Literature DB >> 15650649

Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.

Anthony G Gallagher1, E Matt Ritter, Howard Champion, Gerald Higgins, Marvin P Fried, Gerald Moses, C Daniel Smith, Richard M Satava.   

Abstract

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To inform surgeons about the practical issues to be considered for successful integration of virtual reality simulation into a surgical training program. The learning and practice of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) makes unique demands on surgical training programs. A decade ago Satava proposed virtual reality (VR) surgical simulation as a solution for this problem. Only recently have robust scientific studies supported that vision
METHODS: A review of the surgical education, human-factor, and psychology literature to identify important factors which will impinge on the successful integration of VR training into a surgical training program.
RESULTS: VR is more likely to be successful if it is systematically integrated into a well-thought-out education and training program which objectively assesses technical skills improvement proximate to the learning experience. Validated performance metrics should be relevant to the surgical task being trained but in general will require trainees to reach an objectively determined proficiency criterion, based on tightly defined metrics and perform at this level consistently. VR training is more likely to be successful if the training schedule takes place on an interval basis rather than massed into a short period of extensive practice. High-fidelity VR simulations will confer the greatest skills transfer to the in vivo surgical situation, but less expensive VR trainers will also lead to considerably improved skills generalizations.
CONCLUSIONS: VR for improved performance of MIS is now a reality. However, VR is only a training tool that must be thoughtfully introduced into a surgical training curriculum for it to successfully improve surgical technical skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15650649      PMCID: PMC1356924          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Assessing operative skill. Needs to become more objective.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Smith; N Taffinder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

2.  Surgical simulation - a 'good idea whose time has come'.

Authors:  H R Champion; A G Gallagher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  E Matt Ritter; David A McClusky; Andrew B Lederman; Anthony G Gallagher; C Daniel Smith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality.

Authors:  G B Hanna; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The Southern Surgeons Club.

Authors:  M J Moore; C L Bennett
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Virtual reality surgical simulator. The first steps.

Authors:  R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Selective and control processes.

Authors:  D E Broadbent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1981 Aug-Dec

10.  Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons.

Authors:  J C Rosser; L E Rosser; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-06
View more
  156 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic placement of tubal sterilization implants: virtual reality simulator training.

Authors:  Pierre Panel; Michael Bajka; Arnaud Le Tohic; Alaa El Ghoneimi; Carmen Chis; Stéphane Cotin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning curves of basic laparoscopic psychomotor skills in SINERGIA VR simulator.

Authors:  L F Sánchez-Peralta; F M Sánchez-Margallo; J L Moyano-Cuevas; J B Pagador; S Enciso; E J Gómez-Aguilera; J Usón-Gargallo
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Positive correlation between motion analysis data on the LapMentor virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator and the results from videotape assessment of real laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Tadashi Matsuda; Elspeth M McDougall; Yoshinari Ono; Ryohei Hattori; Shiro Baba; Masatsugu Iwamura; Toshiro Terachi; Seiji Naito; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Virtual reality in orthopaedics: is it a reality?

Authors:  Jay D Mabrey; Karl D Reinig; W Dilworth Cannon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation.

Authors:  Carol E Reiley; Henry C Lin; David D Yuh; Gregory D Hager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Construct validity of the LapVR virtual-reality surgical simulator.

Authors:  Naoki Iwata; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera; Chie Tanaka; Norifumi Ohashi; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Akimasa Nakao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effects of virtual reality simulator training method and observational learning on surgical performance.

Authors:  Christopher W Snyder; Marianne J Vandromme; Sharon L Tyra; John R Porterfield; Ronald H Clements; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Virtual reality training improves wet-lab performance of capsulorhexis: results of a randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Feudner; Corinna Engel; Irmingard M Neuhann; Katrin Petermeier; Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Peter Szurman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  LLETZ Specimen Fragmentation: Impact on Diagnosis, Outcome, and Implications for Training.

Authors:  Rasiah Bharathan; Balvinder Sagoo; Aravind Subramaniam; Peter Larsen-Disney; Andrew Fish
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.