Literature DB >> 8349769

Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay.

M A Olsen1, A R Sambol.   

Abstract

We studied the specificity of the Abbott Chlamydiazyme test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by means of a specific blocking antibody test. A total of 457 previously positive specimens were tested; 22 did not block in the blocking antibody test, 39 did not repeat as positive, and 396 were confirmed as positive. The distribution of A492 values obtained with specimens which did not repeat as positive was nonrandom and was concentrated between the cutoff values and 0.400. The positive predictive value of the Chlamydiazyme assay after initial testing was 86.7% (396 of 457), but the positive predictive value increased to 94.7% (396 of 418) if specimens which were not repeatedly positive were considered negative. We recommend routinely repeating the Chlamydiazyme assay for all specimens which give A492 values between the cutoff and 0.400 to eliminate many false-positive results. Use of the blocking antibody reagent can then be reserved for confirming only specimens which are repeatedly positive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8349769      PMCID: PMC265652          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1892-1895.1993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

1.  Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  H Hallander; P Jonsson; B Gästrin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Clinical and laboratory considerations of culture vs antigen assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.

Authors:  J A Kellogg
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Use of blocking reagent to confirm enzyme immunoassay results in chlamydial conjunctivitis.

Authors:  P A Mårdh; A N Elbagir; K Stenberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme for the detection of genital infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  L V Howard; P F Coleman; B J England; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Diagnosis of chlamydial infection in women attending antenatal and gynecologic clinics.

Authors:  J W Smith; R E Rogers; B P Katz; J F Brickler; P L Lineback; B Van der Pol; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  A comparison of nonculture-dependent methods for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.

Authors:  V S Baselski; S G McNeeley; G Ryan; M Robison
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  3 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.

Authors:  K Fonseca; D W Megran; C M Anand
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Blocking antibody assay for confirmation of urogenital Chlamydia infection.

Authors:  I Nachamkin; D L Riddle; J O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1995-09

3.  PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  J Krepel; I Laur; A Sproston; K Luinstra; D Jang; J Mahony; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.