Literature DB >> 27839928

Monitoring Daily QA 3 constancy for routine quality assurance on linear accelerators.

Diana Binny1, Craig M Lancaster2, Tanya Kairn3, Jamie V Trapp4, Scott B Crowe5.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Daily QA 3 (Sun Nuclear Corporation, Melbourne, USA) device as a safe quality assurance device for control of machine specific parameters, such as linear accelerator output, beam quality and beam flatness and symmetry. Measurements were performed using three Varian 2300iX linear accelerators. The suitability of Daily QA 3 as a device for quality control of linear accelerator parameters was investigated for both 6 and 10MV photons and 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18MeV electrons. Measurements of machine specific using the Daily QA 3 device were compared to corresponding measurements using a simpler constancy meter, Farmer chamber and plane parallel ionisation chamber in a water tank. The Daily QA 3 device showed a linear dose response making it a suitable device for detection of output variations during routine measurements. It was noted that over estimations of variations compared with Farmer chamber readings were seen if the Daily QA 3 wasn't calibrated for output and sensitivity on a regular eight to ten monthly basis. Temperature-pressure correction factors calculated by Daily QA 3 also contributed towards larger short term variations seen in output measurements. Energy, symmetry and flatness variations detected by Daily QA 3 were consistent with measurements performed in water tank using a parallel plate chamber. It was concluded that the Daily QA 3 device is suitable for routine daily and fortnightly quality assurance of linear accelerator beam parameters however a regular eight-ten monthly dose and detector array calibration will improve error detection capabilities of the device. Crown Copyright Â
© 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Constancy; Daily QA 3; Ionisation chamber; Linear accelerator; Quality assurance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27839928     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med        ISSN: 1120-1797            Impact factor:   2.685


  8 in total

1.  Study on the established customized limits for the daily quality assurance procedure.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Jin; Jian-Bo Song; Jin-Xin Peng; Xiao-Peng Pan; Rui Guo; Xiao-Fen Xing
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Retrospective study on performance of constancy check device in Linac beam monitoring using Statistical Process Control.

Authors:  Bipasha Pal; Angshuman Pal; Suresh Das; Soura Palit; Papai Sarkar; Subhayan Mondal; Suman Mallik; Jyotirup Goswami; Sayan Das; Arijit Sen; Monidipa Mondol
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-10

3.  A comparison of symmetry and flatness measurements in small electron fields by different dosimeters in electron beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Mohamad Reza Bayatiani; Fatemeh Fallahi; Akbar Aliasgharzadeh; Mahdi Ghorbani; Benyamin Khajetash; Fatemeh Seif
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-02-25

4.  Statistical process control and verifying positional accuracy of a cobra motion couch using step-wedge quality assurance tool.

Authors:  Diana Binny; Craig M Lancaster; Jamie V Trapp; Scott B Crowe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Monitoring beam-quality constancy considering uncertainties associated with ionization chambers in Daily QA3 device.

Authors:  Su Chul Han; Jihun Kim; Min Cheol Han; Kyung Hwan Chang; Kwangwoo Park; Ho Jin Kim; Dong Wook Kim; Jin Sung Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The lifetime of a linac monitor unit ion chamber.

Authors:  Ashley J Cetnar; Dominic J DiCostanzo
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Determination of machine-specific tolerances using statistical process control analysis of long-term uniform scanning proton machine QA results.

Authors:  Suresh Rana; Colton Eckert; Hardev Singh; Yuanshui Zheng; Michael Chacko; Mark Storey; John Chang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Long-term experience of MPC across multiple TrueBeam linacs: MPC concordance with conventional QC and sensitivity to real-world faults.

Authors:  Michael Pearson; David Eaton; Tony Greener
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.