Literature DB >> 16368118

Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.

M E Dinehart1, J E Hayes, L M Bartoshuk, S L Lanier, V B Duffy.   

Abstract

Intake of vegetables falls short of recommendations to lower risk of chronic diseases. Most research addresses bitterness as a sensory deterrent to consuming vegetables. We examined bitter and sweet sensations from vegetables as mediators of vegetable preference and intake as well as how these tastes vary with markers of genetic variation in taste (3.2 mM 6-n-propylthiouracil bitterness) and taste pathology (1.0 mM quinine bitterness, chorda tympani nerve relative to whole mouth). Seventy-one females and 39 males (18-60 years) reported prototypical tastes from and preference for Brussels sprouts, kale and asparagus as well as servings of vegetables consumed, excluding salad and potatoes. Intensity and hedonic ratings were made with the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. Data were analyzed with multiple linear regression and structural equation modeling. Vegetable sweetness and bitterness were independent predictors of more or less preference for sampled vegetables and vegetable intake, respectively. Those who taste PROP as most bitter also tasted the vegetables as most bitter and least sweet. The spatial pattern of quinine bitterness, suggestive of insult to chorda tympani taste fibers, was associated with less bitterness and sweetness from vegetables. Via structural equation modeling, PROP best explained variability in vegetable preference and intake via vegetable bitterness whereas the quinine marker explained variability in vegetable preference and intake via vegetable bitterness and sweetness. In summary, bitterness and sweetness of sampled vegetables varied by taste genetic and taste function markers, which explained differences in preference for vegetables tasted in the laboratory as well as overall vegetable intake outside the laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368118     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  86 in total

1.  Family members' influence on family meal vegetable choices.

Authors:  Tionni R Wenrich; J Lynne Brown; Michelle Miller-Day; Kevin J Kelley; Eugene J Lengerich
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.045

2.  Shared genetic contributions of fruit and vegetable consumption with BMI in families 20 y after sharing a household.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Seung-Yeon Lee; Sarah C Couch; John Morrison; Jessica G Woo
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 3.  Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Howard R Moskowitz; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Taste and the Gastrointestinal tract: from physiology to potential therapeutic target for obesity.

Authors:  Giovanni Sarnelli; Giuseppe Annunziata; Silvia Magno; Claudia Oriolo; Silvia Savastano; Annamaria Colao
Journal:  Int J Obes Suppl       Date:  2019-04-12

5.  Gustation assessment using the NIH Toolbox.

Authors:  Susan E Coldwell; Julie A Mennella; Valerie B Duffy; Marcia L Pelchat; James W Griffith; Gregory Smutzer; Beverly J Cowart; Paul A S Breslin; Linda M Bartoshuk; Lloyd Hastings; David Victorson; Howard J Hoffman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Taking the bitter with the sweet: relationship of supertasting and sweet preference with metabolic syndrome and dietary intake.

Authors:  Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate; Dominic Moore; Barry Popkin
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.167

7.  Regional differences in suprathreshold intensity for bitter and umami stimuli.

Authors:  Emma L Feeney; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Veronica Galindo-Cuspinera; Thierry Waeber; Nicolas Antille; Christoph Hartmann; Nicola Stead; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.833

9.  Variation in the gene TAS2R38 is associated with the eating behavior disinhibition in Old Order Amish women.

Authors:  Cedrick D Dotson; Hillary L Shaw; Braxton D Mitchell; Steven D Munger; Nanette I Steinle
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Shristi Rawal; Jeeha Park; Mark H Brand; Mastaneh Sharafi; Bradley W Bolling
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.