Literature DB >> 1526241

Value of confirmation of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay results in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

H Hallander1, P Jonsson, B Gästrin.   

Abstract

The specificity of an EIA (Chlamydiazyme, Abbott) for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis was evaluated by means of a monoclonal antibody blocking reagent (Abbott) and a direct fluorescent antibody test (DFA) (Micro Trak, Syva). Of the 12,864 tested specimens from the urethra and cervix, 666 (5.2%) were positive. When retested with the same technique 625 (4.9%) were again positive. The result in 514 (4.0%) specimens was verified by means of the blocking reagent. Of specimens with absorbance values just below the established cut-off limit (0.07-0.114), 31 of 79 (39.2%) were specifically inhibited, increasing the rate of positive results by 0.25%. The results confirmed with the blocking reagent were in agreement with those obtained by DFA. The findings show that verification of positive Chlamydiazyme results is strongly advisable, in particular in specimens from the cervix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1526241     DOI: 10.1007/bf01960813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  12 in total

1.  Early detection of genital chlamydial infection in women: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  A Estany; M Todd; M Vasquez; R McLaren
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1989 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; C L Murray; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  False positive results with an ELISA for detection of chlamydia antigen.

Authors:  T Riordan; D A Ellis; P I Matthews; S F Ratcliffe
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Cross-reactivity between Chlamydiazyme and Acinetobacter strains.

Authors:  P Saikku; M Puolakkainen; M Leinonen; M Nurminen; A Nissinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.

Authors:  J Moncada; J Schachter; G Bolan; J Engelman; L Howard; I Mushahwar; G Ridgway; G Mumtaz; W Stamm; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  TestPack Chlamydia, a new rapid assay for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  P Coleman; V Varitek; I K Mushahwar; B Marchlewicz; J Safford; J Hansen; G Kurpiewski; T Grier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  False-positive Chlamydiazyme results during urine sediment analysis due to bacterial urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J Demaio; R S Boyd; R Rensi; A Clark
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J W Seiple; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Lack of specificity of Chlamydiazyme for detection of vaginal chlamydial infection in prepubertal girls.

Authors:  K Porder; N Sanchez; P M Roblin; M McHugh; M R Hammerschlag
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  5 in total

1.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay.

Authors:  M A Olsen; A R Sambol
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Improved performance of PACE 2 with modified collection system in combination with probe competition assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral specimens from males.

Authors:  J A Kluytmans; W H Goessens; J H van Rijsoort-Vos; H G Niesters; E Stolz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current methods of laboratory diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections.

Authors:  C M Black
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay.

Authors:  J Krepel; I Laur; A Sproston; K Luinstra; D Jang; J Mahony; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.