61 ± 0.94 |
| GPx (μmol/min/mg protein) | 0.029 ± 0.001 | 0.035 ± 0.008 | 0.029 ± 0.002 | 0.035 ± 0.001 |
| GSH/GSSG | 11.95 ± 0.52 | 11.25 ± 0.66 | 12.94 ± 0.53 | 16.17 ± 0.33 |
| TBARS (μmol/mg protein) | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.19 ± 0.02 |
| Protein Oxidation (nmol/mg protein) | 1.45 ± 0.08 | 1.49 ± 0.11 | 3.30 ± 0.09 | 2.75 ± 0.18 |
| SOD (USOD/mg protein) | 1.00 ± 0.03 | 0.98 ± 0.05 | 0.95 ± 0.03 | 0.91 ± 0.04 |
Data are reported as mean ± SEM. Antioxidant enzymes: SOD = Superoxide dismutase; GPx = Glutathione peroxidase; CAT = Catalase.
* p<0.05 vs SC
# p<0.05 vs TC
† p<0.05 vs SF
Fig 4Total antioxidant capacity (TRAP) on left ventricle (LV) and plasma in sedentary control (SC), trained control (TC), sedentary fructose (SF) and trained fructose (TF) groups.
* p<0.05 vs SC; # p<0.05 vs TC; † p<0.05 vs SF.