Literature DB >> 24972648

Skipped words and fixated words are processed differently during reading.

Michael A Eskenazi1, Jocelyn R Folk.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether words are processed differently when they are fixated during silent reading than when they are skipped. According to a serial processing model of eye movement control (e.g., EZ Reader) skipped words are fully processed (Reichle, Rayner, Pollatsek, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(04):445-476, 2003), whereas in a parallel processing model (e.g., SWIFT) skipped words do not need to be fully processed (Engbert, Nuthmann, Richter, Kliegl, Psychological Review, 112(4):777-813, 2005). Participants read 34 sentences with target words embedded in them while their eye movements were recorded. All target words were three-letter, low-frequency, and unpredictable nouns. After the reading session, participants completed a repetition priming lexical decision task with the target words from the reading session included as the repetition prime targets, with presentation of those same words during the reading task acting as the prime. When participants skipped a word during the reading session, their reaction times on the lexical decision task were significantly longer (M = 656.42 ms) than when they fixated the word (M = 614.43 ms). This result provides evidence that skipped words are sometimes not processed to the same degree as fixated words during reading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 24972648     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0682-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  10 in total

1.  Eye movement control in reading: word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words.

Authors:  K Rayner; K S Binder; J Ashby; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  Tests of the E-Z Reader model: exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Do readers obtain preview benefit from word N + 2? A test of serial attention shift versus distributed lexical processing models of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara J Juhasz; Sarah J Brown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Additive and interactive effects in semantic priming: Isolating lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota; Sarah E Tan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 8.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: implications for attention and eye movement control.

Authors:  J M Henderson; F Ferreira
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Coordination of word recognition and oculomotor control during reading: the role of implicit lexical decisions.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.332

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Folk; Michael A Eskenazi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  On forward inferences of fast and slow readers. An eye movement study.

Authors:  Stefan Hawelka; Sarah Schuster; Benjamin Gagl; Florian Hutzler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.