Literature DB >> 26583962

Evaluation of GalaxyDock Based on the Community Structure-Activity Resource 2013 and 2014 Benchmark Studies.

Woong-Hee Shin1, Gyu Rie Lee1, Chaok Seok1.   

Abstract

We analyze the results of the GalaxyDock protein-ligand docking program in the two recent experiments of Community Structure-Activity Resource (CSAR), CSAR 2013 and 2014. GalaxyDock performs global optimization of a modified AutoDock3 energy function by employing the conformational space annealing method. The energy function of GalaxyDock is quite sensitive to atomic clashes. Such energy functions can be effective for sampling physically correct conformations but may not be effective for scoring when conformations are not fully optimized. In phase 1 of CSAR 2013, we successfully selected all four true binders of digoxigenin along with three false positives. However, the energy values were rather high due to insufficient optimization of the conformations docked to homology models. A posteriori relaxation of the model complex structures by GalaxyRefine improved the docking energy values and differentiated the true binders from the false positives better. In the scoring test of CSAR 2013 phase 2, we selected the best poses for each of the two targets. The results of CSAR 2013 phase 3 suggested that an improved method for generating initial conformations for GalaxyDock is necessary for targets involving bulky ligands. Finally, combining existing binding information with GalaxyDock energy-based optimization may be needed for more accurate binding affinity prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26583962     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  6 in total

1.  Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.

Authors:  Maria Kadukova; Sergei Grudinin
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.

Authors:  Naohiro Nishikawa; Kyungreem Han; Xiongwu Wu; Florentina Tofoleanu; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Absolute binding free energies for octa-acids and guests in SAMPL5 : Evaluating binding free energies for octa-acid and guest complexes in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Frank C Pickard Iv; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Absolute binding free energy calculations of CBClip host-guest systems in the SAMPL5 blind challenge.

Authors:  Juyong Lee; Florentina Tofoleanu; Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Jing Huang; Ana Damjanović; Minkyung Baek; Chaok Seok; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  CSAR 2014: A Benchmark Exercise Using Unpublished Data from Pharma.

Authors:  Heather A Carlson; Richard D Smith; Kelly L Damm-Ganamet; Jeanne A Stuckey; Aqeel Ahmed; Maire A Convery; Donald O Somers; Michael Kranz; Patricia A Elkins; Guanglei Cui; Catherine E Peishoff; Millard H Lambert; James B Dunbar
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Galaxy7TM: flexible GPCR-ligand docking by structure refinement.

Authors:  Gyu Rie Lee; Chaok Seok
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.