Literature DB >> 23640724

Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art.

Nicolas C Buchs1, François Pugin, Francesco Volonté, Philippe Morel.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery has emerged as a new technology over the last decade and has brought with it new challenges, particularly in terms of teaching and training. To overcome these challenges, robotic courses, virtual simulation, and dual consoles have been successfully introduced. In fact, there are several simulators currently on the market that have proven to be a valid option for training, especially for the novice trainee. Robotic courses have also found success around the world, allowing participants to implement robotic programs at their institution, typically with the help of a proctor. More recently, the dual console has enabled two surgeons to be operating at the same time. Having one experienced surgeon and one trainee each at his or her own console has made it an obvious choice for training. Although these methods have been successfully introduced, the data remain relatively scarce concerning their role in training. The aim of this article was to review the various methods and tools involved in the training of surgeons in robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23640724     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2065-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  92 in total

1.  Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Genevieve Dulan; Deborah C Hogg; Robert V Rege; Cathryn E Powers; Seifu T Tesfay; Linda S Hynan; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents.

Authors:  Ruslan Korets; Adam C Mues; Joseph A Graversen; Mantu Gupta; Mitchell C Benson; Kimberly L Cooper; Jaime Landman; Ketan K Badani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training.

Authors:  Matthew J Fiedler; Shing-Jye Chen; Timothy N Judkins; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Robotic and laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.

Authors:  Hiten R H Patel; Ana Linares; Jean V Joseph
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS.

Authors:  George Xeroulis; Adam Dubrowski; Ken Leslie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks.

Authors:  Timothy N Judkins; Dmitry Oleynikov; Nick Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Corollos Abdelshehid; Stephen Quach; Achim Lusch; Joseph Graversen; Jaime Landman; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency.

Authors:  K Narazaki; D Oleynikov; N Stergiou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

10.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic procedures in a fellowship training program.

Authors:  Paula S Lee; Amy Bland; Fidel A Valea; Laura J Havrilesky; Andrew Berchuck; Angeles Alvarez Secord
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  11 in total

1.  Single- versus dual-console robotic surgery: dual improves the educational experience for trainees.

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; M Brown; B Challacombe
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Education and training in pediatric robotic surgery: lessons learned from an inaugural multinational workshop.

Authors:  Thomas P Cundy; Erik K Mayer; Juan I Camps; Lars H Olsen; Gloria Pelizzo; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi; Azad S Najmaldin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-10-17

3.  Face, content, construct, and concurrent validity of a novel robotic surgery patient-side simulator: the Xperience™ Team Trainer.

Authors:  Song Xu; Manuela Perez; Cyril Perrenot; Nicolas Hubert; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Robotics and surgery: A sustainable relationship?

Authors:  Ankur Khajuria
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  A methodological, task-based approach to Procedure-Specific Simulations training.

Authors:  Yaki Setty; Oren Salzman
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  30 Years of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Oly Campos Corleta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of robotic single and dual console systems in the training of minimally invasive gynecology surgery (MIGS) fellows.

Authors:  Mateo G Leon; Aakriti R Carrubba; Christopher C DeStephano; Michael G Heckman; Emily C Craver; Tri A Dinh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-01-13

Review 8.  [Spectrum of laparoscopic surgery for gastric tumors].

Authors:  S P Mönig; S H Chon; J Weindelmayer; G de Manzoni; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.

Authors:  Monica S C Morgan; Nabeel A Shakir; Maurilio Garcia-Gil; Asim Ozayar; Jeffrey C Gahan; Justin I Friedlander; Claus G Roehrborn; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  The effects of gender, age, and videogame experience on performance and experiences with a surgical robotic arm: an exploratory study with general public.

Authors:  Selen Türkay; Kate Letheren; Ross Crawford; Jonathan Roberts; Anjali Tumkur Jaiprakash
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.