Literature DB >> 27768611

Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

David L Horn1, Jong Ho Won, Jay T Rubinstein, Lynne A Werner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Spectral resolution is a correlate of open-set speech understanding in postlingually deaf adults and prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants (CIs). To apply measures of spectral resolution to assess device efficacy in younger CI users, it is necessary to understand how spectral resolution develops in normal-hearing children. In this study, spectral ripple discrimination (SRD) was used to measure listeners' sensitivity to a shift in phase of the spectral envelope of a broadband noise. Both resolution of peak to peak location (frequency resolution) and peak to trough intensity (across-channel intensity resolution) are required for SRD.
DESIGN: SRD was measured as the highest ripple density (in ripples per octave) for which a listener could discriminate a 90° shift in phase of the sinusoidally-modulated amplitude spectrum. A 2 × 3 between-subjects design was used to assess the effects of age (7-month-old infants versus adults) and ripple peak/trough "depth" (10, 13, and 20 dB) on SRD in normal-hearing listeners (experiment 1). In experiment 2, SRD thresholds in the same age groups were compared using a task in which ripple starting phases were randomized across trials to obscure within-channel intensity cues. In experiment 3, the randomized starting phase method was used to measure SRD as a function of age (3-month-old infants, 7-month-old infants, and young adults) and ripple depth (10 and 20 dB in repeated measures design).
RESULTS: In experiment 1, there was a significant interaction between age and ripple depth. The infant SRDs were significantly poorer than the adult SRDs at 10 and 13 dB ripple depths but adult-like at 20 dB depth. This result is consistent with immature across-channel intensity resolution. In contrast, the trajectory of SRD as a function of depth was steeper for infants than adults suggesting that frequency resolution was better in infants than adults. However, in experiment 2 infant performance was significantly poorer than adults at 20 dB depth suggesting that variability of infants' use of within-channel intensity cues, rather than better frequency resolution, explained the results of experiment 1. In experiment 3, age effects were seen with both groups of infants showing poorer SRD than adults but, unlike experiment 1, no significant interaction between age and depth was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of SRD thresholds in individual 3 to 7-month-old infants is feasible. Performance of normal-hearing infants on SRD may be limited by across-channel intensity resolution despite mature frequency resolution. These findings have significant implications for design and stimulus choice for applying SRD for testing infants with CIs. The high degree of variability in infant SRD can be somewhat reduced by obscuring within-channel cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27768611      PMCID: PMC5321869          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  55 in total

1.  Ripple depth and density resolution of rippled noise.

Authors:  V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Psychoacoustic performance and music and speech perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Kyu Hwan Jung; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Elyse Jameyson; Gary Miyasaki; Susan J Norton; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".

Authors:  Aaron C Moberly; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory frequency sensitivity of human newborns: some data with improved acoustic and behavioral controls.

Authors:  C Weir
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1979-10

6.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise.

Authors:  P Allen; F Wightman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-02

7.  Masking by a remote-frequency noise band in children and adults.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Donna L Neff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jacob J Oleson; Kate Gfeller; Jillian Crosson; Virginia D Driscoll; Jong Ho Won; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Measuring sound detection and reaction time in infant and toddler cochlear implant recipients using an observer-based procedure: a first report.

Authors:  Vasant K Dasika; Lynne A Werner; Susan J Norton; Kaibao Nie; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Environmental Sound Awareness and Speech Recognition Skills in Experienced Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Lauren Boyce; David B Pisoni; Valeriy Shafiro; Aaron C Moberly
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.

Authors:  Jesse M Resnick; David L Horn; Anisha R Noble; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplitude modulation detection and temporal modulation cutoff frequency in normal hearing infants.

Authors:  Brian A Walker; Caitlin M Gerhards; Lynne A Werner; David L Horn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Electrophysiological responses to spectral ripple envelope phase inversion in typical hearing 2- to 4-month-olds.

Authors:  David Horn; Max Walter; Jay Rubinstein; Bonnie K Lau
Journal:  Proc Meet Acoust       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Infant Pitch and Timbre Discrimination in the Presence of Variation in the Other Dimension.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Andrew J Oxenham; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 6.  Spectral Resolution Development in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants: A Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Kelly N Jahn; Julie G Arenberg; David L Horn
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.674

7.  The contribution of spectral processing to the acquisition of phonological sensitivity by adolescent cochlear implant users and normal-hearing controls.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein; Donal G Sinex
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.