| Literature DB >> 22892928 |
Cristiano Mostarda1, Ivana Cinthya Moraes-Silva, Vera Maria Cury Salemi, Jacqueline Freire Machi, Bruno Rodrigues, Kátia De Angelis, Vera de Moura Azevedo Farah, Maria Claudia Irigoyen.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High fructose consumption contributes to the incidence of metabolic syndrome and, consequently, to cardiovascular outcomes. We investigated whether exercise training prevents high fructose diet-induced metabolic and cardiac morphofunctional alterations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22892928 PMCID: PMC3400174 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2012(07)18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Lee Index, systolic arterial pressure, the rate constant for blood glucose disappearance and area under the curve in control (C) high fructose-fed (F) and trained high fructose-fed (FT) groups. One-way ANOVA, *p<0.05 vs. C and # p<0.05 vs. C and FT.
Table 1 - Cardiac morphometric and functional evaluations by echocardiography in control (C), fructose-fed (F) and trained fructose-fed (FT) groups.
| Variable | C (7) | F (7) | FT (7) |
| 0.73±0.03 | 1.3±0.01* | 1.2±0.01* | |
| 0.33±0.007 | 0.38±0.005* | 0.35±0.004 | |
| 40±1.5 | 36±1 | 40±1.6 | |
| 77±1.6 | 72±1.1 | 76±1.5 | |
| 0.0053±0.0003 | 0.0046±0.0001 | 0.0052±0.0002 | |
| 22±0.4 | 27±0.9# | 0.22±0.6 | |
| 1.6±0.03 | 2.05±0.07# | 1.73±0.03 | |
| 1.72±0.08 | 2.24±0.12# | 1.72±0.15 | |
| 0.32±0.02 | 0.41±0.02# | 0.33±0.01 |
Values are the mean ± SEM. The morphometric evaluation consisted of the assessment of left ventricular mass (LV mass) and relative wall thickness (RWT). Systolic function was evaluated by the left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and velocity of circumferential fiber shortening (VCF). Diastolic function was evaluated by the absolute and normalized LV isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT and nIVRT, respectively) and the ratio of the maximal early diastolic peak velocity (E) and late peak velocity (A) of mitral flow (E/A ratio). Cardiac global function was evaluated by the myocardial performance index (MPI). * p<0.05 vs. C and # p<0.05 vs. C and FT (one-way ANOVA).
Figure 2Correlation analyses between insulin resistance index, diastolic index and global index. A: normalized isovolumetric relaxation time (nIVRT), B: ratio of maximal early diastolic peak velocity (E) and late peak velocity (A) of mitral flow (E/A ratio), C: myocardial performance index (MPI) vs. area under the curve of the rate constant for blood glucose disappearance (AUC) and D: nIVRT, E: E/A ratio and F: MPI vs. the rate constant for blood glucose disappearance (KITT), involving control, fructose-fed and trained fructose-fed rats.