Literature DB >> 27873185

Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.

Michael A Eskenazi1, Jocelyn R Folk2.   

Abstract

The direction and duration of eye movements during reading is predominantly determined by cognitive and linguistic processing, but some low-level oculomotor effects also influence the duration and direction of eye movements. One such effect is inhibition of return (IOR), which results in an increased latency to return attention to a target that has been previously attended (Posner & Cohen, Attention and Performance X: Control of Language Processes, 32, 531-556, 1984). Although this is a low level effect, it has also been found in the complex task of reading (Henderson & Luke, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(6), 1101-1107, 2012; Rayner, Juhasz, Ashby, & Clifton, Vision Research, 43(9), 1027-1034, 2003). The purpose of the current study was to isolate the potentially different causes of regressive eye movements: to adjust for oculomotor error and to assist with comprehension difficulties. We found that readers demonstrated an IOR effect when regressions were caused by oculomotor error, but not when regressions were caused by comprehension difficulties. The results suggest that IOR is primarily associated with low-level oculomotor control of eye movements, and that regressive eye movements that are controlled by comprehension processes are not subject to IOR effects. The results have implications for understanding the relationship between oculomotor and cognitive control of eye movements and for models of eye movement control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye movements; Reading; Regressions; Word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27873185     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1200-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics.

Authors:  Colin J Davis
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-02

3.  Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  D Titone
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

6.  Don't believe what you read (only once): comprehension is supported by regressions during reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Randy Tran; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-04-18

7.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

8.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-13

10.  Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-04
View more
  2 in total

1.  Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Folk; Michael A Eskenazi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Return sweeps in reading: Processing implications of undersweep-fixations.

Authors:  Timothy J Slattery; Adam J Parker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.