Literature DB >> 29785589

A novel technology for 3D knee prosthesis planning and treatment evaluation using 2D X-ray radiographs: a clinical evaluation.

Guoyan Zheng1, Hagen Hommel2, Alper Akcoltekin3, Benedikt Thelen3, Jan Stifter4, Geert Peersman5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a clinical validation of a novel technology called "3X" which allows for 3D prosthesis planning and treatment evaluation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using only 2D X-ray radiographs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After local institution review board approvals, 3X was evaluated on 43 cases (23 for preoperative planning and 20 for postoperative treatment evaluation). All the patients underwent CT scans according to a standard protocol. The results measured on the CT data were regarded as the ground truth. Additionally, two X-ray images were acquired for each affected leg and were used by 3X technology to derive patient-specific measurements of the leg. In total, we compared seven parameters for planning TKA and five parameters for postoperative prosthesis alignment.
RESULTS: Our experimental results demonstrated that the mean distances between the surface models reconstructed from 2D X-rays and the associated surface models obtained from 3D CT data were smaller than 1.5 mm. The average differences for all angular parameters were smaller than [Formula: see text]. In over 78% cases 3X technology derived the same femoral component size as the CT-based ground truth and this value went down to 70% when 3X technology was used to predict the size of tibial component.
CONCLUSION: 3X is a technology that allows for true 3D preoperative planning and postoperative treatment evaluation based on 2D X-ray radiographs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D–3D reconstruction; Clinical validation; Planning; Total knee arthroplasty; Treatment evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29785589     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1789-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  22 in total

1.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

2.  Comparison of analog 2D and digital 3D preoperative templating for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Atsushi Kobayashi; Yoshinori Ishii; Mitsuhiro Takeda; Hideo Noguchi; Hiroshi Higuchi; Sinichi Toyabe
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  The position and orientation of total knee replacement components: a comparison of conventional radiographs, transverse 2D-CT slices and 3D-CT reconstruction.

Authors:  M T Hirschmann; P Konala; F Amsler; F Iranpour; N F Friederich; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-05

4.  2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models.

Authors:  N Baka; B L Kaptein; M de Bruijne; T van Walsum; J E Giphart; W J Niessen; B P F Lelieveldt
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Automatic X-ray landmark detection and shape segmentation via data-driven joint estimation of image displacements.

Authors:  C Chen; W Xie; J Franke; P A Grutzner; L-P Nolte; G Zheng
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement. The imperial knee protocol.

Authors:  J Henckel; R Richards; K Lozhkin; S Harris; F M Rodriguez y Baena; A R W Barrett; J P Cobb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-11

Review 8.  How to assess femoral and tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty with computed tomography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eduard J De Valk; Julia C A Noorduyn; Eduard L A R Mutsaerts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  2D versus 3D templating in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Leif Claassen; Peter Paes; Tilman Calliess
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  A novel system for thE 3-D reconstruction of the human spine and rib cage from biplanar X-ray images.

Authors:  F Cheriet; C Laporte; S Kadoury; H Labelle; J Dansereau
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.538

View more
  2 in total

1.  CT-Based 3D Reconstruction of Lower Limb Versus X-Ray-Based 3D Reconstruction: A Comparative Analysis and Application for a Safe and Cost-Effective Modality in TKA.

Authors:  Vivek Shetty; Yash Wagh; Vikas Karade; Amit Maurya; Mangal Parihar; Sajeev Shekhar; Jignesh Tandel
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  A computational tool for automatic selection of total knee replacement implant size using X-ray images.

Authors:  Thomas A Burge; Gareth G Jones; Christopher M Jordan; Jonathan R T Jeffers; Connor W Myant
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.