Literature DB >> 30324304

Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.

Naohiro Nishikawa1, Kyungreem Han2, Xiongwu Wu2, Florentina Tofoleanu2, Bernard R Brooks2.   

Abstract

We calculate the absolute binding free energies of tetra-methylated octa-acids host-guest systems as a part of the SAMPL6 blind challenge (receipt ID vq30p). We employed two different free energy simulation methods, i.e., the umbrella sampling (US) and double decoupling method (DDM). The US method was used with the weighted histogram analysis method (WHAM) (US-WHAM scheme). In the DDM scheme, Hamiltonian replica-exchange method (HREM) was combined with the Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR) (HREM-BAR scheme). We obtained initial binding poses via molecular docking using GalaxyDock-HG program, which is developed for the SAMPL challenge. The root mean square deviation (RMSD) and the mean absolute deviations (MAD) using US-WHAM scheme were 1.33 and 1.02 kcal/mol, respectively. The MAD was the top among all submissions, however the correlation with respect to experiment was unexceptional. While the RMSD and MAD via HREM-BAR scheme were greater than US-WHAM scheme, (i.e., 2.09 and 1.76 kcal/mol), their correlations were slightly better than US-WHAM. The correlation between the two methods was high. Further discussion on the DDM method can be found in a companion paper by Han et al. (receipt ID 3z83m) in the same issue.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bennett acceptance ratio; Binding free energy calculation; Double decoupling; Hamiltonian replica-exchange; Umbrella sampling; Weighted histogram analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30324304      PMCID: PMC6413509          DOI: 10.1007/s10822-018-0166-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  37 in total

Review 1.  The many roles of computation in drug discovery.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Equilibrium free energies from nonequilibrium measurements using maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Eric Bair; Giles Hooker; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Replica-exchange method in van der Waals radius space: overcoming steric restrictions for biomolecules.

Authors:  Satoru G Itoh; Hisashi Okumura; Yuko Okamoto
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Evaluation of GalaxyDock Based on the Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Benchmark Studies.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Gyu Rie Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Predicting absolute ligand binding free energies to a simple model site.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Alan P Graves; John D Chodera; Andrea C McReynolds; Brian K Shoichet; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Unorthodox uses of Bennett's acceptance ratio method.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Stefan Bruckner; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  LigDockCSA: protein-ligand docking using conformational space annealing.

Authors:  Woong-Hee Shin; Lim Heo; Juyong Lee; Junsu Ko; Chaok Seok; Jooyoung Lee
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 10.  The SAMPL4 host-guest blind prediction challenge: an overview.

Authors:  Hari S Muddana; Andrew T Fenley; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  10 in total

1.  Enhanced Jarzynski free energy calculations using weighted ensemble.

Authors:  Nicole M Roussey; Alex Dickson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Predicting partition coefficients of drug-like molecules in the SAMPL6 challenge with Drude polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Ye Ding; You Xu; Cheng Qian; Jinfeng Chen; Jian Zhu; Houhou Huang; Yi Shi; Jing Huang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  SAMPL6 host-guest binding affinities and binding poses from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun; Qiaole He; Xiao Li; Zhengdan Zhu
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Binding Thermodynamics of Host-Guest Systems with SMIRNOFF99Frosst 1.0.5 from the Open Force Field Initiative.

Authors:  David R Slochower; Niel M Henriksen; Lee-Ping Wang; John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Drug-Target Binding by Molecular Simulation.

Authors:  Sergio Decherchi; Andrea Cavalli
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Prediction of CB[8] host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL6 using the double-decoupling method.

Authors:  Kyungreem Han; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Naohiro Nishikawa; Florentina Tofoleanu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding affinities from extensive alchemical and end-point free energy calculations.

Authors:  Zhe Huai; Huaiyu Yang; Xiao Li; Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  SAMPL7 TrimerTrip host-guest binding poses and binding affinities from spherical-coordinates-biased simulations.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Sun
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  A replica exchange umbrella sampling (REUS) approach to predict host-guest binding free energies in SAMPL8 challenge.

Authors:  Mahdi Ghorbani; Phillip S Hudson; Michael R Jones; Félix Aviat; Rubén Meana-Pañeda; Jeffery B Klauda; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  SAMPL7: Host-guest binding prediction by molecular dynamics and quantum mechanics.

Authors:  Yiğitcan Eken; Nuno M S Almeida; Cong Wang; Angela K Wilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.