Eduard J De Valk1, Julia C A Noorduyn2, Eduard L A R Mutsaerts2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. warddevalk@gmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: One of the most important factors leading to revision of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is malrotation of femoral and/or tibial component. Rotation measurements performed on radiographs are limited and less reliable compared to 2D computed tomography (CT). Nowadays, 2D-CT and 3D-CT can be distinguished in measuring rotation of the TKA components. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the most reliable CT techniques in measuring rotation of the TKA components and to investigate possible cut-off points that can be used in the clinician's decision for a possible revision of the TKA. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was performed up to April 2015. Final selections of 12 articles were used in this systematic review. RESULTS: 3D-CT, compared to 2D-CT, is more reliable and shows a high level of intra- and interobserver reliability. Femoral component rotation is measured using the component's posterior condylar line or inner pegs in relation to the epicondylar axis. Five different techniques were used to measure tibial component rotation. The posterior border of the tibial component in relationship to the geometric centre and tibial tubercle was most frequently used. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows a strong preference for 3D-CT to determine the component's rotation following a TKA. The literature shows consensus on the reference points of the femoral component. In measurements of the tibial component, various techniques are used with similar results. No clear cut-off point for revision of malrotated TKA components can be stated because of limited evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
PURPOSE: One of the most important factors leading to revision of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) is malrotation of femoral and/or tibial component. Rotation measurements performed on radiographs are limited and less reliable compared to 2D computed tomography (CT). Nowadays, 2D-CT and 3D-CT can be distinguished in measuring rotation of the TKA components. The aim of this systematic review is to determine the most reliable CT techniques in measuring rotation of the TKA components and to investigate possible cut-off points that can be used in the clinician's decision for a possible revision of the TKA. METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was performed up to April 2015. Final selections of 12 articles were used in this systematic review. RESULTS: 3D-CT, compared to 2D-CT, is more reliable and shows a high level of intra- and interobserver reliability. Femoral component rotation is measured using the component's posterior condylar line or inner pegs in relation to the epicondylar axis. Five different techniques were used to measure tibial component rotation. The posterior border of the tibial component in relationship to the geometric centre and tibial tubercle was most frequently used. CONCLUSION: This systematic review shows a strong preference for 3D-CT to determine the component's rotation following a TKA. The literature shows consensus on the reference points of the femoral component. In measurements of the tibial component, various techniques are used with similar results. No clear cut-off point for revision of malrotated TKA components can be stated because of limited evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Authors: Glade E Roper; Adam D Bloemke; Catherine C Roberts; Mark J Spangehl; Henry D Clarke Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Kars P Valkering; Stefan J Breugem; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Willem E Tuinebreijer; Rutger C I van Geenen Journal: Acta Orthop Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 3.717
Authors: Michael W Maier; Stefan Aschauer; Sebastian I Wolf; Thomas Dreher; Christian Merle; Rudi G Bitsch Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Emma L Robertson; Martin Hengherr; Felix Amsler; Michael T Hirschmann; Dominic T Mathis Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 2.199