Literature DB >> 12425708

Prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults.

Claire Murphy1, Carla R Schubert, Karen J Cruickshanks, Barbara E K Klein, Ronald Klein, David M Nondahl.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Older adults represent the fastest-growing segment of the US population, and prevalences of vision and hearing impairment have been extensively evaluated. However, despite the importance of sense of smell for nutrition and safety, the prevalence of olfactory impairment in older US adults has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of olfactory impairment in older adults. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2491 Beaver Dam, Wis, residents aged 53 to 97 years participating in the 5-year follow-up examination (1998-2000) for the Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study, a population-based, cross-sectional study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Olfactory impairment, assessed by the San Diego Odor Identification Test and self-report.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) prevalence of impaired olfaction was 24.5% (1.7%). The prevalence increased with age; 62.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.4%-67.7%) of 80- to 97-year-olds had olfactory impairment. Olfactory impairment was more prevalent among men (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.65-2.19). Current smoking, stroke, epilepsy, and nasal congestion or upper respiratory tract infection were also associated with increased prevalence of olfactory impairment. Self-reported olfactory impairment was low (9.5%) and this measure became less accurate with age. In the oldest group, aged 80 to 97 years, sensitivity of self-report was 12% for women and 18% for men.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that prevalence of olfactory impairment among older adults is high and increases with age. Self-report significantly underestimated prevalence rates obtained by olfaction testing. Physicians and caregivers should be particularly alert to the potential for olfactory impairment in the elderly population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12425708     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  292 in total

1.  Olfactory function in Wave 2 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.

Authors:  David W Kern; Kristen E Wroblewski; L Philip Schumm; Jayant M Pinto; Rachel C Chen; Martha K McClintock
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Genetic and environmental influences on odor identification ability in the very old.

Authors:  Richard L Doty; Inge Petersen; Nii Mensah; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-05-30

Review 3.  Olfactory improvement after endoscopic sinus surgery.

Authors:  Luke Rudmik; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding; Peter Hellings; Isam Alobid; Claus Bachert; Wytske Fokkens; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Philippe Gevaert; Josep Guilemany; Livije Kalogjera; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol; Giovanni Passalacqua; Elina Toskala; Cornelius van Drunen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.871

5.  Semantic networks for odors and colors in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Jill Razani; Agnes Chan; Steven Nordin; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Age-related changes in p2 odorant receptor mapping in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Richard M Costanzo; Masayoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  [Treatment of olfactory disorders].

Authors:  T Hummel; B A Stuck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Osmophobia and olfactory functions in patients with migraine.

Authors:  Gürkan Kayabaşoglu; Aytug Altundag; Dilcan Kotan; Denizhan Dizdar; Recep Kaymaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Smoking and olfactory dysfunction: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gaurav S Ajmani; Helen H Suh; Kristen E Wroblewski; Jayant M Pinto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Intranasal vitamin A is beneficial in post-infectious olfactory loss.

Authors:  Thomas Hummel; Katherine L Whitcroft; Gina Rueter; Antje Haehner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.