Literature DB >> 28467105

The role of cone beam CT in the study of symptomatic total knee arthroplasty (TKA): a 20 cases report.

Cosimo Nardi1, Roberto Buzzi2, Roberto Molteni3, Carlo Cossi4, Chiara Lorini5, Linda Calistri1, Stefano Colagrande1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in the study of the patellar tilt angle and rotational alignment of the femoral/tibial component after total knee arthroplasty and to estimate how metallic artefacts impaired detection of periprosthetic bone structures and bordering tendon-muscle structures.
METHODS: 20 symptomatic total knee arthroplasties were examined using CBCT by three independent observers. The patellar tilt angle and rotational alignment of femoral and tibial components were measured in relation to the femoral flange, transepicondylar axis and tibial tuberosity, respectively. A four-score scale, ranging from "many metallic artefacts" (the structure cannot be identified) to "no metallic artefacts" (the structure can be perfectly identified), was used to judge every structure.
RESULTS: The patellar tilt angle and rotational alignment of the prosthetic components showed very high intra- and interobserver agreements (intraclass correlation coefficient values 0.895-0.975 and 0.891-0.948, respectively). Bone and tendon-muscle structures cannot be identified in the distal part of the femoral component, whereas they can be well identified in the proximal part of the femoral component and in the proximal/middle third of the tibial stem.
CONCLUSION: CBCT was an effective tool, providing reproducible measurements of the patellar tilt angle and the rotational alignment of the femoral/tibial component. Furthermore, it allowed bone and tendon-muscle structures analysis with little impediments from metal artefacts. Advances in knowledge: CBCT allows easy and accurate measurements on the rotational axial plane, unburdened by image quality impairment due to metal artefacts.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28467105      PMCID: PMC5602181          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  39 in total

1.  Technical cost of CT examinations.

Authors:  S Saini; R Sharma; L A Levine; R T Barmson; P F Jordan; J H Thrall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy.

Authors:  Xin Liang; Ivo Lambrichts; Yi Sun; Kathleen Denis; Bassam Hassan; Limin Li; Ruben Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Cone beam CT: a current overview of devices.

Authors:  A Nemtoi; C Czink; D Haba; A Gahleitner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Quantitative evaluation of knee subchondral bone mineral density using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mikael J Turunen; Juha Töyräs; Harri T Kokkonen; Jukka S Jurvelin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

6.  A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results.

Authors:  P Mozzo; C Procacci; A Tacconi; P T Martini; I A Andreis
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Femoral component rotations in different gap tensions in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Joong Il Kim; Sae Hyung Chun; Hyuk Soo Han; Sahnghoon Lee; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Variation in costs of cone beam CT examinations among healthcare systems.

Authors:  H Christell; S Birch; M Hedesiu; K Horner; D Ivanauskaité; O Nackaerts; M Rohlin; C Lindh
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kanniraj Marimuthu; Darren B Chen; Ian A Harris; Emma Wheatley; Carl J Bryant; Samuel J MacDessi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 10.  How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eduard J De Valk; Julia C A Noorduyn; Eduard L A R Mutsaerts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Radiation dose in non-dental cone beam CT applications: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cosimo Nardi; Sergio Salerno; Roberto Molteni; Mariaelena Occhipinti; Giulia Grazzini; Niccolò Norberti; Cesare Cordopatri; Stefano Colagrande
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Repetition of Examination Due to Motion Artifacts in Horizontal Cone Beam CT: Comparison among Three Different Kinds of Head Support.

Authors:  Cosimo Nardi; Gian Giacomo Taliani; Alessandro Castellani; Luisa De Falco; Valeria Selvi; Linda Calistri
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-07-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.