Literature DB >> 19222812

Novelty is not always the best policy: inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task.

Michael D Dodd1, Stefan Van der Stigchel, Andrew Hollingworth.   

Abstract

We report a study that examined whether inhibition of return (IOR) is specific to visual search or a general characteristic of visual behavior. Participants were shown a series of scenes and were asked to (a) search each scene for a target, (b) memorize each scene, (c) rate how pleasant each scene was, or (d) view each scene freely. An examination of saccadic reaction times to probes provided evidence of IOR during search: Participants were slower to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations. For the other three conditions, however, the opposite pattern of results was observed: Participants were faster to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations, a facilitation-of-return effect that has not been reported previously. These results demonstrate that IOR is a search-specific strategy and not a general characteristic of visual attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19222812     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  25 in total

1.  Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Jason Satel; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Spatial orienting of attention simultaneously cued by automatic social and nonsocial cues.

Authors:  Deanna J Greene; Eran Zaidel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A Generative Model of Cognitive State from Task and Eye Movements.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Amelia R Hunt; Alasdair D F Clarke; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.418

Review 4.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

5.  Regressions during reading: The cost depends on the cause.

Authors:  Michael A Eskenazi; Jocelyn R Folk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

6.  Oculomotor inhibition of return in normal and mindless reading.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Steven G Luke
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Maintaining rejected distractors in working memory during visual search depends on search stimuli: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.

Authors:  Lauren H Williams; Trafton Drew
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Cerebral hemodynamics during scene viewing: Hemispheric lateralization predicts temporal gaze behavior associated with distinct modes of visual processing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Mohammed Alwatban; Benjamin Hage; Erin Barney; Edward J Truemper; Gregory R Bashford; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Human classifier: Observers can deduce task solely from eye movements.

Authors:  Brett Bahle; Mark Mills; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  How does implicit learning of search regularities alter the manner in which you search?

Authors:  Gerald P McDonnell; Mark Mills; Leslie McCuller; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.