Literature DB >> 20425095

Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents.

Sonal Grover1, Gerald Y Tan, Abhishek Srivastava, Robert A Leung, Ashutosh K Tewari.   

Abstract

The advent of laparoscopic and robotic techniques for management of urologic malignancies marked the beginning of an ever-expanding array of minimally invasive options available to cancer patients. With the popularity of these treatment modalities, there is a growing need for trained surgical oncologists who not only have a deep understanding of the disease process and adept surgical skills, but also show technical mastery in operating the equipment used to perform these techniques. Establishing a robotic prostatectomy program is a tremendous undertaking for any institution, as it involves a huge cost, especially in the purchasing and maintenance of the robot. Residency programs often face many challenges when trying to establish a balance between costs associated with robotic surgery and training of the urology residents, while maintaining an acceptable operative time. Herein we describe residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents. Our proposed paradigm outlines the approach to compensate for the cost involved in robotic training establishment without compromising the quality of education provided. With the potential advantages for both patients and surgeons, we contemplate that robotic-assisted surgery may become an integral component of residency training programs in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20425095     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-010-0093-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  27 in total

1.  Robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  M Menon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique.

Authors:  M Wolfram; R Bräutigam; T Engl; W Bentas; S Heitkamp; M Ostwald; W Kramer; J Binder; R Blaheta; D Jonas; W-D Beecken
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Perioperative complications of robotic radical prostatectomy after the learning curve.

Authors:  Akshay Bhandari; Linda McIntire; Sanjeev A Kaul; Ashok K Hemal; James O Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Robotic prostatectomy: the first UK experience.

Authors:  E K Mayer; M H Winkler; R Aggarwal; O Karim; C Ogden; D Hrouda; A W Darzi; J A Vale
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Paul A Merguerian; William Bihrle; John D Seigne
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Geoffrey N Box; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.309

7.  Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Israel Nosnik; Leon Sun; Cary N Robertson; Philip Walther; David Albala; Judd W Moul; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up.

Authors:  Albert A Mikhail; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ehab S Billatos; Kevin C Zorn; Edward M Gong; Charles B Brendler; Gregory P Zagaja; Arieh L Shalhav
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James Peabody
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Authors:  A Tewari; A Srivasatava; M Menon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  8 in total

1.  The use of robotics in pediatric surgery: my initial experience.

Authors:  Juan I Camps
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  The virtual reality simulator dV-Trainer(®) is a valid assessment tool for robotic surgical skills.

Authors:  Cyril Perrenot; Manuela Perez; Nguyen Tran; Jean-Philippe Jehl; Jacques Felblinger; Laurent Bresler; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Urology residents experience comparable workload profiles when performing live porcine nephrectomies and robotic surgery virtual reality training modules.

Authors:  Vladimir Mouraviev; Martina Klein; Eric Schommer; David D Thiel; Srinivas Samavedi; Anup Kumar; Raymond J Leveillee; Raju Thomas; Julio M Pow-Sang; Li-Ming Su; Engy Mui; Roger Smith; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-01-11

4.  3D-printed soft-tissue physical models of renal malignancies for individualized surgical simulation: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Michael M Maddox; Allison Feibus; James Liu; Julie Wang; Raju Thomas; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-20

5.  Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot).

Authors:  Andrea Gavazzi; Ali N Bahsoun; Wim Van Haute; Kamran Ahmed; Oussama Elhage; Peter Jaye; M Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a case series of the first 100 patients--constitutional introduction and implementation on the basis of comprehensive department of minimal invasive surgery center.

Authors:  Takehiro Sejima; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Katsuya Hikita; Naoto Kobayashi; Akihisa Yao; Kuniyasu Muraoka; Masashi Honda; Hiroya Kitano; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-10-30

7.  Attitudes and access of Irish general surgery trainees to robotic surgical training.

Authors:  Lauren V O'Connell; Cathal Hayes; Mohamed Ismail; Diarmuid S O'Ríordáin; Adnan Hafeez
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-03-30

8.  Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  E Willuth; S F Hardon; F Lang; C M Haney; E A Felinska; K F Kowalewski; B P Müller-Stich; T Horeman; F Nickel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.