Literature DB >> 27628251

Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator.

Thomas S Lendvay1,2, Pasquale Casale3,4, Robert Sweet5, Craig Peters3,6.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery is an accepted adjunct to minimally invasive surgery, but training is restricted to console time. Virtual-reality (VR) simulation has been shown to be effective for laparoscopic training and so we seek to validate a novel VR robotic simulator. The American Urological Association (AUA) Office of Education approved this study. Subjects enrolled in a robotics training course at the 2007 AUA annual meeting underwent skills training in a da Vinci dry-lab module and a virtual-reality robotics module which included a three-dimensional (3D) VR robotic simulator. Demographic and acceptability data were obtained, and performance metrics from the simulator were compared between experienced and nonexperienced roboticists for a ring transfer task. Fifteen subjects-four with previous robotic surgery experience and 11 without-participated. Nine subjects were still in urology training and nearly half of the group had reported playing video games. Overall performance of the da Vinci system and the simulator were deemed acceptable by a Likert scale (0-6) rating of 5.23 versus 4.69, respectively. Experienced subjects outperformed nonexperienced subjects on the simulator on three metrics: total task time (96 s versus 159 s, P < 0.02), economy of motion (1,301 mm versus 2,095 mm, P < 0.04), and time the telemanipulators spent outside of the center of the platform's workspace (4 s versus 35 s, P < 0.02). This is the first demonstration of face and construct validity of a virtual-reality robotic simulator. Further studies assessing predictive validity are ultimately required to support incorporation of VR robotic simulation into training curricula.

Keywords:  Robotic surgery; Simulation education; Virtual reality; da Vinci

Year:  2008        PMID: 27628251     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-008-0099-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  10 in total

1.  Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  P L Figert; A E Park; D B Witzke; R W Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquistion of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator.

Authors:  James D Watterson; Darren T Beiko; James K Kuan; John D Denstedt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; E M Ritter; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Howard Champion; Gerald Higgins; Marvin P Fried; Gerald Moses; C Daniel Smith; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room.

Authors:  James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Rafael Sierra; Dimitris Stefanidis; Cheri L Touchard; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Katja Maschuw; Matthias Rothmund; Michael Koller; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.745

8.  The red DRAGON: a multi-modality system for simulation and training in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Scott Gunther; Jacob Rosen; Blake Hannaford; Mika Sinanan
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

9.  Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.

Authors:  David W Lin; John R Romanelli; Jay N Kuhn; Renee E Thompson; Ron W Bush; Neal E Seymour
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Face, content and construct validity of the University of Washington virtual reality transurethral prostate resection trainer.

Authors:  R Sweet; T Kowalewski; P Oppenheimer; S Weghorst; R Satava
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.450

  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Authors:  Sonal Grover; Gerald Y Tan; Abhishek Srivastava; Robert A Leung; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alyssa Tanaka; Courtney Graddy; Khara Simpson; Manuela Perez; Mireille Truong; Roger Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; François Pugin; Francesco Volonté; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Development and evaluation of rhinoplasty spreader graft suture simulator for novice surgeons.

Authors:  Connie J Oh; Prem B Tripathi; Jeffrey T Gu; Pamela Borden; Brian J-F Wong
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot.

Authors:  Roger Smith; Mireille Truong; Manuela Perez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Using virtual reality to maintain surgical skills during periods of robotic surgery inactivity.

Authors:  Loredana M Guseila; Archana Saranathan; Eric L Jenison; Karen M Gil; John J Elias
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-04-29

7.  Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance.

Authors:  Patrick S McDonough; Timothy J Tausch; Andrew C Peterson; Timothy C Brand
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-02-27

8.  Virtual Laparoscopic Training System Based on VCH Model.

Authors:  Jiangzhou Tang; Lang Xu; Longjun He; Songluan Guan; Xing Ming; Qian Liu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Thomas S Lendvay; Timothy C Brand; Lee White; Timothy Kowalewski; Saikiran Jonnadula; Laina D Mercer; Derek Khorsand; Justin Andros; Blake Hannaford; Richard M Satava
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.