Literature DB >> 23145473

Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) II: assignment of bonded parameters and partial atomic charges.

K Vanommeslaeghe1, E Prabhu Raman, A D MacKerell.   

Abstract

Molecular mechanics force fields are widely used in computer-aided drug design for the study of drug candidates interacting with biological systems. In these simulations, the biological part is typically represented by a specialized biomolecular force field, while the drug is represented by a matching general (organic) force field. In order to apply these general force fields to an arbitrary drug-like molecule, functionality for assignment of atom types, parameters, and partial atomic charges is required. In the present article, algorithms for the assignment of parameters and charges for the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) are presented. These algorithms rely on the existing parameters and charges that were determined as part of the parametrization of the force field. Bonded parameters are assigned based on the similarity between the atom types that define said parameters, while charges are determined using an extended bond-charge increment scheme. Charge increments were optimized to reproduce the charges on model compounds that were part of the parametrization of the force field. A "penalty score" is returned for every bonded parameter and charge, allowing the user to quickly and conveniently assess the quality of the force field representation of different parts of the compound of interest. Case studies are presented to clarify the functioning of the algorithms and the significance of their output data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145473      PMCID: PMC3528813          DOI: 10.1021/ci3003649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  15 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Parameterization of charge model 3 for AM1, PM3, BLYP, and B3LYP.

Authors:  Jason D Thompson; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  Accuracy of free energies of hydration using CM1 and CM3 atomic charges.

Authors:  Marina Udier-Blagović; Patricia Morales De Tirado; Shoshannah A Pearlman; William L Jorgensen
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Development and testing of a general amber force field.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Romain M Wolf; James W Caldwell; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 5.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Automatic atom type and bond type perception in molecular mechanical calculations.

Authors:  Junmei Wang; Wei Wang; Peter A Kollman; David A Case
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 2.518

Review 7.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Class IV charge models: a new semiempirical approach in quantum chemistry.

Authors:  J W Storer; D J Giesen; C J Cramer; D G Truhlar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Alcohols, ethers, carbohydrates, and related compounds. I. The MM4 force field for simple compounds.

Authors:  Norman L Allinger; Kuo-Hsiang Chen; Jenn-Huei Lii; Kathleen A Durkin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields.

Authors:  K Vanommeslaeghe; E Hatcher; C Acharya; S Kundu; S Zhong; J Shim; E Darian; O Guvench; P Lopes; I Vorobyov; A D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.376

View more
  365 in total

1.  Structure, Dynamics, and Substrate Specificity of the OprO Porin from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Niraj Modi; Sonalli Ganguly; Iván Bárcena-Uribarri; Roland Benz; Bert van den Berg; Ulrich Kleinekathöfer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Small Molecule Inhibitors of Ca(2+)-S100B Reveal Two Protein Conformations.

Authors:  Michael C Cavalier; Mohd Imran Ansari; Adam D Pierce; Paul T Wilder; Laura E McKnight; E Prabhu Raman; David B Neau; Padmavani Bezawada; Milad J Alasady; Thomas H Charpentier; Kristen M Varney; Eric A Toth; Alexander D MacKerell; Andrew Coop; David J Weber
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  An embedded lipid in the multidrug transporter LmrP suggests a mechanism for polyspecificity.

Authors:  Vincent Debruycker; Andrew Hutchin; Matthieu Masureel; Emel Ficici; Chloé Martens; Pierre Legrand; Richard A Stein; Hassane S Mchaourab; José D Faraldo-Gómez; Han Remaut; Cédric Govaerts
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  A two-helix motif positions the lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase active site for catalysis within the membrane bilayer.

Authors:  Rosanna M Robertson; Jiangwei Yao; Stefan Gajewski; Gyanendra Kumar; Erik W Martin; Charles O Rock; Stephen W White
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  Mouse modeling and structural analysis of the p.G307S mutation in human cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) reveal effects on CBS activity but not stability.

Authors:  Sapna Gupta; Simon Kelow; Liqun Wang; Mark D Andrake; Roland L Dunbrack; Warren D Kruger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Design and in Vivo Characterization of A1 Adenosine Receptor Agonists in the Native Ribose and Conformationally Constrained (N)-Methanocarba Series.

Authors:  Dilip K Tosh; Harsha Rao; Amelia Bitant; Veronica Salmaso; Philip Mannes; David I Lieberman; Kelli L Vaughan; Julie A Mattison; Amy C Rothwell; John A Auchampach; Antonella Ciancetta; Naili Liu; Zhenzhong Cui; Zhan-Guo Gao; Marc L Reitman; Oksana Gavrilova; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Molecular mechanism of GPCR-mediated arrestin activation.

Authors:  Naomi R Latorraca; Jason K Wang; Brian Bauer; Raphael J L Townshend; Scott A Hollingsworth; Julia E Olivieri; H Eric Xu; Martha E Sommer; Ron O Dror
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Structure of a pathogen effector reveals the enzymatic mechanism of a novel acetyltransferase family.

Authors:  Zhi-Min Zhang; Ka-Wai Ma; Shuguang Yuan; Youfu Luo; Shushu Jiang; Eva Hawara; Songqin Pan; Wenbo Ma; Jikui Song
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 15.369

10.  A Streamlined, General Approach for Computing Ligand Binding Free Energies and Its Application to GPCR-Bound Cholesterol.

Authors:  Reza Salari; Thomas Joseph; Ruchi Lohia; Jérôme Hénin; Grace Brannigan
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 6.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.