Literature DB >> 23583618

Virtual reality robotic surgery warm-up improves task performance in a dry laboratory environment: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Thomas S Lendvay1, Timothy C Brand, Lee White, Timothy Kowalewski, Saikiran Jonnadula, Laina D Mercer, Derek Khorsand, Justin Andros, Blake Hannaford, Richard M Satava.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative simulation warm-up has been shown to improve performance and reduce errors in novice and experienced surgeons, yet existing studies have only investigated conventional laparoscopy. We hypothesized that a brief virtual reality (VR) robotic warm-up would enhance robotic task performance and reduce errors. STUDY
DESIGN: In a 2-center randomized trial, 51 residents and experienced minimally invasive surgery faculty in General Surgery, Urology, and Gynecology underwent a validated robotic surgery proficiency curriculum on a VR robotic simulator and on the da Vinci surgical robot (Intuitive Surgical Inc). Once they successfully achieved performance benchmarks, surgeons were randomized to either receive a 3- to 5-minute VR simulator warm-up or read a leisure book for 10 minutes before performing similar and dissimilar (intracorporeal suturing) robotic surgery tasks. The primary outcomes compared were task time, tool path length, economy of motion, technical, and cognitive errors.
RESULTS: Task time (-29.29 seconds, p = 0.001; 95% CI, -47.03 to -11.56), path length (-79.87 mm; p = 0.014; 95% CI, -144.48 to -15.25), and cognitive errors were reduced in the warm-up group compared with the control group for similar tasks. Global technical errors in intracorporeal suturing (0.32; p = 0.020; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59) were reduced after the dissimilar VR task. When surgeons were stratified by earlier robotic and laparoscopic clinical experience, the more experienced surgeons (n = 17) demonstrated significant improvements from warm-up in task time (-53.5 seconds; p = 0.001; 95% CI, -83.9 to -23.0) and economy of motion (0.63 mm/s; p = 0.007; 95% CI, 0.18-1.09), and improvement in these metrics was not statistically significantly appreciated in the less-experienced cohort (n = 34).
CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant performance improvement and error reduction rates among surgeons of varying experience after VR warm-up for basic robotic surgery tasks. In addition, the VR warm-up reduced errors on a more complex task (robotic suturing), suggesting the generalizability of the warm-up.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23583618      PMCID: PMC4082669          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  28 in total

1.  Transfer of training in acquiring laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  P L Figert; A E Park; D B Witzke; R W Schwartz
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced, junior, and novice laparoscopists with virtual reality.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; K Richie; N McClure; J McGuigan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Metrics for objective Assessment.

Authors:  R M Satava; A Cuschieri; J Hamdorf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education.

Authors:  Paul Batalden; David Leach; Susan Swing; Hubert Dreyfus; Stuart Dreyfus
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Warm-up effect in human maze learning.

Authors:  C E HAMILTON; W R MOLA
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-06

8.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; E Matt Ritter; Howard Champion; Gerald Higgins; Marvin P Fried; Gerald Moses; C Daniel Smith; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization.

Authors:  Chunliu Zhan; Marlene R Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  22 in total

1.  Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis.

Authors:  Alyssa Tanaka; Courtney Graddy; Khara Simpson; Manuela Perez; Mireille Truong; Roger Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotic surgery, skills and simulation: a technical sport.

Authors:  S S Goonewardene; D Cahill
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-11-14

Review 3.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.

Authors:  Justin D Bric; Derek C Lumbard; Matthew J Frelich; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Does warming up improve surgical outcome in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Asim M Makhdom; AbdulAziz Almaawi; Dylan Tanzer; Michael Tanzer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-08-20

Review 5.  A systematic examination of preoperative surgery warm-up routines.

Authors:  T W Pike; S Pathak; F Mushtaq; R M Wilkie; M Mon-Williams; J P A Lodge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The impact of days off between cases on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Shane M Pearce; Joseph J Pariser; Sanjay G Patel; Blake B Anderson; Scott E Eggener; Gregory P Zagaja
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: An emerging technology.

Authors:  Etai M Bogen; Knut M Augestad; Hiten Rh Patel; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-05-16

8.  Preconditioning in laparoscopic surgery--results of a virtual reality pilot study.

Authors:  M Paschold; T Huber; D W Kauff; K Buchheim; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  The effect of warm-up on surgical performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gamal Abdalla; Erin Moran-Atkin; Grace Chen; Michael A Schweitzer; Thomas H Magnuson; Kimberley E Steele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot.

Authors:  Roger Smith; Mireille Truong; Manuela Perez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.