Shristi Rawal1, Howard J Hoffman2, Mallory Honda1, Tania B Huedo-Medin1, Valerie B Duffy1. 1. Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, 358 Mansfield Road, Unit 1101, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. 2. Epidemiology and Statistics Program, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The US NHANES 2011-2014 protocol includes a taste and smell questionnaire (CSQ) in home-based interviews and brief assessments in mobile exam centers. We report the short- and longer-term test-retest reliability and validity of this protocol against broader chemosensory measures. METHODS: A convenience sample of 73 adults (age=39.5±20.8 years) underwent the NHANES protocol at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months. For taste, participants rated intensities of two tastants (1 M NaCl, 1 mM quinine) applied to the tongue tip and three tastants (1 M NaCl, 1 mM quinine, 0.32 M NaCl) sampled with the whole mouth. Smell function was assessed with a Pocket Smell Test™ (PST; eight-item odor identification test). The CSQ asked about chemosensory problems, distortions, and age-related changes. Broader baseline measurements were a 40-item olfactometer-generated identification task and additional whole-mouth taste intensities (1 M sucrose, 32 mM citric acid, 3.2 mM propylthiouracil). RESULTS: Intraclass correlations (ICCs) for NHANES taste measures showed moderate-to-good agreement after 2 weeks and 6 months (ICCs 0.42-0.71). Whole-mouth quinine intensity was significantly correlated with other taste intensities, supporting its utility as a marker for overall taste functioning. Olfactory classification from PSTs agreed for 98.5 % of participants across 2 weeks (κ=0.85; 95 % CI 0.71-0.99) and had good correspondence with the olfactometer task. CSQ items showed good-to-excellent agreement over 6 months (ICCs 0.66-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: These findings further support that the NHANES chemosensory protocol has moderate-to-good test-retest reliability when administered to healthy, educated adults. Despite being a brief procedure with limited measures, the NHANES taste and smell assessments provided good information when compared to broader measures of taste and smell function.
INTRODUCTION: The US NHANES 2011-2014 protocol includes a taste and smell questionnaire (CSQ) in home-based interviews and brief assessments in mobile exam centers. We report the short- and longer-term test-retest reliability and validity of this protocol against broader chemosensory measures. METHODS: A convenience sample of 73 adults (age=39.5±20.8 years) underwent the NHANES protocol at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 months. For taste, participants rated intensities of two tastants (1 M NaCl, 1 mM quinine) applied to the tongue tip and three tastants (1 M NaCl, 1 mM quinine, 0.32 M NaCl) sampled with the whole mouth. Smell function was assessed with a Pocket Smell Test™ (PST; eight-item odor identification test). The CSQ asked about chemosensory problems, distortions, and age-related changes. Broader baseline measurements were a 40-item olfactometer-generated identification task and additional whole-mouth taste intensities (1 M sucrose, 32 mM citric acid, 3.2 mM propylthiouracil). RESULTS: Intraclass correlations (ICCs) for NHANES taste measures showed moderate-to-good agreement after 2 weeks and 6 months (ICCs 0.42-0.71). Whole-mouth quinine intensity was significantly correlated with other taste intensities, supporting its utility as a marker for overall taste functioning. Olfactory classification from PSTs agreed for 98.5 % of participants across 2 weeks (κ=0.85; 95 % CI 0.71-0.99) and had good correspondence with the olfactometer task. CSQ items showed good-to-excellent agreement over 6 months (ICCs 0.66-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: These findings further support that the NHANES chemosensory protocol has moderate-to-good test-retest reliability when administered to healthy, educated adults. Despite being a brief procedure with limited measures, the NHANES taste and smell assessments provided good information when compared to broader measures of taste and smell function.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bitter; Health status; NHANES; Psychophysics; Smell perception; Taste perception
Authors: Elizabeth M Krantz; C R Schubert; D S Dalton; W Zhong; G H Huang; B E K Klein; R Klein; F J Nieto; K J Cruickshanks Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Susan E Coldwell; Julie A Mennella; Valerie B Duffy; Marcia L Pelchat; James W Griffith; Gregory Smutzer; Beverly J Cowart; Paul A S Breslin; Linda M Bartoshuk; Lloyd Hastings; David Victorson; Howard J Hoffman Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Shristi Rawal; John E Hayes; Margaret R Wallace; Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy Journal: Chem Senses Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 3.160
Authors: Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Carla R Schubert; Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; James S Pankow; Guan-Hua Huang; Derek J Snyder Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Claire Murphy; Carla R Schubert; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; David M Nondahl Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sarah-Grace Glennon; Tania Huedo-Medina; Shristi Rawal; Howard J Hoffman; Mark D Litt; Valerie B Duffy Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.244