Literature DB >> 27637707

Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance.

Patrick S McDonough1, Timothy J Tausch2, Andrew C Peterson1, Timothy C Brand1.   

Abstract

Virtual reality robotic simulation has gained widespread momentum. In order to determine the value of virtual reality robotic simulation and its objective metrics, a reality-based robotic surgical training platform with similar analytic capabilities must be developed and validated. The ProMIS laparoscopic surgical simulator is a widely available reality-based simulation platform that has been previously validated as an objective measure of laparoscopic task performance. In this study, we evaluated the validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance. Volunteers were recruited from two experience groups (novice and expert). All subjects completed three tasks (peg transfer, precision cutting, intracorporeal suture/knot) in the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator using the da Vinci robotic surgical system. Motion analysis data was obtained by the ProMIS computerized optical tracking system and objective metrics recorded included time, path length, economy of motion, and observer-recorded penalty scores. The novice group consisted of 10 subjects with no previous robotic surgical experience. The expert group consisted of 10 subjects with robotic experience. The expert group outperformed the novice group in all three tasks. Subjects rated this training platform as easy to use, as an accurate measure of their robotic surgical proficiency, and as relevant to robotic surgery. The experts described the simulator platform as useful for training and agreed with incorporating it into a residency curriculum. This study demonstrates that the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator is a face, content, and construct valid reality-based simulation platform that can be used for objectively measuring robotic task performance.

Keywords:  ProMIS validation; Robotic surgery; Simulation education; da Vinci

Year:  2011        PMID: 27637707     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0256-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  10 in total

1.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; E M Ritter; R M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman; Melina C Vassiliou; Shannon A Fraser; Donna Stanbridge; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Christopher G Andrew
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.

Authors:  K R Van Sickle; D A McClusky; A G Gallagher; C D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Validation of surgical simulators.

Authors:  Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  A computerized analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic task performance.

Authors:  Vimal K Narula; William C Watson; S Scott Davis; Kristen Hinshaw; Bradley J Needleman; Dean J Mikami; Jeffrey W Hazey; John H Winston; P Muscarella; Mike Rubin; Vipul Patel; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  Michael G C Pellen; Liam F Horgan; J Roger Barton; Stephen E Attwood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.

Authors:  Venita Chandra; Deepika Nehra; Richard Parent; Russell Woo; Rosette Reyes; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Sanjeev Dutta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  A M Derossis; G M Fried; M Abrahamowicz; H H Sigman; J S Barkun; J L Meakins
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator.

Authors:  Thomas S Lendvay; Pasquale Casale; Robert Sweet; Craig Peters
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-07-25

10.  Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator.

Authors:  Amanjot S Sethi; William J Peine; Yousef Mohammadi; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.942

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Simulation-based training in robot-assisted surgery: current evidence of value and potential trends for the future.

Authors:  Michael I Hanzly; Tareq Al-Tartir; Syed Johar Raza; Atif Khan; Mohammad Manan Durrani; Thomas Fiorica; Phillip Ginsberg; James L Mohler; Boris Kuvshinoff; Khurshid A Guru
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.

Authors:  Brandon S Childs; Marc D Manganiello; Ruslan Korets
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Head-to-Head Comparison of Three Virtual-Reality Robotic Surgery Simulators.

Authors:  Alexandria M Hertz; Evalyn I George; Christine M Vaccaro; Timothy C Brand
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.