Literature DB >> 3536503

Diagnosis of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in males by cell culture and antigen detection test.

H Moi, D Danielsson.   

Abstract

Urethral Chlamydia trachomatis infection was diagnosed in 204 of 1,011 (20.2%) male patients by cell culture, in 219 (21.7%) by an antigen detection test consisting of a solid phase immunoassay, and in 247 (24.4%) patients by both methods combined. The positive results of the two methods agreed for 176 patients, and both positive and negative results of the tests agreed for 940 patients (93%). With cell culture as the reference method, the antigen detection test had a sensitivity of 86.3%, a specificity of 94.7%, a positive predictive value of 80.4% and a negative predictive value of 96.5%. It gave false negative results in 28 patients. In 43 patients the antigen detection test gave a positive result, whereas culture was negative. Thirty-nine of these males were treated with antibiotics (tetracycline or erythromycin), 19 because their consorts had a proven Chlamydia trachomatis infection, and 20 for obvious clinical and/or microscopic findings of urethritis requiring treatment. According to this analysis there were 19 probable misses by cell culture test and four true false-positives by the antigen detection test, i.e. less than 0.4% of all patients examined. Since one-third of males with a final diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection were clinically asymptomatic efforts to control genital chlamydial infections must identify this reservoir. The antigen detection test provides an alternative diagnostic method to the more laborious and time-consuming cell culture procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3536503     DOI: 10.1007/BF02017706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0722-2211            Impact factor:   3.267


  12 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia (Bedsonia) in certain infections of man. I. Laboratory procedures: comparison of yolk sac and cell culture for detection and isolation.

Authors:  F B Gordon; I A Harper; A L Quan; J D Treharne; R S Dwyer; J A Garland
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen in urethral and endocervical swabs.

Authors:  G Mumtaz; B J Mellars; G L Ridgway; J D Oriel
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent males: value of first-catch urine examination.

Authors:  H Adger; M A Shafer; R L Sweet; J Schachter
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Chlamydiazyme test.

Authors:  M F Jones; T F Smith; A J Houglum; J E Herrmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases in the Scandinavian countries.

Authors:  H Hansson; D Danielsson
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1982

6.  Culture diagnosis of gonorrhoea--a comparison between two standard laboratory methods and a commercial gonococcal culture kit (Kvadricult).

Authors:  D Danielsson; E Sandström; J Kjellander; H Moi; G Wallmark
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 4.437

7.  Cultivation of Chlamydia trachomatis in cycloheximide-treated mccoy cells.

Authors:  K T Ripa; P A Mårdh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Biological principles of the culture of Chlamydia trachomatis in cell monolayers.

Authors:  K T Ripa
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1982

9.  Solid-phase enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J van Ulsen; A van Zuuren-van der Horst; K H Tjiam; Y van der Heijst; M F Michel; R V van Eijk; T van Joost; E Stolz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures.

Authors:  P A Mårdh; B Zeeberg
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1981-08
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

2.  Comparison of three techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women.

Authors:  J Lefebvre; H Laperrière; H Rousseau; R Massé
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Epidemiology and aetiology of acute non-tuberculous salpingitis. A comparison between the early 1970s and the early 1980s with special reference to gonorrhoea and use of intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  F Kamwendo; L Forslin; D Danielsson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1990-10

4.  Assessment of enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S S Hipp; Y Han; D Murphy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Influence of storing urogenital specimens at -20 degrees C before testing by enzyme amplified immunoassay (IDEIA) to detect Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

Authors:  S Bygdeman; C Teichert; A Ahlin; P Lidbrink; H A Jama
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1989-04

6.  Comparative evaluation of detection assays for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R Warren; B Dwyer; M Plackett; K Pettit; N Rizvi; A M Baker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Solid phase enzyme immunoassay for detection of non-complicated cervical infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J van Ulsen; J H Wagenvoort; R V van Eijk; E Stolz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Evaluation of a commercial enzyme immunoassay versus culture for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  M Bäckman; A K Rudén; O Ringertz; E G Sanström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections.

Authors:  R C Barnes
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 26.132

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.