Literature DB >> 19194288

Measuring sound detection and reaction time in infant and toddler cochlear implant recipients using an observer-based procedure: a first report.

Vasant K Dasika1, Lynne A Werner, Susan J Norton, Kaibao Nie, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: First, to establish the feasibility of the observer-based psychophysical procedure (OPP) in measuring sound detection in infant and toddler cochlear implant (CI) recipients. Second, to measure the psychometric function for detection (PFD) from individual subjects. Third, to determine whether reaction time (RT) provides information about the auditory sensitivity of young CI users.
DESIGN: Twelve CI recipients, 11 to 32 mo old, participated in our study. Initially, tones were presented in sound field, and children learned to respond when they heard tones but not at other times. Once an 80% correct criterion was met in sound field, a novel stimulation paradigm was used to present stimuli to a single electrode while the child listened to acoustic input on most other electrodes using their usual map. The PFD and RT were measured using this single-electrode stimulation paradigm.
RESULTS: Eleven subjects met criterion, 6 within the minimum possible number of trials. For eight subjects, the asymptotic level of detecting single-electrode stimuli averaged 86% correct, similar to levels achieved by normal-hearing infants and toddlers detecting pure tones. The PFD slope of infant and toddler CI recipients was less than or equal to the slope for adult CI users reported in previous studies. RT decreased significantly with stimulus level in four children.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that psychophysical detection data can be obtained from infant and toddler CI recipients using OPP. The PFD of young CI users may be shallower than that of adult CI users. Relatively good asymptotic detection performance implies that young CI users are more attentive to sound than has been suggested in previous studies. RT tended to be a less reliable measure of detection, but methodological changes could improve its utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194288      PMCID: PMC4900453          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181986dfe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  34 in total

1.  Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Kirill V Nourski; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparison of absolute thresholds derived from an adaptive forced-choice procedure and from reaction probabilities and reaction times in a simple reaction time paradigm.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer; Andreas Tiefenau; Hellmut von Specht
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-07-06

3.  Developmental changes in masked thresholds.

Authors:  B A Schneider; S E Trehub; B A Morrongiello; L A Thorpe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  A reaction-time analysis of electrocochlear stimulation in cats.

Authors:  R A Walloch; J A Fenwick; R Boberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Music recognition by Japanese children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Takayuki Nakata; Sandra E Trehub; Chisato Mitani; Yukihiko Kanda; Atsuko Shibasaki; E Glenn Schellenberg
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci       Date:  2005-01

6.  Bimodal speech perception in infant hearing aid and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Brittan A Barker; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

7.  Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children.

Authors:  Carol Olszewski; Kate Gfeller; Rebecca Froman; Julie Stordahl; Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2005-09

8.  Speech perception skills of deaf infants following cochlear implantation: a first report.

Authors:  Derek M Houston; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Elizabeth A Ying; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.675

9.  Ten-year follow-up of a consecutive series of children with multichannel cochlear implants.

Authors:  Alain S Uziel; Martine Sillon; Adrienne Vieu; Françoise Artieres; Jean-Pierre Piron; Jean-Pierre Daures; Michel Mondain
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Infant psychometric functions for detection: mechanisms of immature sensitivity.

Authors:  J Y Bargones; L A Werner; G C Marean
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christopher G Clinard; Seeyoun Kwon; Vasant K Dasika; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Kelly L Tremblay; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-27

2.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A Two-Interval, Forced-Choice, Observer-Based Procedure for Evaluating Hearing Sensitivity in Children With Motor and Developmental Impairments.

Authors:  Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Jenna Browning; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Validation of a clinical assessment of spectral-ripple resolution for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Elizabeth S Anderson; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.