Literature DB >> 27677749

Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Juyong Lee1, Florentina Tofoleanu2, Frank C Pickard2, Gerhard König2, Jing Huang2,3, Ana Damjanović2, Minkyung Baek4, Chaok Seok4, Bernard R Brooks2.   

Abstract

Herein, we report the absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge. Initial conformations of CBClip complexes were obtained using docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Free energy calculations were performed using thermodynamic integration (TI) with soft-core potentials and Bennett's acceptance ratio (BAR) method based on a serial insertion scheme. We compared the results obtained with TI simulations with soft-core potentials and Hamiltonian replica exchange simulations with the serial insertion method combined with the BAR method. The results show that the difference between the two methods can be mainly attributed to the van der Waals free energies, suggesting that either the simulations used for TI or the simulations used for BAR, or both are not fully converged and the two sets of simulations may have sampled difference phase space regions. The penalty scores of force field parameters of the 10 guest molecules provided by CHARMM Generalized Force Field can be an indicator of the accuracy of binding free energy calculations. Among our submissions, the combination of docking and TI performed best, which yielded the root mean square deviation of 2.94 kcal/mol and an average unsigned error of 3.41 kcal/mol for the ten guest molecules. These values were best overall among all participants. However, our submissions had little correlation with experiments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute binding free energy calculation; Bennett’s acceptance ratio; Constant-pH simulation; Double decoupling scheme; Hamiltonian replica exchange; Host-guest complexes; Thermodynamic integration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27677749      PMCID: PMC5241186          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9968-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  68 in total

1.  Unbiased global optimization of Lennard-Jones clusters for N < or =201 using the conformational space annealing method.

Authors:  Julian Lee; In-Ho Lee; Jooyoung Lee
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Replica-exchange method in van der Waals radius space: overcoming steric restrictions for biomolecules.

Authors:  Satoru G Itoh; Hisashi Okumura; Yuko Okamoto
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Evaluation of GalaxyDock Based on the Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Benchmark Studies.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Gyu Rie Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 4.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

5.  Unorthodox uses of Bennett's acceptance ratio method.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Stefan Bruckner; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  LigDockCSA: protein-ligand docking using conformational space annealing.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Lim Heo; Juyong Lee; Junsu Ko; Chaok Seok; Jooyoung Lee
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Fast prediction of hydration free energies for SAMPL4 blind test from a classical density functional theory.

Authors:  Jia Fu; Yu Liu; Jianzhong Wu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 8.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Prabhu Raman; A D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 10.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  7 in total

1.  Origin of pKa Shifts of Internal Lysine Residues in SNase Studied Via Equal-Molar VMMS Simulations in Explicit Water.

Authors:  Xiongwu Wu; Juyong Lee; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.

Authors:  Naohiro Nishikawa; Kyungreem Han; Xiongwu Wu; Florentina Tofoleanu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Obtaining QM/MM binding free energies in the SAMPL8 drugs of abuse challenge: indirect approaches.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Luke Warrensford; Benjamin C Pollard; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael R Jones; H Lee Woodcock; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.179

Review 4.  Overview of the SAMPL5 host-guest challenge: Are we doing better?

Authors:  Jian Yin; Niel M Henriksen; David R Slochower; Michael R Shirts; Michael W Chiu; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.

Authors:  Mahdi Ghorbani; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Jeffery B Klauda; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  SAMPL7 Host-Guest Challenge Overview: assessing the reliability of polarizable and non-polarizable methods for binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Martin Amezcua; Léa El Khoury; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Identifying the Hot Spot Residues of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Using MM-PBSA and Multiple Force Fields.

Authors:  Jinyoung Byun; Juyong Lee
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.