Literature DB >> 3326709

Comparison of scrape, swab, and cytobrush samples for the diagnosis of cervical chlamydial infection by immunofluorescence.

L E Lindner1, J A Nettum, S L Miller, K H Altman.   

Abstract

An endocervical swab, cytologic scraper, and endocervical cytobrush were used to prepare simultaneous full-slide smears for immunofluorescence for the diagnosis of cervical chlamydial infection. The cytobrush produced the best sample, with significantly higher numbers of organisms. Most of the false negative results were obtained with the cytologic scraper. The optimum technique appears to be to use a cytobrush sample; however, a swab should be used with pregnant patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3326709     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90169-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  7 in total

1.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; M Shipp; G Bolan; J Wilber
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Dacron-tipped applicator and cytobrush for detection of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  T L Weiland; K L Noller; T F Smith; S J Ory
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Cervical sampling for diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection with a new brush device.

Authors:  L O Svensson; M Domeika; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1993-10

5.  Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J L Klinedinst; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.