Literature DB >> 10573895

Ripple depth and density resolution of rippled noise.

V V Popov, O N Milekhina, M B Tarakanov.   

Abstract

Depth resolution of spectral ripples was measured in normal humans using a phase-reversal test. The principle of the test was to find the lowest ripple depth at which an interchange of peak and trough position (the phase reversal) in the rippled spectrum is detectable. Using this test, ripple-depth thresholds were measured as a function of ripple density of octave-band rippled noise at center frequencies from 0.5 to 8 kHz. The ripple-depth threshold in the power domain was around 0.2 at low ripple densities of 4-5 relative units (center-frequency-to-ripple-spacing ratio) or 3-3.5 ripples/oct. The threshold increased with the ripple density increase. It reached the highest possible level of 1.0 at ripple density from 7.5 relative units at 0.5 kHz center frequency to 14.3 relative units at 8 kHz (5.2 to 10.0 ripple/oct, respectively). The interrelation between the ripple depth threshold and ripple density can be satisfactorily described by transfer of the signal by frequency-tuned auditory filters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573895     DOI: 10.1121/1.428105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  The effect of sound intensity on the frequency resolving power of hearing and the effect of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin; V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

2.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Gary L Jones; Ward R Drennan; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear implant users' spectral ripple resolution.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jeon; Christopher W Turner; Sue A Karsten; Belinda A Henry; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Some problems in the measurement of the frequency-resolving ability of hearing.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

5.  Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.

Authors:  David L Horn; Daniel J Dudley; Kavita Dedhia; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A cocktail party with a cortical twist: how cortical mechanisms contribute to sound segregation.

Authors:  Mounya Elhilali; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Discrimination of the spectral structures of sound signals on the background of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-07-08

8.  Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-21

9.  How Do Age and Hearing Loss Impact Spectral Envelope Perception?

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Different patterns of perceptual learning on spectral modulation detection between older hearing-impaired and younger normal-hearing adults.

Authors:  Andrew T Sabin; Cynthia A Clark; David A Eddins; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.