Literature DB >> 23055138

Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

John M Henderson1, Steven G Luke.   

Abstract

Oculomotor inhibition of return (O-IOR) is an increase in saccade latency prior to an eye movement to a recently fixated location, as compared with other locations. To investigate O-IOR in reading, subjects participated in two conditions while their eye movements were recorded: normal reading and mindless reading with words replaced by geometric shapes. We investigated the manifestation of O-IOR in reading and whether it is related to extracting meaning from the text or is an oculomotor phenomenon. The results indicated that fixation durations prior to a saccade returning to the immediately preceding fixated word were longer than those to other words, consistent with O-IOR. Furthermore, fixation durations were longest prior to a saccade that returned the eyes to the specific character position in the word that had previously been fixated and dropped off as the distance between the previously fixated character and landing position increased. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that O-IOR is relatively precise in its application during reading and drops off as a gradient. Both of these results were found for text reading and for mindless reading, suggesting that they are consequences of oculomotor control, and not of language processing. Finally, although these temporal IOR effects were robust, no spatial consequences of IOR were observed: Previously fixated words and characters were as likely to be refixated as new words and characters.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23055138     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0274-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Attention and eye movements in reading: inhibition of return predicts the size of regressive saccades.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

4.  The IOVP effect in mindless reading: experiment and modeling.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Mindless reading revisited: an analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Searching for inhibition of return in visual search: a review.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search?

Authors:  Tim J Smith; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Mindless reading: eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts.

Authors:  F Vitu; J K O'Regan; A W Inhoff; R Topolski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-04

10.  Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-02-13
View more
  10 in total

1.  Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

2.  Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Folk; Michael A Eskenazi
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Cortical control of eye movements in natural reading: Evidence from MVPA.

Authors:  Jessica E Goold; Wonil Choi; John M Henderson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07

5.  Co-registration of eye movements and event-related potentials in connected-text paragraph reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke; Joseph Schmidt; John E Richards
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-10

6.  The neural substrates of natural reading: a comparison of normal and nonword text using eyetracking and fMRI.

Authors:  Wonil Choi; Rutvik H Desai; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Multisensory integration attenuates visually induced oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tang; Mengying Yuan; Zhongyu Shi; Min Gao; Rongxia Ren; Ming Wei; Yulin Gao
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Joseph Schmidt; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-02

9.  Predicting cognitive state from eye movements.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Jing Wang; Steven G Luke; Jenn Olejarczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Influence of Content Meaningfulness on Eye Movements across Tasks: Evidence from Scene Viewing and Reading.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.