Literature DB >> 27589153

Bismuth germanate coupled to near ultraviolet silicon photomultipliers for time-of-flight PET.

Sun Il Kwon1, Alberto Gola, Alessandro Ferri, Claudio Piemonte, Simon R Cherry.   

Abstract

Bismuth germanate (BGO) was a very attractive scintillator in early-generation positron emission tomography (PET) scanners. However, the major disadvantages of BGO are lower light yield and longer rise and decay time compared to currently popular scintillators such as LSO and LYSO. This results in poorer coincidence timing resolution and it has generally been assumed that BGO is not a suitable scintillator for time-of-flight (TOF) PET applications. However, when a 511 keV photon interacts in a scintillator, a number of Cerenkov photons are produced promptly by energetic electrons released by photoelectric or Compton interactions. If these prompt photons can be captured, they could provide a better timing trigger for PET. Since BGO has a high refractive index (increasing the Cerenkov light yield) and excellent optical transparency down to 320 nm (Cerenkov light yield is higher at shorter wavelengths), we hypothesized that the coincidence timing resolution of BGO can be significantly improved by efficient detection of the Cerenkov photons. However, since the number of Cerenkov photons is far less than the number of scintillation photons, and they are more abundant in the UV and blue part of the spectrum, photosensors need to have high UV/blue sensitivity, fast temporal response, and very low noise in order to trigger on the faint Cerenkov signal. In this respect, NUV-HD silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) (FBK, Trento, Italy) are an excellent fit for our approach. In this study, coincidence events were measured using BGO crystals coupled with NUV-HD SiPMs. The existence and influence of Cerenkov photons on the timing measurements were studied using different configurations to exploit the directionality of the Cerenkov emissions. Coincidence resolving time values (FWHM) of ~270 ps from 2  ×  3  ×  2 mm3 BGO crystals and ~560 ps from 3  ×  3  ×  20 mm3 BGO crystals were obtained. To our knowledge, these are the best coincidence resolving time values reported for BGO to date. With these values, BGO can be considered as a relevant scintillator for TOF PET scanners, especially if photodetectors with even better near UV/blue response can be developed to further improve the efficiency of Cerenkov light detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27589153      PMCID: PMC5056849          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/18/L38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  11 in total

Review 1.  From PET detectors to PET scanners.

Authors:  John L Humm; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Alberto Del Guerra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Performance evaluation of the positron scanner ECAT EXACT.

Authors:  K Wienhard; L Eriksson; S Grootoonk; M Casey; U Pietrzyk; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

3.  Benefit of time-of-flight in PET: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti; Margaret E Daube-Witherspoon; Gerd Muehllehner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Performance characteristics of an eight-ring whole body PET scanner.

Authors:  E Rota Kops; H Herzog; A Schmid; S Holte; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  CHERENCUBE: concept definition and implementation challenges of a Cherenkov-based detector block for PET.

Authors:  I Somlai-Schweiger; S I Ziegler
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Scintillation crystals for PET.

Authors:  C L Melcher
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  The ECAT EXACT HR: performance of a new high resolution positron scanner.

Authors:  K Wienhard; M Dahlbom; L Eriksson; C Michel; T Bruckbauer; U Pietrzyk; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; T G Turkington; J J Williams; C W Stearns; J M Hoffman; R E Coleman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 9.  Update on time-of-flight PET imaging.

Authors:  Suleman Surti
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Monte Carlo calculations of PET coincidence timing: single and double-ended readout.

Authors:  Stephen E Derenzo; Woon-Seng Choong; William W Moses
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Innovations in Instrumentation for Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 2.  Photon counting detectors and their applications ranging from particle physics experiments to environmental radiation monitoring and medical imaging.

Authors:  Ryosuke Ota
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-03-19

Review 3.  History and future technical innovation in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Terry Jones; David Townsend
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Dual-ended readout of bismuth germanate to improve timing resolution in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Sun Il Kwon; Emilie Roncali; Alberto Gola; Giovanni Paternoster; Claudio Piemonte; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Towards time-of-flight PET with a semiconductor detector.

Authors:  Gerard Ariño-Estrada; Gregory S Mitchell; Sun Il Kwon; Junwei Du; Hadong Kim; Leonard J Cirignano; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Update on latest advances in time-of-flight PET.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Joel S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Using convolutional neural networks to estimate time-of-flight from PET detector waveforms.

Authors:  Eric Berg; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Evaluation of a clinical TOF-PET detector design that achieves ⩽100 ps coincidence time resolution.

Authors:  Joshua W Cates; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  Radioluminescence in biomedicine: physics, applications, and models.

Authors:  Justin S Klein; Conroy Sun; Guillem Pratx
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Roadmap toward the 10 ps time-of-flight PET challenge.

Authors:  Paul Lecoq; Christian Morel; John O Prior; Dimitris Visvikis; Stefan Gundacker; Etiennette Auffray; Peter Križan; Rosana Martinez Turtos; Dominique Thers; Edoardo Charbon; Joao Varela; Christophe de La Taille; Angelo Rivetti; Dominique Breton; Jean-François Pratte; Johan Nuyts; Suleman Surti; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Paul Marsden; Katia Parodi; Jose Maria Benlloch; Mathieu Benoit
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.