Literature DB >> 9843609

Hemispheric differences in context sensitivity during lexical ambiguity resolution.

D Titone1.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the influence of contextual constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution in the cerebral hemispheres. A cross-modal priming variant of the divided visual field task was utilized in which subjects heard sentences containing homonyms and made lexical decisions to targets semantically related to dominant and subordinate meanings. Experiment 1 showed priming in both hemispheres of dominant meanings for homonyms embedded in neutral sentence contexts. Experiment 2 showed priming in both hemispheres of dominant and subordinate meanings for homonyms embedded in sentence contexts that biased a central semantic feature of the subordinate meaning. Experiment 3 showed priming of dominant meanings in the left hemisphere (LH), and priming of the subordinate meaning in the right hemisphere (RH) for homonyms embedded in sentences that biased a peripheral semantic feature of the subordinate meaning. These results are consistent with a context-sensitive model of language processing that incorporates differential sensitivity to semantic relationships in the cerebral hemispheres. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9843609     DOI: 10.1006/brln.1998.1998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  18 in total

1.  ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension.

Authors:  Victoria A Kazmerski; Dawn G Blasko; Banchiamlack G Dessalegn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

2.  Both sides get the point: hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint.

Authors:  Kara D Federmeier; Heinke Mai; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-07

3.  Multiple priming of lexically ambiguous and unambiguous targets in the cerebral hemispheres: the coarse coding hypothesis revisited.

Authors:  Padmapriya Kandhadai; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

5.  Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Folk; Michael A Eskenazi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Do nonnative language speakers chew the fat and spill the beans with different brain hemispheres? Investigating idiom decomposability with the divided visual field paradigm.

Authors:  Anna B Cieślicka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2013-12

7.  Contextual Constraint Treatment for coarse coding deficit in adults with right hemisphere brain damage: generalisation to narrative discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Margaret Lehman Blake; Connie A Tompkins; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh; Julie Wambaugh
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension.

Authors:  M J Beeman; E M Bowden; M A Gernsbacher
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Wiltrud Fassbinder; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

10.  Examining lateralized semantic access using pictures.

Authors:  Kyle Lovseth; Ruth Ann Atchley
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.