Literature DB >> 2753999

Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

J A Kellogg1, J W Seiple, J S Levisky.   

Abstract

In an attempt to increase Chlamydiazyme (Abbott Laboratories) detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen and to establish the reproducibility of positive results, we carried out an investigation into the usefulness of testing duplicate specimens, of more aggressive endocervical specimen collection by using cytobrushes instead of swabs, and of the repeated testing of both specimens from patients with one or two positive results. Duplicate endocervical (female) and urethral (male) specimens, including one swab and one cytobrush specimen from 1,331 nonpregnant women, were collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Specimens were transported and tested for C. trachomatis antigen as specified by the manufacturer. Tests on all specimens from patients with positive results were repeated. Antigen was initially detected in one or both specimens from 210 (10.7%) of 1,968 patients, and repetition of the tests confirmed its presence in 198 (10.1%) of the patients, including all 183 patients in whom it was initially detected in both specimens. Initial results from at least 8 of the 12 patients with irreproducible antigen detection were most probably falsely positive. Results from 21 (10.6%) of the 198 patients for whom antigen detection was confirmed were repeatedly positive on only one specimen (9 [4.5%] on the second of the two specimens collected). Of 115 women from whom one swab and one cytobrush sample were taken and who had repeatedly positive results, antigen was detected in 7 (6.1%) only on the swab sample and in 4 (3.5%) only on the cytobrush sample. Use of the cytobrush does not appear justified with the Chlamydiazyme assay, and collection of duplicate specimens provided only a modest increase in detection of C. trachomatis. However, repeated testing of specimens when results from only one of two specimens are positive appears to be of clinical value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2753999      PMCID: PMC267530          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1218-1221.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Confidence intervals for reporting results of clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comparison of scrape, swab, and cytobrush samples for the diagnosis of cervical chlamydial infection by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  L E Lindner; J A Nettum; S L Miller; K H Altman
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in males by cell culture and antigen detection test.

Authors:  H Moi; D Danielsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using consecutive endocervical swabs. Prevalence in asymptomatic female adolescents and women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.

Authors:  T J Hernandez; K L Noller; T F Smith
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization analysis for the detection of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.

Authors:  C C Pao; S S Lin; T E Yang; Y K Soong; P S Lee; J Y Lin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  False positive results with the use of chlamydial antigen detection tests in the evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in children.

Authors:  M R Hammerschlag; P J Rettig; M E Shields
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  Diagnosis of chlamydial infection in women attending antenatal and gynecologic clinics.

Authors:  J W Smith; R E Rogers; B P Katz; J F Brickler; P L Lineback; B Van der Pol; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.

Authors:  V S Baselski; S G McNeeley; G Ryan; M Robison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  8 in total

1.  Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  H Hallander; P Jonsson; B Gästrin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.

Authors:  L O Svensson; M Domeika; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1993-10

5.  Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay.

Authors:  M A Olsen; A R Sambol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; G Bolan; J Engelman; L Howard; I Mushahwar; G Ridgway; G Mumtaz; W Stamm; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Determining cystic fibrosis-affected lung microbiology: comparison of spontaneous and serially induced sputum samples by use of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling.

Authors:  Geraint B Rogers; Stuart Skelton; David J Serisier; Christopher J van der Gast; Kenneth D Bruce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J L Klinedinst; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.