Literature DB >> 33596210

Monitoring beam-quality constancy considering uncertainties associated with ionization chambers in Daily QA3 device.

Su Chul Han1, Jihun Kim1, Min Cheol Han1, Kyung Hwan Chang2, Kwangwoo Park1, Ho Jin Kim1, Dong Wook Kim1, Jin Sung Kim1.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the changes occurring in the X-ray energy of a linear accelerator (LINAC) using a Daily QA3 detector system. This is accomplished by comparing the Daily QA3 results against those obtained using a water phantom. The X-energy levels of a LINAC were monitored over a duration of 1 month using the Daily QA3 system. Moreover, to account for the uncertainty, the reproducibility of the Daily QA3 ionization-chamber results was assessed by performing repeated measurements (12 per day). Subsequently, the energy-monitoring results were compared with the energy-change results calculated using the water-phantom percentage depth dose (PDD) ratio. As observed, the 6- and 10-MV beams experienced average daily energy-level changes of (-0.30 ± 0.32)% and (0.05 ± 0.38)%, respectively, during repeated measurements. The corresponding energy changes equaled (-0.30 ± 0.55)% and (-0.05 ± 0.48)%, respectively, when considering the measurement uncertainty. The Daily QA3 measurements performed at 6 MV demonstrated a variation of (2.15 ± 0.81)% (i.e., up to 3%). Meanwhile, the corresponding measurements performed using a water phantom demonstrated an increase in the PDD ratio from 0.577 to 0.580 (i.e., approximately 0.5%). At 10 MV, the energy variation in the Daily QA3 measurements equaled (-0.41 ± 0.82)% (i.e., within 1.5%), whereas the corresponding water phantom PDD ratio remained constant at 0.626. These results reveal that the Daily QA3 system can be used to monitor small energy changes occurring within radiotherapy machines. This demonstrates its potential for use as a secondary system for monitoring energy changes as part of the daily quality-assurance workflow.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33596210      PMCID: PMC7888663          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  17 in total

1.  On the beam quality specification of high-energy photons for radiotherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  P Andreo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Monitoring linear accelerator output constancy using the PTW Linacheck.

Authors:  Garry M McDermott; Andrew H Buckle
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 1.482

3.  Measuring linac photon beam energy through EPID image analysis of physically wedged fields.

Authors:  S M Dawoud; S J Weston; I Bond; G C Ward; P A Rixham; J Mason; A Huckle; J R Sykes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  PTW QUICKCHECKwebline: Daily quality assurance phantom comparison and overall performance.

Authors:  Daniel Nicewonger; Pamela Myers Daniel Saenz Neil Kirby Karl Rasmussen Niko Papanikolaou Sotiri Stathakis
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: report of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 40.

Authors:  G J Kutcher; L Coia; M Gillin; W F Hanson; S Leibel; R J Morton; J R Palta; J A Purdy; L E Reinstein; G K Svensson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quality assurance of electron and photon beam energy using the BQ-CHECK phantom.

Authors:  Richard J Speight; Ashraf Esmail; Steve J Weston
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.a.: Linear accelerator performance tests.

Authors:  Koren Smith; Peter Balter; John Duhon; Gerald A White; David L Vassy; Robin A Miller; Christopher F Serago; Lynne A Fairobent
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Monitoring linear accelerators electron beam energy constancy with a 2D ionization chamber array and double-wedge phantom.

Authors:  Song Gao; Mikhail A Chetvertkov; William E Simon; Amir Sadeghi; Peter A Balter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Daily QA in proton therapy using a single commercially available detector.

Authors:  Jamil Lambert; Christian Bäumer; Benjamin Koska; Xiaoning Ding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  A novel daily QA system for proton therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoning Ding; Yuanshui Zheng; Omar Zeidan; Anthony Mascia; Wen Hsi; Yixiu Kang; Eric Ramirez; Niek Schreuder; Ben Harris
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.