Literature DB >> 25177899

Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users.

Ward R Drennan1, Jacob J Oleson, Kate Gfeller, Jillian Crosson, Virginia D Driscoll, Jong Ho Won, Elizabeth S Anderson, Jay T Rubinstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to evaluate the relationships among music perception, appraisal, and experience in cochlear implant users in multiple clinical settings and to examine the viability of two assessments designed for clinical use.
DESIGN: Background questionnaires (IMBQ) were administered by audiologists in 14 clinics in the United States and Canada. The CAMP included tests of pitch-direction discrimination, and melody and timbre recognition. The IMBQ queried users on prior musical involvement, music listening habits pre and post implant, and music appraisals. STUDY SAMPLE: One-hundred forty-five users of Advanced Bionics and Cochlear Ltd cochlear implants.
RESULTS: Performance on pitch direction discrimination, melody recognition, and timbre recognition tests were consistent with previous studies with smaller cohorts, as well as with more extensive protocols conducted in other centers. Relationships between perceptual accuracy and music enjoyment were weak, suggesting that perception and appraisal are relatively independent for CI users.
CONCLUSIONS: Perceptual abilities as measured by the CAMP had little to no relationship with music appraisals and little relationship with musical experience. The CAMP and IMBQ are feasible for routine clinical use, providing results consistent with previous thorough laboratory-based investigations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Music; cochlear implant; hearing impairment; music appraisal; music perception

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25177899      PMCID: PMC4297259          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2014.948219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  39 in total

1.  Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels.

Authors:  A Gabrielsson; B Hagerman; T Bech-Kristensen; G Lundberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Cochlear implant-mediated perception of music.

Authors:  Charles J Limb
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Psychoacoustic abilities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Robert S Kang; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Speech understanding and aging. Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging. Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Varieties of musical disorders. The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.

Authors:  Isabelle Peretz; Annie Sophie Champod; Krista Hyde
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  MUSIC APPRECIATION AND TRAINING FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANT RECIPIENTS: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Valerie Looi; Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2012-11-19

7.  Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson; Virginia Driscoll; John F Knutson
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children.

Authors:  Carol Olszewski; Kate Gfeller; Rebecca Froman; Julie Stordahl; Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2005-09

10.  Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Grace L Nimmons; Robert S Kang; Ward R Drennan; Jeff Longnion; Chad Ruffin; Tina Worman; Bevan Yueh; Jay T Rubenstien
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  21 in total

1.  Hybrid Music Perception Outcomes: Implications for Melody and Timbre Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Aaron J Parkinson; Jay T Rubinstein; Ward R Drennan; Christa Dodson; Kaibao Nie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Beyond Technology: The Interaction of Perceptual Accuracy and Experiential Factors in Pediatric Music Engagement.

Authors:  Kate Gfeller; Virginia Driscoll; Adam Schwalje
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  The impact of electric hearing on children's timbre and pitch perception and talker discrimination.

Authors:  Kristin M Sjoberg; Virginia D Driscoll; Kate Gfeller; Anne E Welhaven; Karen Iler Kirk; Lindsay Prusick
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-01-18

4.  Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Damien Bonnard; Adam Schwalje; Bruce Gantz; Inyong Choi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Spectral Ripple Discrimination in Normal-Hearing Infants.

Authors:  David L Horn; Jong Ho Won; Jay T Rubinstein; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effect of signal processing strategy and stimulation type on speech and auditory perception in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Susan M Reynolds; René H Gifford
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Pitch Accuracy of Vocal Singing in Deaf Children With Bimodal Hearing and Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Li Xu; Jing Yang; Emily Hahn; Rosalie Uchanski; Lisa Davidson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Bimodal Benefit for Music Perception: Effect of Acoustic Bandwidth.

Authors:  Kristen L D'Onofrio; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 9.  Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization.

Authors:  Tiffany P Hwa; Christopher Z Wen; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 10.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.