Literature DB >> 20380843

Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

John E Hayes1, Bridget S Sullivan, Valerie B Duffy.   

Abstract

Our sodium-rich food supply compels investigation of how variation in salt sensation influences liking and intake of high-sodium foods. While supertasters (those with heightened propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness or taste papillae number) report greater saltiness from concentrated salt solutions, the non-taster/supertaster effect on sodium intake is unclear. We assessed taster effects on salt sensation, liking and intake among 87 healthy adults (45 men). PROP bitterness showed stronger associations with perceived saltiness in foods than did papillae number. Supertasters reported: greater saltiness in chips/pretzels and broth at levels comparable to regular-sodium products; greater sensory and/or liking changes to growing sodium concentration in cheeses (where sodium ions mask bitterness) and broths; and less frequently salting foods. PROP effects were attenuated in women. Compared with men, women reported more saltiness from high-sodium foods and greater liking for broth at salt levels comparable to regular-sodium products. Across men and women, Structural Equation Models showed PROP and papillae number independently explained variability in consuming high-sodium foods by impacting salt sensation and/or liking. PROP supertasters reported greater changes in sensation when more salt was added to broth, which then associated with greater changes in broth liking, and finally with more frequent high-sodium food intake. Greater papillae number was associated with less frequent high-sodium food intake via reduced liking for high-fat/high-sodium foods. In summary, variation in sensations from salt was associated with differences in hedonic responses to high-sodium foods and thus sodium intake. Despite adding less salt, PROP supertasters consumed more sodium through food, as salt was more important to preference, both for its salty taste and masking of bitterness. (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380843      PMCID: PMC2874635          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  59 in total

1.  NaCl thresholds: relationship to anterior tongue locus, area of stimulation, and number of fungiform papillae.

Authors:  R L Doty; R Bagla; M Morgenson; N Mirza
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-02

2.  Comparison of the 60- and 100-item NCI-block questionnaires with validation data.

Authors:  N Potischman; R J Carroll; S J Iturria; B Mittl; J Curtin; F E Thompson; L A Brinton
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.900

3.  Chronic sodium chloride challenge studies in man.

Authors:  D BALDWIN; R W ALEXANDER; E G WARNER
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1960-03

4.  Preferences and intake measures of salt and sugar, and their relation to personality traits.

Authors:  L J Stone; R M Pangborn
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.

Authors:  M E Dinehart; J E Hayes; L M Bartoshuk; S L Lanier; V B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-12-20

6.  Sex differences in electrophysiological and behavioral responses to NaCl taste.

Authors:  Kathleen S Curtis; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Cross-cultural differences in simple taste preferences.

Authors:  H W Moskowitz; V Kumaraiah; K N Sharma; H L Jacobs; S D Sharma
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-12-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Sensory influences on salt, sugar and fat intake.

Authors:  R Shepherd
Journal:  Nutr Res Rev       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 7.800

9.  Associations between taste genetics, oral sensation and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Julie M Peterson; Linda M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-09-15

10.  Lingual tactile acuity, taste perception, and the density and diameter of fungiform papillae in female subjects.

Authors:  Greg K Essick; Anita Chopra; Steve Guest; Francis McGlone
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-11
View more
  54 in total

1.  Interpreting consumer preferences: physicohedonic and psychohedonic models yield different information in a coffee-flavored dairy beverage.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.565

2.  Maximizing overall liking results in a superior product to minimizing deviations from ideal ratings: an optimization case study with coffee-flavored milk.

Authors:  Bangde Li; John E Hayes; Gregory R Ziegler
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.565

3.  The associations between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) intensity and taste intensities differ by TAS2R38 haplotype.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; James S Pankow; Nathan Pankratz; Carla R Schubert; Guan-Hua Huang; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Alex Pinto
Journal:  J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Intensity of Salt Taste and Prevalence of Hypertension Are Not Related in the Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; Alex Pinto; Carla R Schubert; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; F Javier Nieto; James S Pankow; Derek J Snyder; Brendan J Keating
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 1.833

5.  Putting out the fire - Efficacy of common beverages in reducing oral burn from capsaicin.

Authors:  Alissa A Nolden; Gabrielle Lenart; John E Hayes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-05-21

6.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Shristi Rawal; Jeeha Park; Mark H Brand; Mastaneh Sharafi; Bradley W Bolling
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Behavioral measures of risk tasking, sensation seeking and sensitivity to reward may reflect different motivations for spicy food liking and consumption.

Authors:  Nadia K Byrnes; John E Hayes
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Wine Expertise Predicts Taste Phenotype.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Gary J Pickering
Journal:  Am J Enol Vitic       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.